Further or higher education - student financial support for asylum seekers: child rights and wellbeing impact assessment
Child rights and wellbeing impact assessment (CRWIA) for the provision of support for young unaccompanied asylum seekers and children of asylum seekers wishing to undertake a course of further or higher education in Scotland.
CRWIA Stage 2 – Assessment of Impact and Compatibility
1. What evidence have you used to inform your assessment? Identify any gaps in the evidence base, and set out how you will address these.
Insufficient evidence to break down in terms of age although anecdotal evidence from the Scottish Refugee Council suggested there were several hundred young accompanied asylum seeking children currently residing in Scotland.
Data on asylum seekers is provided by the Home Office on a UK wide level (Asylum and resettlement datasets - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)) and is not readily available broken down by those asylum seekers resident in Scotland.
HESA Data indicates that of all first degree entrants in Scottish Higher Education institutions, 41,220 were aged 16 – 24.
SFC Data indicates that of all FE students in Scottish colleges, 31,050 were aged 16 – 24.
In December 2022 it was confirmed that the Scottish Government has rehomed 7 asylum seekers for every 10,000 Scottish residents, working out to approximately between 3,500 and 4,000 based on Scottish population figures.
2. Evidence from stakeholders/Policy Colleagues
As noted above, the Scottish Government carried out a public consultation using the Citizen Space website: Scottish Government consultation - changes to student support residency criteria.
Within this consultation the Scottish Government posed the following question: “Should financial support beyond support already given through discretionary funds be extended to students who are currently ordinarily resident in Scotland and have sought asylum from the UK Home Office, but whose application is still pending?”
Of 131 respondents, 57 answered Yes, 50 answered No, 20 answered Don’t Know, and 4 did not answer. Whilst there was not overwhelming support for an extension from this one question, there was detailed evidence from relevant stakeholder groups, previously impacted students on the barriers faced for young unaccompanied asylum seekers, children of asylum seekers in continuing with their learner journey post- secondary education should their claim still be awaiting a decision.
The full analysis of the consultation exercise will be published shortly on the Scottish Government website (www.gov.scot) and Citizen Space (www.consult.gov.scot)
3. Evidence from children and young people
It is unknown how many children and young people formally responded to the consultation; however policy officials did engage with some young unaccompanied asylum seekers to hear their lived experience.
4. Analysis of the evidence
4.1 How have the findings outlined in questions 1-3 influenced the development of the relevant proposal?
From the evidence gathered, it was apparent that the students in question are at a particularly vulnerable point in their lives. These students will have had significant breaks in their education already and will reach the further or higher education stage only to have to freeze in place, potentially for multiple years, at a time when what they are allowed to do is significantly curtailed. Those students who are continuing on from secondary education in Scotland as a result of this change will benefit from having parity with their peers in accessing home fee places.
4.2 Assessing for compatibility against the UNCRC requirements (Guidance Section 2.2)
UNCRC Articles
What impact does/will your relevant proposal have on children’s rights (Please tick positive, negative or neutral)
Article 1 Definition of the child - Neutral
Article 2 Non-discrimination - Positive
Article 3 Best interests of the child - Positive
Article 4 Implementation of the Convention - Positive
Article 5 Parental guidance and a child’s evolving capacities - Neutral
Article 6 Life, survival and development - Neutral
Article 7 Birth registration, name, nationality, care - Neutral
Article 8 Protection and preservation of identity - Neutral
Article 9 Separation from parents - Neutral
Article 10 Family reunification - Neutral
Article 11 Abduction and non-return of children - Neutral
Article 12 Respect for the views of the child - Neutral
Article 13 Freedom of expression - Neutral
Article 14 Freedom of thought, belief and religion - Neutral
Article 15 Freedom of association - Neutral
Article 16 Right to privacy - Neutral
Article 17 Access to information from the media - Neutral
Article 18 Parental responsibilities and state assistance - Neutral
Article 19 Protection from violence, abuse and neglect - Neutral
Article 20 Children unable to live with their family - Neutral
Article 21 Adoption - Neutral
Article 22 Refugee children - Positive
Article 23 Children with a disability - Neutral
Article 24 Health and health services - Neutral
Article 25 Review of treatment in care - Neutral
Article 26 Social security - Neutral
Article 27 Adequate standard of living - Neutral
Article 28 Right to education - Positive
Article 29 Goals of education - Positive
Article 30 Children from minority or indigenous groups - Neutral
Article 31 Leisure, play and culture - Neutral
Article 32 Child labour - Neutral
Article 33 Drug abuse - Neutral
Article 34 Sexual exploitation - Neutral
Article 35 Abduction, sale and trafficking - Neutral
Article 36 Other forms of exploitation - Neutral
Article 37 Inhumane treatment and detention - Neutral
Article 38 War and armed conflicts - Neutral
Article 39 Recovery from trauma and reintegration - Neutral
Article 40 Juvenile justice - Neutral
Article 41 Respect for higher national standards - Neutral
Article 42 Knowledge of rights - Neutral
First optional protocol
Article 4 - Neutral
Article 5 - Neutral
Article 6 - Neutral
Article 7 - Neutral
Second Optional Protocol
Article 1 - Neutral
Article 2 - Neutral
Article 3 - Neutral
Article 4 - Neutral
Article 6 - Neutral
Article 7 - Neutral
Article 8 - Neutral
Article 9 - Neutral
Article 10 - Neutral
Article 11 - Neutral
5. Impact on children and young people
In relation to the UNCRC articles that you have ticked above, please explain how your relevant proposal will impact or currently impacts on individual or groups of children. Please give consideration to groups who may be considered at greatest risk of not having their right fulfilled.
Positive – This policy will have a positive impact in regards to right to education for young unaccompanied asylum seekers and children of asylum seekers who wish to enter Further or Higher Education in Scotland.
This will be of particular importance to those individuals who have entered the secondary education system in Scotland and wish to continue their learner journey alongside their peers whilst awaiting a decision on their asylum claim.
This policy will allow access to home fee status and tuition fee support only. Further analysis on the impact of living cost support for this group is required.
6. Negative Impact/Incompatibility
If negative impact is identified in Question 5 above, can you elaborate on this and explain why impact is or will be negative?
No negative impact was identified.
Are there any potential concerns about compatibility with the UNCRC requirements? Please explain these here.
No
7. Options for modification or mitigation of negative impact or incompatibility
N/A
8. Positive impact: Giving better or further effect to children’s rights in Scotland
This policy will have a positive impact in regards to right to education for young unaccompanied asylum seekers and children of asylum seekers who wish to enter Further or Higher Education in Scotland.
This will be of particular importance to those individuals who have entered the secondary education system in Scotland and wish to continue their learner journey alongside their peers whilst awaiting a decision on their asylum claim.
This policy will allow access to home fee status and tuition fee support only. Further analysis on the impact of living cost support for this group is required.
9. Impact on Wellbeing: does or will the relevant proposal contribute to the wellbeing of children and young people in Scotland? (Guidance Section 2.2)
Please tick all of the wellbeing indicators that are relevant to your proposal.
Safe - Growing up in an environment where a child or young person feels secure, nurtured, listened to and enabled to develop to their full potential. This includes freedom from abuse or neglect.
Yes
Healthy - Having the highest attainable standards of physical and mental health, access to suitable healthcare, and support in learning to make healthy and safe choices.
No
Achieving - Being supported and guided in learning and in the development of skills, confidence and self-esteem, at home, in school and in the community.
Yes
Nurtured - Growing, developing and being cared for in an environment which provides the physical and emotional security, compassion and warmth necessary for healthy growth and to develop resilience and a positive identity.
No
Active - Having opportunities to take part in activities such as play, recreation and sport, which contribute to healthy growth and development, at home, in school and in the community.
No
Respected - Being involved in and having their voices heard in decisions that affect their life, with support where appropriate.
No
Responsible - Having opportunities and encouragement to play active and responsible roles at home, in school and in the community, and where necessary, having appropriate guidance and supervision.
No
Included - Having help to overcome inequalities and being accepted as part of their family, school and community.
Yes
Contact
Email: SFS_Policy@gov.scot
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback