Coronavirus (COVID-19) Family Nurse Partnership insights: evaluation report
Report commissioned to explore the experiences of the family nurses and clients in Scotland during the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes initial findings on service delivery, mode of delivery, dosage, materials and resources.
Appendix 2. Marked Up Questionnaire
- Total number of respondents = 90 Family Nurses.
- All responses completed online.
- Questions and responses are group under the following domain headings:
- Visiting Patterns/Contacts; Changes to Service Delivery Following COVID-19 Outbreak; Home Visiting During the COVID-19 Outbreak; Remote Programme Delivery and Perceptions of Telehealth; Therapeutic Relationship; Identification of Concerns; Referrals; Assessments and Observations using Telehealth; Training, Guidance and Support; Clinical Supervision; Communication with Colleagues; External Partnership Working; Additional Comments - FNP Service Delivery During COVID-19.
- Data collection period: 19 January 2021 – 10 March 2021.
Visiting Patterns/Contacts
Q1 - How often were you able to provide the expected number of visits/contacts, based on fidelity, to clients prior to the COVID-19 restrictions?
Item / Percentage
- Always 21%
- Most of the time 64%
- About half the time 9%
- Sometimes 4%
- Never 1%
Q2 - Since the COVID-19 restrictions have come into place, how often, if at all, are you able to provide the expected number of visits/contacts (i.e., virtual or face to face), based on fidelity, to clients now?
Item / Percentage
- Always 7%
- Most of the time 59%
- About half the time 20%
- Sometimes 9%
- Never 3%
- Same as before 2%
Q3 - How would you describe the overall level of FNP additional visits/contacts (i.e., more than fidelity) you were providing clients, prior to the COVID-19 restrictions?
Item / Percentage
- Far above average 3%
- Somewhat above average 25%
- Average 67%
- Somewhat below average 4%
- Far below average 0%
Q4 - Since the COVID-19 restrictions have come into place, how would you describe the overall level of additional visits/contacts (i.e., virtual or face to face) you are now providing, over and above 'normal' visiting patterns?
Item / Percentage
- Far above average 2%
- Somewhat above average 20%
- Average 52%
- Somewhat below average 15%
- Far below average 4%
- Same as before (pre-COVID-19) 7%
Changes to the Service Following the Covid-19 Outbreak
Q5 - To what extent, if at all, do you think the following factors have changed since the COVID-19 outbreak started?
Item | Decreased significantly | Decreased slightly | Stayed the same | Increased slightly | Increased significantly | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Client engagement with the FNP service | 9% | 46% | 32% | 13% | 0% |
2 | Client retention | 1% | 18% | 74% | 6% | 1% |
3 | Overall client vulnerability | 2% | 2% | 7% | 42% | 47% |
4 | Overall number of vulnerable clients | 0% | 0% | 20% | 47% | 33% |
5 | Clients' abilities to achieve personal goals and outcomes | 39% | 44% | 10% | 3% | 3% |
6 | Personal workload | 1% | 7% | 26% | 45% | 21% |
7 | Complexity of caseload | 0% | 2% | 23% | 45% | 30% |
8 | The overall effectiveness of local FNP service delivery in your Health Board | 7% | 34% | 44% | 11% | 3% |
9 | The overall efficiency of local FNP service delivery in your Health Board | 6% | 22% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
10 | Your team's ability to achieve intended programme outcomes | 16% | 40% | 39% | 3% | 2% |
Home Visiting During the Covid-19 Outbreak
Q6 - Have you continued to offer home visits during the COVID-19 outbreak?
Item / Percentage
- Yes 100%
- No 0%
Q7 - What proportion of your caseload have you offered home visits to during this time?
Item / Percentage
- 100% 29%
- 99-75% 15%
- 74-50% 20%
- 49-25% 22%
- 25-1% 13%
- None 0%
Q8 - When a home visit was offered to a client, how often was this offer taken up by the client?
Item / Percentage
- Always 41%
- Most of the time 51%
- About half the time 5%
- Sometimes 3%
- Never 0%
Q9 - Please state the main reasons given by clients who have declined the offer of a home visit during COVID-19, if any?
Summary of Most Common Text Responses
- Concerns about transmitting or contracting COVID-19
- Self-isolating clients/family members
- Vulnerable and shielding clients/family members
- Other family members declining visitors due to concerns about COVID-19
- No declines or very small proportion of declines overall
Remote Programme Delivery And Perceptions Of Telehealth
Q10 - Do you have previous experience of using the following telehealth technologies with FNP clients prior to the COVID-19 outbreak?
Item | Yes | No | Don't know | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Telephone calls | 92% | 8% | 0% |
2 | 31% | 69% | 0% | |
3 | Mobile apps | 17% | 81% | 2% |
4 | Attend Anywhere | 9% | 91% | 0% |
5 | Near Me | 7% | 92% | 1% |
6 | Video Call (other) | 11% | 89% | 0% |
7 | Other (please specify) | 8% | 86% | 5% |
Q11 - Since the COVID-19 restrictions have been introduced, how frequently do you use the following modes to deliver the FNP service?
Item | Always | Most of the time | About half the time | Sometimes | Never | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Telephone calls | 5% | 23% | 33% | 38% | 1% |
2 | 3% | 8% | 3% | 31% | 56% | |
3 | Mobile apps | 0% | 0% | 3% | 18% | 79% |
4 | Attend Anywhere | 1% | 12% | 22% | 24% | 40% |
5 | Near Me | 1% | 18% | 24% | 36% | 21% |
6 | Video Call (other) | 0% | 9% | 8% | 18% | 65% |
7 | Text messaging | 21% | 23% | 11% | 27% | 17% |
8 | Home visits | 1% | 19% | 34% | 45% | 1% |
9 | Other (please specify) | 0% | 8% | 12% | 15% | 65% |
Q12 - To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
Item | Strongly agree | Somewhat agree | Neither agree nor disagree | Somewhat disagree | Strongly disagree | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | I feel comfortable delivering the FNP service using Telehealth | 17% | 48% | 14% | 15% | 6% |
2 | I am familiar with the technologies required to deliver FNP remotely | 46% | 48% | 5% | 1% | 0% |
3 | I would like to continue using Telehealth to deliver FNP in the future | 11% | 46% | 13% | 15% | 14% |
4 | I have access to adequate training and resources for using Telehealth within FNP | 26% | 45% | 14% | 14% | 0% |
5 | I have access to the necessary tools and equipment for remote service delivery of FNP | 39% | 40% | 8% | 10% | 2% |
Q13 - How would you rate the quality of your overall clinical observations when using remote delivery, compared with face-to-face visits?
Item / Percentage
- Much better 0%
- Somewhat better 1%
- About the same 6%
- Somewhat worse 76%
- Much worse 17%
Q14 - Please select from the following to indicate your preference for future delivery of the FNP service [Most (1) - Least (4) preferred]:
Item | Most Preferred Option (1) | (2) | (3) | Least Preferred Option (4) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | In-person home visiting only | 55% | 35% | 5% | 5% |
2 | Telehealth delivery only | 4% | 4% | 14% | 77% |
3 | Mixed-mode (face-to-face and Telehealth delivery) | 42% | 25% | 26% | 7% |
4 | Other (please specify) | 8% | 23% | 15% | 54% |
Q15a - In your opinion, do you think FNP could be delivered effectively to clients using a multi-faceted approach, such as face to face and telephone without compromising the essence or outcomes of the programme?
Item / Percentage
- Yes (please explain why) 68%
- No (please explain why) 32%
Q15b_TEXT - Yes (please explain why) and Q15c_TEXT – No (please explain why). Summary of most common text responses:
Responses for 'Yes (please explain why)' | Responses for 'No (please explain why)' | |
---|---|---|
1 | Provides convenient options to maintain engagement with clients who have other commitments (e.g., work or education). | Many clients uncomfortable or have difficulties engaging via telehealth |
2 | Most clients have adapted and engaged well with telehealth delivery. | Therapeutic relationship is harder to establish |
3 | Mixed-mode delivery is effective but option for remote delivery should be dependent on client level of vulnerability. | Communication during face-to-face interaction is much more valuable. Easier to explore feelings, body language and subtle signs that may indicate a larger issue. |
4 | Mixed-mode delivery helps to save time and costs associated with work-related travel and missed appointments. Allows better time management for FNs. | Assessments and clinical observations are more challenging |
5 | Improved access for clients living in rural areas | Difficulties conducting DANCE and PIPE activities as well as IPV and other assessments via telehealth |
Q16 - To what extent do you agree with the following statements? The use of Telehealth (e.g. Attend Anywhere/Near Me or telephone calls etc.) in delivering the FNP service will lead to:
Item | Strongly agree | Somewhat agree | Neither agree nor disagree | Somewhat disagree | Strongly disagree | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Increased communication and connection with clients | 5% | 38% | 24% | 25% | 8% |
2 | Lower workloads for FNP nurses | 10% | 29% | 19% | 24% | 19% |
3 | Greater client self-efficacy | 4% | 31% | 35% | 23% | 8% |
4 | Clients having more time to achieve personal goals and programme outcomes | 1% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 10% |
5 | Higher client retention | 1% | 26% | 35% | 24% | 14% |
6 | Improved long-term outcomes for clients and children | 2% | 11% | 37% | 29% | 21% |
7 | A client preference for Telehealth communication in place of home visiting | 5% | 12% | 29% | 29% | 25% |
8 | Exclusion of clients due to a lack of technological access | 34% | 36% | 13% | 13% | 4% |
9 | Improvements in the quality of assessment carried out by FNP nurses | 0% | 4% | 20% | 30% | 46% |
Therapeutic Relationship with Clients
Q17 - Overall, has your relationship with clients got better, worse or stayed the same since the COVID-19 outbreak started?
Item / Percentage
- Much better 0%
- Somewhat better 13%
- About the same 64%
- Somewhat worse 21%
- Much worse 1%
Identification Of Concerns
Q18 - Do you feel that clients are contacting you more or less frequently with any issues and concerns following the COVID-19 outbreak?
Item / Percentage
- Much more frequently 12%
- Somewhat more frequently 33%
- About the same as before 45%
- Somewhat less frequently 10%
- Much less frequently 0%
Total 84
Q19 - Since the COVID-19 restrictions began, do you feel that you are able to identify needs and/or any issues that your clients might have, compared with previous ways of working (pre COVID-19)?
Item / Percentage
- Definitely yes 2%
- Probably yes 27%
- Might or might not 36%
- Probably not 31%
- Definitely not 4%
Total 84
Referrals
Q20a - Overall, have you been able to submit referrals successfully during the COVID-19 outbreak?
Item / Percentage
- Yes 57%
- No (Please specify, why not and what agencies?) 43%
Total 84
Q20b_TEXT - No (Please specify, why not and what agencies?). Summary of most common text responses:
- Many services had limited operation due to COVID-19 or were not operating at all in some areas.
- Difficulties accessing services due to confusion around which ones were still operating, mixed communication with other agencies.
- Services were not accepting referrals or were unresponsive to requests.
- Challenges obtaining mental health support.
- Services not providing face-to-face support which could lead to client non-engagement or inadequate level of support.
Total count of agencies referred to for Q20b_TEXT - No responses:
Local Authority
Agency Count
- Nursery 1
- Social Work 1
- Housing 5
- Money advice 2
Healthcare
Agency Count
- Childsmile 1
- Mental health 9
- Learning disability 1
- Speech and Language 1
- Contraceptive and sexual health services 4
- GP 2
- Postnatal checks 2
- Paediatricians 1
Parent/child groups
Agency Count
- Groups for mums 2
- Childcare 2
- Playgroups 1
Third Sector
Agency Count
- Charity organisation's 9
Other
Agency Count
- Work experience/employment 2
Total Count = 46
Assessments And Observations Using Telehealth
Q21 - How would you rate the following aspects of delivering FNP when using Telehealth in comparison with face-to-face visits?
Item | Much better | Somewhat better | About the same | Somewhat worse | Much worse | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | To what extent do you feel able to make observations of the child using Telehealth when compared with face-to-face visits? | 0% | 0% | 6% | 65% | 29% |
2 | To what extent do you feel that you are able to carry out child assessments effectively using Telehealth when compared with face-to-face visits? | 0% | 0% | 14% | 63% | 23% |
3 | How would you rate your overall ability to assess clients' home environments using Telehealth when compared with face-to-face visits? | 0% | 0% | 2% | 52% | 46% |
Training, Guidance And Support
Q22a - Have you been provided with any guidance to support your working following the COVID-19 outbreak?
Item / Percentage
- Yes (please provide details) 90%
- No 4%
- Unsure 6%
Q22b_TEXT - Yes (please provide details). Summary of most common text responses:
Category / Responses
- COVID-19 Risk Mitigation and Health & Safety Guidance Conducting essential visits, PPE, COVID-19 risk assessment guidance
- Clinical Training Scottish Government clinical guidance IPV training (telehealth-specific),
- FNP-specific National FNP guidance; supervisory support for home visiting in accordance with guidelines,
- IT Training Near Me and Attend Anywhere guidance,
- Other Self-care resources and guidance, local Health Board guidance
Q23a - Have you been offered any training opportunities to support your working following the COVID-19 outbreak?
Item / Percentage
- Yes (please provide details) 68%
- No 23%
- Unsure 10%
Q23b_TEXT - Yes (please provide details). Most common text responses:
Category / Responses
- IT Training Training to use telehealth software/hardware, mainly NHS Near Me/Attend Anywhere, and Microsoft Teams
- FNP-specific How to deliver PIPE, DANCE and FNP facilitators via telehealth
- Clinical Child protection, IPV training, breastfeeding,
Clinical Supervision
Q24 - Please rate the following factors in terms of receiving/providing supervision via Telehealth:
Item | Extremely good | Somewhat good | Neither good nor bad | Somewhat bad | Extremely bad | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Overall experience | 31% | 45% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 83 |
2 | Relationship with supervisor | 53% | 28% | 17% | 2% | 0% | 83 |
3 | Quality of supervision | 54% | 31% | 12% | 2% | 0% | 83 |
4 | Level of support | 52% | 35% | 9% | 2% | 1% | 82 |
Q25a - Do you think this model of supervision could continue successfully in the future?
Item / Percentage
- Yes 70%
- No (if not, why not?) 30%
Q25b_TEXT - No (if not, why not?)
Summary of Most Common Text Responses
- Less connection with colleagues: Family nurses do not feel well connected to colleagues during remote supervision and meetings.
- Privacy concerns whilst home working or in shared office space. Distractions whilst working from home disrupts meetings also.
- Internet connectivity issues disrupt the flow of conversations.
- Quality of supervision is affected. Communication is richer in person. Better able to identify non-verbal ques and body language, conversation flow is more natural and personable.
- A mixture of face-to-face and remote supervision would be acceptable.
Q26 - Has supervision of FNP nurses during the COVID-19 outbreak continued as per the core model?
Item / Percentage
- Yes 95%
- No 5%
Q27 - Please add in any comments you wish to make about your experience of receiving/providing supervision via Telehealth during COVID-19:
Summary of Most Common Text Responses
- Supervision via telehealth has worked well overall and comparable to face-to-face meeting. Family nurses feel well supported. Microsoft Teams works well.
- Remote delivery saves travel time and grants flexibility in regard to location
- Preferences expressed for face-to-face supervision instead of telehealth as level of connection is not the same. Some felt relationships had been impacted by ongoing online communication.
- Less distractions during online supervision, meetings are more focussed
- Impacted negatively by connectivity and technology problems
Communication With Colleagues
Q28 - How has the quality of communication with fellow staff members and colleagues been following the COVID-19 outbreak, compared to before?
Item / Percentage
- Much better 0%
- Somewhat better 2%
- About the same 26%
- Somewhat worse 50%
- Much worse 21%
External Partnership Working
Q29 - How has the quality of communication with external partner agencies been following the COVID-19 outbreak, compared to before?
Item / Percentage
- Much better 0%
- Somewhat better 9%
- About the same 29%
- Somewhat worse 51%
- Much worse 11%
Contact
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback