A Co-constructed and Co-produced Evaluation of the Anchor Project in Shetland

Section 6: Study Limitations, Data Gaps and Strengths

Prior to drawing together the key components of a theory of change in establishing similar services in other contexts it is important to consider the limitations, data gaps and strengths of this co-produced evaluation.

This qualitative interview-based and participatory study was undertaken over a 10-month period during 2023, and therefore represents a snapshot in the development of Anchor and services in Shetland. The team visited and were embedded for brief moments in the history of the Anchor project and recognise this poses some challenges. While attempts were made to have a more holistic view of Anchor, such an approach has limitations. The results capture a moment in time and thus may not be reflective of the final perceptions of participants. The number of participants was limited due to logistical challenges of recruitment of family members.

Our data are narratives and stories gathered using participants’ photos, conversations, written comments, participant generated data on flipcharts and field notes of discussions from workshops. A range of participants are represented in these findings which is a strength of the co-produced methods we employed. Such a diverse range of participants as contributors may raise questions about the rigour of these findings. However, the three researchers are all experienced academics with professional backgrounds in nursing (CK, FD) and social work (GS) and demonstrable records in planning, conducting, and disseminating robust research. Working together as a research team alongside the Shetland Anchor Project Team and key leaders, we have sought to produce a trustworthy and authentic characterisation of Anchor and its component parts. Co-production is increasingly recognised as desirable when it is important to hear the voices of key stakeholders and uncover embedded experiences and characteristics. We suggest the resonance of our findings to those connected to Anchor (Phase one and two) and the wide range of participants in Phase three, support our findings and interpretation.