Adult Support & Protection Code of Practice: Consultation
Scottish Government is consulting on a revised Adult Support & Protection Code of Practice. The revised Code of Practice reflects changes to practice and case law not availbale to those drafting the original guidance.
5. Consultation Questions
The revised Code of Practice is a larger and more comprehensive document than the original Code and we welcome your views on any of the changes made. In particular, we would appreciate your views on the following matters:
Question 1: Chapter 3
This chapter of the Code sets out the principles of the Adult Support and Protection legislation and the definition of an adult at risk.
Does this chapter help in your understanding of the legislation and whom it applies to?
If not, what changes would you suggest?
Question 2: Chapter 5
This chapter of the Code considers the principle of ensuring full regard is given to the wishes of the adult, and ensuring that the adult participates in decisions as fully as possible.
Does this chapter adequately covers the issues arising from ensuring as far as possible full participation by adults in decision making?
If not, what changes would you suggest?
Question 3: Chapter 6
This chapter includes new guidance on large scale inquiries. Does this provide sufficient clarity for this type of inquiry or are there additional matters you would wish considered?
Question 4: Chapter 11
This chapter is a new addition to the Code and considers a multi-agency approach.
Does this provide sufficient clarity and support for your organisation in handling multi-agency assessments and practice?
Are there other matters that you consider should be included in this chapter?
Question 5: Users and Carers
The Code seeks to develop and articulate good practice as regards service user and carer involvement, particularly in chapters 5 and 16. Does it succeed in this? If not please suggest ways in which this area could be improved on.
Question 6:
Do you consider this revised Code of Practice will enable you to carry out your professional responsibilities effectively? Please feel free to comment on any areas of the Code which you consider could be improved in any way.
Contact
Email: Stephanie Robin
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback