Tackling child poverty delivery plan 2022-2026 - annex 2: child poverty evaluation strategy - updated

This annex to Best Start, Bright Futures: the second tackling child poverty delivery plan 2022 to 2026 sets out the updated evaluation approach to tackling child poverty.


Evidence Based Approach To Tackling Child Poverty

The Child Poverty (Scotland) Act 2017 ('the Act'): requires the Scottish Government and its partners to meet, by 2030, the four ambitious targets set out in the Act:

Figure 1: Child poverty targets
Target 1: Fewer than 10% of children living in families in relative poverty. This means fewer than one in ten children living in households on low incomes, compared to the average UK household. 

Target 2: Fewer than 5% of children living in families in absolute poverty. This means fewer than one in twenty children living in low income households where living standards are not increasing. 

Target 3: Fewer than 5% of children living in families living in combined low income and material deprivation. This means fewer than one in twenty children living in low income households who can’t afford basic essential goods and services.

Target 4: Fewer than 5% of children living in families in persistent poverty. This means fewer than one in twenty children living in  households in poverty for three years out of four.

In order to meet these targets, the Scottish Government is required to produce three delivery plans in the period to 2030, setting out action to deliver progress against the targets. The first delivery plan was published in 2018, this report accompanies the second delivery plan in 2022 and the final one will be published in 2026. Annual progress reports, describing the measures taken and the effect of those measures on progress towards meeting the child poverty targets are also required.[1]

To measure progress towards the targets, a theory of change was established based on two key concepts: the drivers of poverty and the approach to identifying those family types at higher risk poverty.

Drivers of poverty

Three drivers which can lead to measureable improvement in income for low income households were identified; increasing income from employment, reducing costs of living, and increasing income from social security and benefits in kind.

Our experience and consideration of the evidence have shown that this driver approach is appropriate and working. As a result we will continue this approach for the second delivery plan. However, one lesson from the first delivery plan is the importance of looking across the drivers to ensure there is balance, for example between the impacts of policies to increase income from employment and the impact of policies to increase income from social security payments. This is necessary to ensure that longer term, unintended or negative outcomes are minimised for children in poverty and their families.

Figure 2: Child poverty drivers
There are three child poverty drivers: income from employment, costs of living, and income from social security and benefits in kind. 

There are certain factors that impact on these drivers. Hourly pay, hours worked per household, skills and qualifications, labour market, and availability of affordable and accessible transport and childcare all impact on income from employment. In terms of cost of living, there are housing costs, other costs of living, debts, cost of transport and childcare as well as enablers (access to affordable credit, internet access, savings and assets). When looking at the driver of income from social security and benefits in kind, we look at the value of the benefits, reach of the benefits, eligibility criteria and take up.

Priority families

The second concept is the priority families. The priority family concept arose from analysis to see if we could better understand who was most impacted by poverty. This was important to help identify system barriers and blockages and to develop and tailor appropriate policies for different family types. The six identified priority groups, which are at a higher than average risk of poverty, comprise around 90% of all children in poverty.

Experience during the first plan period and further examination of statistics shows that these priority families continue to be at a higher risk of poverty.

Figure 3: Priority families most at a higher risk of poverty (Source: Family Resources Survey 2017-20)
Lone parents: 38% of children in relative poverty
Disabled: 29% of children in relative poverty
Minority ethnic: 38% of children in relative poverty
Mothers aged under 25: 55% of children in relative poverty
Children aged under 1: 34% of children in relative poverty
Three or more children: 32% of children in relative poverty

However there is also a need for more nuanced consideration of the significant intersectionality within the groups, so it is often helpful to think of them as a lens rather than a discrete group. Families with experience of multiple disadvantage are often among those deepest in poverty and who face particularly challenging journeys to get out. Most of these families will also fall into at least one of our priority family groups. This matters to child poverty because the barriers they face and the support they need will be significant and highly specific.

Contact

Email: TCPU@gov.scot

Back to top