Marine resources – remote electronic monitoring: consultation analysis
Analysis of public consultation on remote electronic monitoring (REM) as part of ensuring the long term sustainability of marine resources.
2. About the respondents and responses
Number of responses received
2.1. A total of 48 responses were received. A vast majority of consultation responses were submitted through the online portal, with the remainder submitted to the Scottish Government directly, for example, by email. Where this was the case, the Scottish Government passed all correspondence directly to the Diffley Partnership for review and logging.
2.2. Diffley Partnership exported responses from Citizen Space into Microsoft Excel and manually added non-Citizen Space responses for data cleaning, review, and analysis.
About the respondents
2.3. A total of 48 responses were received (all valid i.e., no duplicate or blank responses), a majority of which were submitted by organisations (69%) (see Table 1).
Respondent Type |
n |
Proportion |
---|---|---|
Individuals |
15 |
31% |
Organisations |
33 |
69% |
Total |
48 |
100% |
2.4. A variety of organisations responded to the consultation. The respondent categories agreed with Scottish Government are as follows:
- Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry)
- Conservation
- Public Sector
- Third Sector
- Other
2.5. Table 2 below shows the number of respondents by category.
Respondent Type |
n |
---|---|
Fishing organisations (including representative bodies and fishing industry) |
22 |
Conservation |
7 |
Public Sector |
2 |
Third Sector |
1 |
Other |
1 |
Total |
33 |
Contact
Email: ffm@gov.scot
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback