Consultation to amend the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 to include Integration Joint Boards: EQIA
This Equality Impact Assessment evaluates the impacts of the policy aim to formalise the role of Integration Joint Boards in emergency planning by amending the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, ensuring their inclusion in groups considering planning for emergency scenarios.
Stage 3: Assessing the impacts and identifying opportunities to promote equality
Having considered the data and evidence gathered, this section requires considers the potential impacts – negative and positive – that the policy might have on each of the protected characteristics. It is important to remember the duty is also a positive one – which we must explore whether the policy offers the opportunity to promote equality and/or foster good relations.
Age | Positive | Negative | None | Reasons for your decision |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eliminating unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation | X | Although this will be the first time that Integration Joint Boards will be formal Category 1 responders under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, they have been involved in emergency planning as part of their roles as directors within the Health Boards and Local Authorities. There is already a duty as Scottish public sector organisations to consider age equalities within decision making and delivery of service. | ||
Advancing equality of opportunity | X | The Integration Joint Boards have strong third sector and community partnership engagement and working. These relationships are instrumental in the planning and delivery of services and have played a key role in the planning of emergency services with the Chief Officers utilising these relationships and the information provided through them. This role can only be strengthened with the Integration Joint Boards formally holding a Category 1 status alongside the Health Boards and Local Authorities. | ||
Promoting good relations among and between different age groups | X | The Integration Joint Boards status as a Category 1 responder under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 is unlikely to impact on the promotion of good relations between different age groups. |
Disability | Positive | Negative | None | Reasons for your decision |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eliminating unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation | X | Although this will be the first time that Integration Joint Boards will be formal Category 1 responders under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, they have been involved in emergency planning as part of their roles as directors within the Health Boards and Local Authorities. There is already a duty as Scottish public sector organisations to consider disability status equalities within decision making and delivery of service. | ||
Advancing equality of opportunity | X | The Integration Joint Boards have strong third sector and community partnership engagement and working. These relationships are instrumental in the planning and delivery of services and have played a key role in the planning of emergency services with the Chief Officers utilising these relationships and the information provided through them. This role can only be strengthened with the Integration Joint Boards formally holding a Category 1 status alongside the Health Boards and Local Authorities. | ||
Promoting good relations among and between disabled and non-disabled people | X | The Integration Joint Boards status as a Category 1 responder under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 is unlikely to impact on the promotion of good relations between disabled and non-disabled people. |
Sex | Positive | Negative | None | Reasons for your decision |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eliminating unlawful discrimination | X | Although this will be the first time that Integration Joint Boards will be formal Category 1 responders under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, they have been involved in emergency planning as part of their roles as directors within the Health Boards and Local Authorities. There is already a duty as Scottish public sector organisations to consider gender and inequality within decision making and delivery of service. | ||
Advancing equality of opportunity | X | The Integration Joint Boards have strong third sector and community partnership engagement and working. These relationships are instrumental in the planning and delivery of services and have played a key role in the planning of emergency services with the Chief Officers utilising these relationships and the information provided through them. This role can only be strengthened with the Integration Joint Boards formally holding a Category 1 status alongside the Health Boards and Local Authorities. | ||
Promoting good relations between men and women | X | The Integration Joint Boards status as a Category 1 responder under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 is unlikely to impact on the promotion of good relations between different genders. |
Pregnancy and Maternity | Positive | Negative | None | Reasons for your decision |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eliminating unlawful discrimination | X | Although this will be the first time that Integration Joint Boards will be formal Category 1 responders under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, they have been involved in emergency planning as part of their roles as directors within the Health Boards and Local Authorities. There is already a duty as Scottish public sector organisations to consider pregnancy and maternity inequality and/or discrimination within decision making and delivery of service. | ||
Advancing equality of opportunity | X | The Integration Joint Boards have strong third sector and community partnership engagement and working. These relationships are instrumental in the planning and delivery of services and have played a key role in the planning of emergency services with the Chief Officers utilising these relationships and the information provided through them. This role can only be strengthened with the Integration Joint Boards formally holding a Category 1 status alongside the Health Boards and Local Authorities. | ||
Promoting good relations | X | The Integration Joint Boards status as a Category 1 responder under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 is unlikely to impact on the promotion of good relations between pregnant women and other people. |
Gender reassignment | Positive | Negative | None | Reasons for your decision |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eliminating unlawful discrimination | X | Although this will be the first time that Integration Joint Boards will be formal Category 1 responders under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, they have been involved in emergency planning as part of their roles as directors within the Health Boards and Local Authorities. There is already a duty as Scottish public sector organisations to consider inequality or discrimination as a result of gender reassignment within decision making and delivery of service. | ||
Advancing equality of opportunity | X | The Integration Joint Boards have strong third sector and community partnership engagement and working. These relationships are instrumental in the planning and delivery of services and have played a key role in the planning of emergency services with the Chief Officers utilising these relationships and the information provided through them. This role can only be strengthened with the Integration Joint Boards formally holding a Category 1 status alongside the Health Boards and Local Authorities. | ||
Promoting good relations | X | The Integration Joint Boards status as a Category 1 responder under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 is unlikely to impact on the promotion of good relations between transgender people and others. |
Sexual orientation | Positive | Negative | None | Reasons for your decision |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eliminating unlawful discrimination | X | Although this will be the first time that Integration Joint Boards will be formal Category 1 responders under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, they have been involved in emergency planning as part of their roles as directors within the Health Boards and Local Authorities. There is already a duty as Scottish public sector organisations to consider sexual orientation equalities within decision making and delivery of service. | ||
Advancing equality of opportunity | X | The Integration Joint Boards have strong third sector and community partnership engagement and working. These relationships are instrumental in the planning and delivery of services and have played a key role in the planning of emergency services with the Chief Officers utilising these relationships and the information provided through them. This role can only be strengthened with the Integration Joint Boards formally holding a Category 1 status alongside the Health Boards and Local Authorities. | ||
Promoting good relations | X | The Integration Joint Boards status as a Category 1 responder under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 is unlikely to impact on the promotion of good relations between people of different sexual orientation. |
Race | Positive | Negative | None | Reasons for your decision |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eliminating unlawful discrimination | X | Although this will be the first time that Integration Joint Boards will be formal Category 1 responders under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, they have been involved in emergency planning as part of their roles as directors within the Health Boards and Local Authorities. There is already a duty as Scottish public sector organisations to consider race inequalities or discrimination within decision making and delivery of service. | ||
Advancing equality of opportunity | X | The Integration Joint Boards have strong third sector and community partnership engagement and working. These relationships are instrumental in the planning and delivery of services and have played a key role in the planning of emergency services with the Chief Officers utilising these relationships and the information provided through them. This role can only be strengthened with the Integration Joint Boards formally holding a Category 1 status alongside the Health Boards and Local Authorities. | ||
Promoting good race relations | X | The Integration Joint Boards status as a Category 1 responder under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 is unlikely to impact on the promotion of good race relations. |
Religion or belief | Positive | Negative | None | Reasons for your decision |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eliminating unlawful discrimination | X | Although this will be the first time that Integration Joint Boards will be formal Category 1 responders under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, they have been involved in emergency planning as part of their roles as directors within the Health Boards and Local Authorities. There is already a duty as Scottish public sector organisations to consider inequality as a result of religion or belief within decision making and delivery of service. | ||
Advancing equality of opportunity | X | The Integration Joint Boards have strong third sector and community partnership engagement and working. These relationships are instrumental in the planning and delivery of services and have played a key role in the planning of emergency services with the Chief Officers utilising these relationships and the information provided through them. This role can only be strengthened with the Integration Joint Boards formally holding a Category 1 status alongside the Health Boards and Local Authorities. | ||
Promoting good relations | X | The Integration Joint Boards status as a Category 1 responder under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 is unlikely to impact on the promotion of good relations between people of religion and belief and others. |
Marriage and Civil Partnership[2] | Positive | Negative | None | Reasons for your decision |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eliminating unlawful discrimination | X | Although this will be the first time that Integration Joint Boards will be formal Category 1 responders under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, they have been involved in emergency planning as part of their roles as directors within the Health Boards and Local Authorities. There is already a duty as Scottish public sector organisations to consider marital or civil partnership status equalities within decision making and delivery of service. |
Contact
Email: Paula.Richardson@gov.scot
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback