Marine resources – remote electronic monitoring: consultation analysis

Analysis of public consultation on remote electronic monitoring (REM) as part of ensuring the long term sustainability of marine resources.


Annex 2: Frequency analysis of closed questions

Question 1

Table A2.1- Do you agree that Scottish vessels required to use REM in the Scottish zone should also have REM operational when operating outside of the Scottish zone?

Respondent Type

Yes

No

Don't Know

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Individuals

11

73%

3

20%

1

7%

15

100%

Organisations

15

48%

11

35%

5

16%

31

100%

Organisation type

Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry)

5

25%

10

50%

5

25%

20

100%

Conservation

6

86%

1

14%

0

0%

7

100%

Public Sector

2

100%

0

0%

0

0%

2

100%

Third Sector

1

100%

0

0%

0

0%

1

100%

Other

1

100%

0

0%

0

0%

1

100%

Total

26

57%

14

30%

6

13%

46

100%

Question 2

Table A2.2- Do you foresee any barriers to vessels meeting the costs associated with the REM systems themselves? This includes upfront and ongoing costs.

Respondent Type

Yes

No

Don't Know

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Individuals

7

47%

4

27%

4

27%

15

100%

Organisations

22

73%

5

17%

3

10%

30

100%

Organisation type

Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry)

17

85%

2

10%

1

5%

20

100%

Conservation

3

50%

2

33%

1

17%

6

100%

Public Sector

2

100%

0

0%

0

0%

2

100%

Third Sector

0

0%

0

0%

1

100%

1

100%

Other

0

0%

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Total

29

64%

9

20%

7

16%

45

100%

Question 3

Table A2.3- Are you aware of any issues we need to take account of when we apply REM across all pelagic fishing fleets fishing in Scottish waters on a level playing field basis?

Respondent Type

Yes

No

Don't Know

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Individuals

4

29%

6

43%

4

29%

14

100%

Organisations

10

48%

2

10%

9

43%

21

100%

Organisation type

Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry)

7

58%

0

0%

5

42%

12

100%

Conservation

2

40%

1

20%

2

40%

5

100%

Public Sector

1

50%

0

0%

1

50%

2

100%

Third Sector

0

0%

0

0%

1

100%

1

100%

Other

0

0%

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Total

14

40%

8

23%

13

37%

35

100%

Question 4

Table A2.4- Do you agree with the definition of pelagic vessels provided and are there any unintended consequences from using this definition?

Respondent Type

Yes

No

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

Individuals

5

50%

5

50%

10

100%

Organisations

12

60%

8

40%

20

100%

Organisation type

Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry)

6

50%

6

50%

12

100%

Conservation

3

60%

2

40%

5

100%

Public Sector

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Third Sector

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Other

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Total

17

57%

13

43%

30

100%

Question 6

Table A2.5- Do you agree with the scientific and compliance benefits of REM for the pelagic fleet as set out in this document? Are there other benefits which you can consider, including to industry, the environment, or local communities?

Respondent Type

Yes

No

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

Individuals

9

75%

3

25%

12

100%

Organisations

16

73%

6

27%

22

100%

Organisation type

Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry)

7

58%

5

42%

12

100%

Conservation

6

86%

1

14%

7

100%

Public Sector

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Third Sector

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Other

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Total

25

74%

9

26%

34

100%

Question 7

Table A2.6- Do you agree that the system as outlined in section 3.4.2 (System specification) should be able to meet the benefits described in Section 3.3?

Respondent Type

Yes

No

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

Individuals

9

75%

3

25%

12

100%

Organisations

17

71%

7

29%

24

100%

Organisation type

Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry)

10

71%

4

29%

14

100%

Conservation

5

71%

2

29%

7

100%

Public Sector

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Third Sector

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Other

0

0%

1

100%

1

100%

Total

26

72%

10

28%

36

100%

Question 8

Table A2.7- Do you foresee any specific operational problems with the system specification set out within the document?

Respondent Type

Yes

No

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

Individuals

5

45%

6

55%

11

100%

Organisations

15

65%

8

35%

23

100%

Organisation type

Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry)

10

77%

3

23%

13

100%

Conservation

4

57%

3

43%

7

100%

Public Sector

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Third Sector

0

0%

1

100%

1

100%

Other

0

0%

1

100%

1

100%

Total

20

59%

14

41%

34

100%

Question 9

Table A2.8- Do you believe that we should require net sensor data as part of the system specification at this point?

Respondent Type

Yes

No

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

Individuals

7

58%

5

42%

12

100%

Organisations

14

67%

7

33%

21

100%

Organisation type

Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry)

5

45%

6

55%

11

100%

Conservation

6

86%

1

14%

7

100%

Public Sector

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Third Sector

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Other

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Total

21

64%

12

36%

33

100%

Question 10

Table A2.9- Are you aware of any issues we need to take account of when we apply REM requirements consistently across all scallop dredge vessels in the Scottish zone, regardless of scallop species being targeted or number of dredges being deployed?

Respondent Type

Yes

No

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

Individuals

8

62%

5

38%

13

100%

Organisations

10

48%

11

52%

21

100%

Organisation type

Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry)

4

40%

6

60%

10

100%

Conservation

4

57%

3

43%

7

100%

Public Sector

2

100%

0

0%

2

100%

Third Sector

0

0%

1

100%

1

100%

Other

0

0%

1

100%

1

100%

Total

18

53%

16

47%

34

100%

Question 11

Table A2.10- Do you agree that REM requirements on vessels carrying and/or deploying scallop dredge gear in the Scottish zone should be broadly aligned to existing REM requirements provided for in Regulation 6 of the 2017 Order?

Respondent Type

Yes

No

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

Individuals

6

67%

3

33%

9

100%

Organisations

18

86%

3

14%

21

100%

Organisation type

Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry)

11

100%

0

0%

11

100%

Conservation

4

57%

3

43%

7

100%

Public Sector

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Third Sector

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Other

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Total

24

80%

6

20%

30

100%

Question 12

Table A2.11- Do you consider that any other changes (in addition to the ability to record footage to a minimum of 5 Frames per Second) should be made to the REM system specification?

Respondent Type

Yes

No

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

Individuals

6

60%

4

40%

10

100%

Organisations

14

78%

4

22%

18

100%

Organisation type

Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry)

5

56%

4

44%

9

100%

Conservation

5

100%

0

0%

5

100%

Public Sector

2

100%

0

0%

2

100%

Third Sector

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Other

1

100%

0

0%

1

100%

Total

20

71%

8

29%

28

100%

Contact

Email: ffm@gov.scot

Back to top