Cass Review – implications for Scotland: findings report

Annex A: Policy and Clinical Stakeholder Engagement

In constructing this response to the Cass Review, we have sought a range of contextual information and views from relevant experts, commissioners and clinicians. This review does not necessarily represent their views fully but was shaped by their input. This included but was not limited to;

• Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office
• Scottish Government Directorate for Chief Nursing Officer
• Directorate for Chief Operating Officer, NHS Scotland – Scottish Government
• Directorate for Population Health, Scottish Government
• Directorate for Health and Social Care Finance, Digital and Governance Scottish Government
• Directorate for Mental Health, Scottish Government - Children, Young People, Relationships and Families
• Scottish Government Directorate for Children and Families
  • Improving Health and Wellbeing Division - Maternal and Infant Health, Supporting Maternal and Child Wellbeing, Supporting Disabled Children and Young People
  • Office of the Chief Social Work Adviser
  • Children’s Rights, Protection and Justice Division
  • Care Experience and Whole Family Wellbeing Division
• The University of Glasgow, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health
• Healthcare Improvement Scotland
• NHS Education for Scotland
• NHS National Services Scotland
• NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Lothian Health Boards
• The Royal College of Paediatric and Child Health
• The Directorate for Learning, Scottish Government
• Service clinicians including psychologists, psychiatrists and paediatricians.
• The National Gender Identity Healthcare Reference Group