European Union, Norway and the United Kingdom - fisheries consultations: agreed records 2023
Agreed records of consultations from meetings of delegations from the United Kingdom, Norway and the European Union, held between November and December 2022 on the joint management of shared North Sea stocks.
Annexes
- annex I
- annex II
- annex III
- annex IV
- annex V
- annex VI
- annex VII
- annex VIII
- annex IX
- annex X
- table 1
- table 2
- table 3
Annex I
Conditions for fisheries by the Parties in 2023
I. Joint stocks
1. The Total Allowable Catches (TACs) for the stocks mentioned in Table 1 for 2023 shall be as indicated in that table. If ICES make new scientific recommendations, the Parties will review these TACs.
2. The TACs referred to in paragraph 1 shall be divided between the Parties as indicated in Table 1.
3. Each Party shall inform the other Parties of allocations granted to a third country for fishing of the stocks referred to in Table 1.
4. The Parties shall supply each other with monthly catch statistics for fishing on the stocks referred to in Table 1 by their own vessels. Communication of these statistics for the preceding month shall take place at the latest on the last day of each month.
II. Fishery regulations
1. The Parties will inform each other of their respective fishery regulations applicable in the North Sea.
2. A Party intending to introduce or amend fishery regulations applicable to vessels of the other Parties shall duly inform the other Parties of such intentions.
Annex II
Inter-annual quota flexibility
The inter-annual quota flexibility scheme applicable to the jointly managed stocks discussed during these consultations shall be terminated if:
- the spawning stock biomass is estimated to be below the precautionary reference point Bpa in the TAC year and the fishing mortality is estimated to be above the precautionary reference point Fpa in the intermediate year, or
- the SSB is estimated to be below Bpa in both the TAC year and the year thereafter
Each Party may transfer unutilised quota from the TAC year to be caught in the following year. Each Party may transfer up to 10% of its total quota allocation. This quantity cannot be transferred further in subsequent years.
Each Party may authorise fishing by its vessels beyond its total quota allocation for the TAC year by up to 10%. The quantity fished beyond the allocated quota shall be deducted from the Party’s allocation for the year after the TAC year.
The Delegations agreed that in order to ensure transparency in the operation of inter-annual quota flexibility, more detailed information on catch utilisation shall be exchanged.
To note, the TAC year is the year for which the agreed TAC applies, and the intermediate year is the year prior to the TAC year.
Annex III
Seasonal area closures to protect spawning cod
The following areas in the table below will be closed for all gears excluding pelagic gears (purse seine and trawl), for the identified time period:
Time limited closures |
||||
No |
Area name |
Co-ordinates |
Time period |
Additional comment |
1 |
Stanhope ground |
60o 10N - 02o 00E |
1 January to 30 April |
|
2 |
Long Hole |
59o 07.35N - 0o 31.04W |
1 January to 31 March |
|
3 |
Coral edge |
58o 51.70N - 03o 26.70E |
1 January to 28 February |
|
4 |
Papa Bank |
59o 56N - 03o 08W |
1 January to 15 March |
|
5 |
Foula Deeps |
60o 17.5N - 01o 45W |
1 November to 31 December |
|
6 |
Egersund Bank |
58o 07.40N - 04o 33.0E |
1 January to 31 March |
(10 x 25 nm) |
7 |
East of Fair Isle |
59o 40N - 01o 23W |
1 January to 15 March |
|
8 |
West Bank |
57o 15N - 05o 01E |
1 February to 15 March |
(18 x 4 nm) |
9 |
Revet |
57o 28.43N - 08o 05.66E |
1 February to 15 March |
(1.5 x 49 nm) |
10 |
Rabarberen |
57o 47.00N - 11o 04.00E |
1 February to 15 March |
East of Skagen (2.7x4 nm) |
Annex IV
Terms of reference for a working group on monitoring, control and surveilance (MCS) of fisheries on joint stocks from 2019 to 2024
The objective of the Working Group is to co-operate, exchange information and best practices related to control of joint stocks, in mutual interest of securing continued responsible fisheries and ensuring the long-term conservation and sustainable exploitation of the marine living resources for which the Parties are responsible.
The scope of the Working Group is mainly fisheries for cod, haddock, saithe, whiting, plaice and herring in the North Sea.
The MCS Working Group should:
1. Compare existing inspection practices and guidelines with the view to recommend best practices for:
- sea inspections (e.g., gear, catch composition, discard ban/landing obligation)
- landing inspections
2. Compare relevant topics with the view to, as appropriate, recommend best practices such as:
- weighing requirements, including sampling plans etc.
- logbook, landings, sales documentation, and traceability requirements
3. Conduct missions (exchange of inspectors) to identify inspection best practices, weighing and documentation practices as appropriate.
4. Consider the need and topics for training or workshops for inspectors taking advantage of other fora or meetings.
5. Exchange experience on other relevant issues such as discard ban/landing obligation, post landing inspections, procedures and practices, including as regards enforcement measures further to the identification of violations.
6. Exchange experience on existing risk assessment methods and consider the possibility to share relevant output data related to risk assessment (identified risks and risk handling).
In addition, the NS MCS WG should also focus on monitoring, inspection and surveillance for the control of the cod and cod-related fisheries in the North Sea to ensure compliance with technical measures and catch registration obligations.
If there are any other relevant issues, which the Working Group believes would result in a more efficient Monitoring, Control and Surveillance of fisheries in the North Sea, the Working Group could explore these as appropriate.
Annex V
Tentative work plan for the MCS WG North Sea
Task |
2019 |
2020 / 2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
|
Compare |
- |
|
Recommend best practice |
- |
|
Compare |
- |
|
Recommend best practice |
- |
|
- |
- |
Compare |
Recommend best practice |
|
|
- |
- |
Compare |
Recommend best practice |
- |
|
Training TBD |
Training TBD |
Training TBD |
Training TBD |
Training TBD |
|
Missions TBD |
Missions TBD |
Missions TBD |
Missions TBD |
Missions TBD |
|
- |
- |
Compare |
Recommend best practice |
- |
|
Exchange experience and exchange relevant output data (strategic level) |
Exchange experience and exchange relevant output data (strategic level) |
Exchange experience and exchange relevant output data (strategic level) |
Exchange experience and exchange relevant output data (strategic and tactical level) |
Exchange experience and exchange relevant output data (strategic and tactical level) |
Annex VI
Terms of reference for a working group on hake
Terms of Reference for a Working Group on the distribution of hake (Merluccius merluccius) in the Greater North Sea, Celtic Seas, the Northern Bay of Biscay and adjacent waters.
The objective of the Working Group is to collect and collate information on the entire geographical distribution of all life stages of hake (Northern stock), based on internationally recognised data collection methods and on the distribution of catches from this stock.
The Working Group shall:
1. Present currently available fishery independent data on the geographical distribution on an annual survey basis for all life stages (biomass and abundance or their appropriate proxies) at the highest level of spatial resolution possible and coded by relevant ICES Areas and national fisheries jurisdiction and international waters since year 1987, or for an alternative period if so decided by the Working Group.
2. Describe/evaluate the quality, coverage and utility of the survey data for the purposes of assessing the distribution of the stock in time and space, consistent with standards acceptable to the Working Group, including listing all the scientific surveys which are available for determining the distribution of the stock or which are carried out by the Parties.
3. For each coastal State, present total annual catch data by month and ICES statistical rectangle from 1987-2020, and by the respective zones of national fisheries jurisdiction and international waters as precisely as the data allow since 1987, or for an alternative period if so decided by the Working Group.
4. Describe the quality, coverage and utility of the catch data for the purposes of assessing the distribution of the stock in time and space.
5. Compile the management measures, as provided by fisheries managers, adopted by the Parties for the stock, such as catch limitations and quota schemes (including quota uptake levels), as well as any management measures which would have an impact on such catch limitations.
6. Present a description of the fleet segments involved in the fisheries of the stock by each Party since year 1987, or for an alternative period if so decided by the Working Group.
The Working Group shall be composed of scientific experts from the Coastal States. Managers will provide the Working Group with the necessary material to document the management measures.
Annex VII
Terms of reference for a working group on Norway Pout
Terms of Reference for a Working Group on the distribution of Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii) in Subarea 4 (North Sea) and Division 3.a (Skagerrak and Kattegat) and adjacent waters.
The objective of the Working Group is to collect and collate information on the entire geographical distribution of all life stages of Norway pout, based on internationally recognised data collection methods and on the distribution of catches from this stock.
The Working Group shall:
1. Present currently available fishery independent data on the geographical distribution on an annual survey basis for all life stages (biomass and abundance or their appropriate proxies) by relevant ICES Areas and national fisheries jurisdiction since year 1987, or for an alternative period if so decided by the Working Group.
2. Describe/evaluate the quality, coverage and utility of the survey data for the purposes of assessing the distribution of the stock in time and space, consistent with standards acceptable to the Working Group, including listing all the scientific surveys which are available for determining the distribution of the stock or which are carried out by the Parties.
3. For each coastal State, present total annual catch data by month and ICES statistical rectangle from 1987-2021, and by the respective zones of national fisheries jurisdiction as precisely as the data allow since 1987, or for an alternative period if so decided by the Working Group.
4. Describe the quality, coverage and utility of the catch data for the purposes of assessing the distribution of the stock in time and space.
5. Compile the management measures, as provided by fisheries managers, adopted by the Parties for the stock, such as catch limitations and quota schemes (including quota uptake levels), as well as any management measures which would have an impact on such catch limitations.
6. Present a description of the fleet segments involved in the fisheries of the stock by each Party since year 1987, or for an alternative period if so decided by the Working Group.
The Working Group shall be composed of scientific experts from the Coastal States. Managers will provide the Working Group with the necessary material to document the management measures.
Annex VIII
Terms of reference for a working group on Anglerfish
Terms of Reference for a Working Group on the distribution of Anglerfish (Lophius budegassa, Lophius piscatorius) in subareas 4 and 6, and in Division 3.a (North Sea, Rockall and West of Scotland, Skagerrak and Kattegat).
The objective of the Working Group is to collect and collate information on the entire geographical distribution of all life stages of the two species of Anglerfish, based on internationally recognised data collection methods and on the distribution of catches from this stock.
The Working Group shall:
1. Present currently available fishery independent data on the geographical distribution on an annual survey basis for all life stages (biomass and abundance or their appropriate proxies) at the highest level of spatial resolution possible and coded by relevant ICES Areas and national fisheries jurisdiction and international waters since year 1987, or for an alternative period if so decided by the Working Group.
2. Describe/evaluate the quality, coverage and utility of the survey data for the purposes of assessing the distribution and migration of the stock in time and space, consistent with standards acceptable to the Working Group, including listing all the scientific surveys which are available for determining the distribution of the stock or which are carried out by the Parties.
3. For each coastal State, present total annual catch data by ICES statistical rectangle from 1987-2021, and by the respective zones of national fisheries jurisdiction and international waters as precisely as the data allow since 1987 or for an alternative period if so decided by the Working Group.
4. Describe the quality, coverage and utility of the catch data and fishing effort data for the purposes of assessing the distribution of the stock in time and space.
5. Compile the management measures, as provided by fisheries managers, adopted by the Parties for the stock, such as catch limitations and quota schemes (including quota uptake levels), as well as any management measures which would have an impact on such catch limitations.
6. Present a description of the fleet segments involved in the fisheries of the stock by each Party since year 1987 or for an alternative period if so decided by the Working Group.
The Working Group shall composed of scientific experts from the Coastal States. Managers will provide the Working Group with the necessary material to document the management measures.
Annex IX
Terms of reference for a working group on notification and authorisation of fishing vessels for 2023
The Delegations agreed that the Working Group on Notification and Authorisation of fishing vessels should meet before 31 May 2023 under the Terms of Reference described below. After that, the Working Group should meet as appropriate.
The Working Group shall carry out a scoping exercise to seek harmonisation of technical arrangements, procedures and specifications based on the UN/FLUX standard for the exchange between the Parties on how to notify vessels, request and grant fishing authorisations/licences, as well as any other domain identified by the Working Group during the scoping exercise.
The Working Group should submit its report to the Parties well in advance of the annual consultations for 2023.
Annex X
Joint request to ICES to advise on a long-term management plan for North Sea herring autumn spawners in North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat and Eastern English Channel
The European Union, Norway, and the United Kingdom jointly request ICES to advise on the long-term management strategies on North Sea autumn spawners herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel). A request is provided below.
ICES is requested to identify appropriate precautionary combinations in the format of Tables given in its response to the EU, Norway and the United Kingdom request to ICES to evaluate a multi-annual management strategy for herring (Clupea harengus) in Subarea 4 and divisions 3.a and 7.d, autumn spawners (North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat, eastern English Channel) (her.27.3a47d), using:
- a harvest control rule with a fishing mortality equal to the target F when SSB is at or above Btrigger
In the case that the SSB is forecast to be less than Btrigger at spawning time in the year for which the TAC is to be set, the TAC shall be fixed consistently with a fishing mortality that is given by: F = Ftarget*SSB/Btrigger
- a range of Btrigger from 800 000 to 1 700 00 tonnes with a range of target Fs up to FLim
- for the combinations above explore the following exploitation pattern scenarios:
1. Recent exploitation pattern (averaged over 2012-2021).
2. A historic exploitation pattern (averaged over 1998-2007).
3. Ranges of assumptions for values of F0-1 that vary between 0-0.1 independent from recent exploitation patterns for older fish (F2+).
4. The recent exploitation pattern with F0-1=0 from above contrasted with exploitation patterns moved to one year older and one year younger fish (three scenarios).
Long term goals:
- maximise yield
- minimising the risk of falling below Blim
- achieve stability of catches
All alternatives should be evaluated with and without a constraint on the inter-annual variation of TAC. When the rules would lead to a TAC, which deviates by more than 20% below or 25% above the TAC of the preceding year, the Parties shall fix a TAC that is respectively no more than 20% less or 25% more than the TAC of the preceding year. The TAC constraint shall not apply if the SSB at spawning time in the year for which the TAC is to be set is less or equal to Btrigger.
The constraint mechanism shall be tested separately from and in combination with 10% banking and borrowing mechanism. Banking and borrowing should be suspended when SSB is below Btrigger.
Evaluation and performance criteria
Each alternative shall be assessed in relation to how it performs in the short term (5 years), medium term (next 10 years) and long term (next 25 years) in relation to:
• _average SSB
• _average yield
• _indicator for year to year variability in SSB and yield
• _risk of SSB falling below Blim
Table 1
2023 quotas for jointly managed shared stocks in the North Sea
Species |
ICES Area |
TAC |
Sharing |
|||||
Norway |
EU |
UK |
||||||
% |
Tonnes |
% |
Tonnes |
% |
Tonnes |
|||
Cod |
4 |
21,652 |
17.00 |
3,681 |
37.36 |
8,089 |
45.64 |
9,882 |
Haddock |
4 |
58,402 |
23.00 |
13,432 |
13.20 |
7,709 |
63.80 |
37,261 |
Saithe |
4, 3.a |
53,374 |
52.00 |
27,755 |
36.41 |
19,433 |
11.59 |
6,186 |
Whiting |
4 |
34,294 |
10.00 |
3,429 |
27.57 |
9,455 |
62.43 |
21,410 |
Plaice |
4 |
132,922 |
7.00 |
9,305 |
66.53 |
88,433 |
26.47 |
35,184 |
Herring |
4, 7.d |
396,556 |
29.00 |
115,001 |
51.40 |
203,830 |
19.60 |
77,725 |
Table 2
2021 catch statistics for jointly managed shared stocks in the North Sea
Species |
ICES area |
EU catches |
Norway catches |
UK catches |
|||||||||
Fisheries jurisdiction |
Total |
Fisheries jurisdiction |
Total |
Fisheries jurisdiction |
Total |
||||||||
EU |
Norway |
UK |
EU |
Norway |
UK |
EU |
Norway |
UK |
|||||
Cod |
4 |
1,130 |
2,222 |
890 |
4,242 |
12 |
1,651 |
- |
1,663 |
15 |
6,426 |
6,441 |
|
Haddock |
4 |
850 |
624 |
1,337 |
2,811 |
2 |
2,215 |
- |
2,217 |
5 |
17,328 |
17,333 |
|
Saithe |
4, 3a |
933 |
5,356 |
11,334 |
17,622 |
14 |
20,446 |
- |
20,460 |
0 |
8,045 |
8,045 |
|
Whiting |
4 |
1,011 |
99 |
784 |
1,893 |
- |
1,098 |
- |
1,098 |
50 |
11,572 |
11,622 |
|
Plaice |
4 |
17,442 |
3,595 |
2,336 |
23,373 |
- |
24 |
- |
24 |
2,628 |
2,290 |
4,918 |
|
Herring |
4, 7d |
27,551 |
869 |
148,718 |
177,138 |
- |
95,059 |
- |
95,059 |
3 |
- |
69,582 |
69,585 |
Table 3
2022 provisional catch statistics for jointly managed fish stocks in the North Sea
Species |
ICES area |
EU catches (January to October 2022) |
Norway catches (January to November 2022) |
UK catches (January to November 2022) |
|||||||||
Fisheries jurisdiction |
Total |
Fisheries jurisdiction |
Total |
Fisheries jurisdiction |
Total |
||||||||
EU |
Norway |
UK |
EU |
Norway |
UK |
EU |
Norway |
UK |
|||||
Cod |
4 |
673 |
1,869 |
535 |
3,077 |
15 |
995 |
1,128 |
2,138 |
17 |
1,202 |
4,442 |
5,661 |
Haddock |
4 |
961 |
633 |
1,503 |
3,098 |
- |
2,208 |
296 |
2,504 |
120 |
3,290 |
18,920 |
22,330 |
Saithe |
4, 3a |
666 |
3,286 |
10,757 |
14,709 |
47 |
13,059 |
7,056 |
20,162 |
2 |
1,041 |
4,831 |
5,873 |
Whiting |
4 |
645 |
121 |
616 |
1,382 |
- |
12 |
897 |
909 |
76 |
706 |
8,702 |
9,484 |
Plaice |
4 |
10,455 |
2,616 |
1,132 |
14,203 |
- |
15 |
- |
15 |
2,424 |
750 |
960 |
4,134 |
Herring |
4, 7d |
3,249 |
2,699 |
166,608 |
172,556 |
- |
120,857 |
11,496 |
132,353 |
132 |
77,806 |
77,938 |
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback