Designing and Evaluating Behaviour Change Interventions
Easy-to-use guidance on designing and evaluating any behaviour change intervention using the 5-step approach
AN UPDATED VERSION OF THIS GUIDANCE IS AVAILABLE HERE http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2016/05/1967
Step 2: Review the evidence
For best results, use a range of evidence
To draw the most robust conclusions about ‘what works,’ and why, you should take account of evidence produced through a range of methods. For example, quantitative studies (including the results of RCTs) might help you to establish what usually works and for whom. Qualitative work (e.g. interviews with users who 'succeed' and ‘fail’ and/or with practitioners) might help you to understand the processes through which interventions work or don’t work and consider why barriers may exist to achieving your aims.
TIP If you are short on time and resources, systematic and/or literature reviews are an excellent source of evidence. They often analyse both quantitative and qualitative studies on a particular topic and should do the work of summarising all this evidence for you.
Finding evidence
When time and resources, are limited, evidence reviews (also called systematic reviews or literature reviews) are a realistic solution — enabling an overview of the evidence in a relatively short time.
Online databases and archives are the most convenient means through which to locate evidence reviews. The following slides provide links to topic-specific databases and some examples of individual evidence reviews in health, education, environment and sport behaviour change aims. However, the following databases can be of general help in locating relevant evidence:
Search academic databases: | Search government archives: |
http://www.mendeley.com/dashboard/ http://scholar.google.co.uk/ |
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/Recent https://www.gov.uk/government/publications |
TIP Try searching for 'evidence/literature/systematic review' + your behaviour change aim (i.e. 'smoking cessation' or 'increase recycling').
* A = Archive of relevant publications, P = specific publication
A fictitious example
How the evidence base supports an intervention to promote young women’s physical activity
Intervention (what are we doing?) |
Evidence (why are we doing this?) |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact
Email: Catherine Bisset
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback