Estimating the impacts of US tariffs on UK exports of single malt Scotch whisky
This discussion paper aims to estimate the impact of US tariffs on UK exports of single malt Scotch whisky between Q4 2019 – Q4 2020 using the novel synthetic control method.
Annex D – Final Results
Monthly Specifications
The table below shows results for all tested specifications without population interpolation or consumption disaggregation. Generally, results were similar whether this was done or not.[58]
Dependent variable* |
Lag | Estimated monthly tariff effect |
p-value | 26/29 confidence set (~90%) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit(a) | Prop. | Lower | Upper | |||
% | % | % | ||||
Value | No lag | -0.01 | -7.1 | 0.517 | -87.9 | +19.4 |
Value | First lag | -0.02 | -17.4 | 0.207 | -87.0 | +1.2 |
Value | Seasonal lag | -0.02 | -18.1 | 0.172 | -88.8 | +1.4 |
Value | First and seas. lag | -0.02 | -17.2 | 0.207 | -86.4 | +1.5 |
Quantity | No lag | -0.40* | -16.5 | 0.103 | -62.5 | -0.8 |
Quantity | First lag | -0.24 | -10.7 | 0.448 | -34.9 | +16.9 |
Quantity | Seasonal lag | -0.21 | -11.4 | 0.655 | -32.5 | +26.6 |
Quantity | First and seas. lag | -0.24 | -12.9 | 0.448 | -34.8 | +17.5 |
Price | No lag | -2.98 | -6.2 | 0.517 | -38.0 | +29.6 |
Price | First lag | -5.72 | -11.9 | 0.414 | -56.6 | +3.8 |
Price | Seasonal lag | -5.88 | -12.2 | 0.414 | -57.5 | +3.8 |
Price | First and seas. lag | -5.72 | -11.9 | 0.414 | -56.7 | +4.0 |
Without population interpolation or consumption disaggregation (results for these specifications were similar if not identical). Key: (a) Logged value (£/cap), quantity (millilitres of pure alcohol / cap) and price (£/LPA); *** p < 2/29; ** p < 3/29; * p < 4/29.
Quarterly Specifications
The same synthetic control method was applied on a quarterly trade series, with the tariff assumed to be introduced in Q4 2019. Using a quarterly series may limit the effects of seasonality and would more closely align with the quarterly consumption series. The monthly interest rate and exchange rates were averaged over the quarter, while trade value/quantity was summed. Quarterly population interpolation was also explored but not found to have a major impact.
While the quarterly series may limit seasonality, it would also reduce the power of any hypothesis test by reducing the number of observations. The total number of observations for each country decreases from 132 months to 44 quarters, with only 5 post-tariff observations (2019 Q4 to 2020 Q4).
Although the estimated quarterly effect of the tariff on the export value and quantity appears to be strictly negative at a 10% significance level, the lower bound for the value confidence set is still somewhat non-informative at [-100.0%, -4.7%].
Table D2. Final set of results for quarterly specifications
Dependent variable | Lag | Estimated quarterly tariff effect |
p-value | 26/29 confidence set (~90%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit(a) | Prop. | Lower | Upper | |||
% | % | % | ||||
Value | No lag | -0.03 | -8.5 | 0.448 | -100.0 | (a) |
Value | First lag | -0.06** | -18.3 | 0.069 | -100.0 | -4.7 |
Value | Seasonal lag | -0.06** | -18.9 | 0.069 | -100.0 | -5.2 |
Value | First and seas. lag | -0.06** | -18.3 | 0.069 | -100.0 | -4.7 |
Quantity | No lag | -1.38** | -20.2 | 0.069 | -69.4 | -4.6 |
Quantity | First lag | -0.64** | -10.3 | 0.069 | -19.6 | -9.5 |
Quantity | Seasonal lag | -0.57** | -9.0 | 0.069 | (b) | (b) |
Quantity | First and seas. lag | -0.64*** | -10.2 | 0.034 | -19.2 | -9.8 |
Price | No lag | -3.89 | -8.3 | 0.552 | -49.7 | +32.8 |
Price | First lag | -4.86 | -10.2 | 0.345 | -64.7 | +17.9 |
Price | Seasonal lag | -4.27 | -9.1 | 0.483 | -62.5 | +25.5 |
Price | First and seas. lag | -4.86 | -10.2 | 0.345 | -64.7 | +17.9 |
Without population interpolation (results for these specifications were similar if not identical). Key: (a) Logged value (£/cap), quantity (millilitres of pure alcohol / cap) and price (£/LPA); (b) no lower/upper bound was found due to lower power; *** p < 2/29; ** p < 3/29; * p < 4/29.
Frequency | Dependent variable |
Estimated monthly or quarterly tariff effect | p-value | 26/29 confidence set (~90%) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit(a) | Prop. % | Lower % | Upper % | |||
Quarterly | Value | -0.06** | -18.3 | 0.069 | -100.0 | -4.7 |
Monthly | Value | -0.02 | -17.4 | 0.207 | -87.0 | +1.2 |
Quarterly | Quantity | -0.64** | -10.3 | 0.069 | -19.6 | -9.5 |
Monthly | Quantity | -0.24 | -10.7 | 0.448 | -34.9 | +16.9 |
Quarterly | Price | -4.86 | -10.2 | 0.345 | -64.7 | +17.9 |
Monthly | Price | -5.72 | -11.9 | 0.414 | -56.6 | +3.8 |
Without population interpolation or consumption disaggregation. Key: (a) Logged value (£/cap), quantity (millilitres of pure alcohol / cap) and price (£/LPA); ** p < 3/29.
Contact
Email: agric.stats@gov.scot
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback