Materials for the Scottish Government's public Ayr Cabinet Meeting: FOI release

Information request and response under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002.


Information requested

Full minutes/briefings written for the Scottish Government's public Ayr Cabinet Meeting on November 4.

Response

As you have referred to the "public Ayr Cabinet meeting" I have interpreted your request to relate to the public discussion held with members of the public in Ayr Town Hall on 4 November rather than the Cabinet meeting held in private earlier that day in the same venue.

In line with standard practice for these public Cabinet events, minutes were not taken of the public discussion in Ayr because the whole event is recorded and live streamed and the broadcast is available on the Scottish Government's YouTube channel at: Travelling Cabinet, Ayr - Public Discussion.

You also asked for briefings written for this public discussion. These are enclosed at Annex A.

While our aim is to provide information whenever possible, in this instance we are unable to provide some of the information you have requested because exemptions under s.29(1)(a) (policy formulation), s.30(b)(i) (substantial inhibition to free and frank provision of advice) and s.38(1)(b) (personal information) of FOISA applies to that information. All of the briefings provided to Ministers for the public discussion in Ayr on 4 November are supplied at Annex A but some information within them which is exempt under the above exemptions has been redacted. The reasons why these exemptions apply are explained below.

An exemption under section 29(1)(a) of FOISA (formulation or development of government policy) applies to some of the information requested because it relates to the formulation of Scottish Government policy. This exemption is subject to the ‘public interest test’. Therefore, taking account of all the circumstances of this case, we have considered if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption. We have found that, on balance, the public interest lies in favour of upholding the exemption. We recognise that there is a public interest in disclosing information as part of open, transparent and accountable government, and to inform public debate. However, there is a greater public interest in high quality policy and decision-making, and in the properly considered implementation and development of policies and decisions. This means that Ministers and officials need to be able to consider all available options and to debate those rigorously, to fully understand their possible implications. Their candour in doing so will be affected by their assessment of whether the discussions on policy will be disclosed in the near future, when it may undermine or constrain the Government’s view on that policy while it is still under discussion and development.

An exemption under section 30(b)(i) of FOISA (free and frank provision of advice) applies to some of the information requested. This exemption recognises the need for Ministers to have a private space within which to seek advice and views from officials before reaching the settled public position. Disclosing the content of free and frank briefing material provided to Ministers for Cabinet events will substantially inhibit such briefing in the future. This exemption is subject to the ‘public interest test’.

Therefore, taking account of all the circumstances of this case, we have considered if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption. We have found that, on balance, the public interest lies in favour of upholding the exemption. We recognise that there is a public interest in disclosing information as part of open, transparent and accountable government, and to inform public debate. However, there is a greater public interest in allowing a private space within which officials can provide full and frank advice to Ministers as part of the process of exploring and refining the Government’s policy, until the Government as a whole can adopt a policy decision that is sound and likely to be effective. This private thinking space is essential to enable all options to be properly considered, based on the best available advice, so that good policy decisions can be taken. Premature disclosure is likely to undermine the full and frank discussion of issues between Ministers and officials, which in turn will undermine the quality of the policy decision making process, which would not be in the public interest.

An exemption under section 38(1)(b) of FOISA (personal information) applies to some of the information requested because it is personal data of a third party, i.e. names and contact details of individuals, and disclosing it would contravene the data protection principles in Article 5(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation and in section 34(1) of the Data Protection Act 2018. This includes the names and contact details of civil servants below the grade of Senior Civil Servant. This exemption is not subject to the ‘public interest test’, so we are not required to consider if the public interest in disclosing the information outweighs the public interest in applying the exemption.

About FOI

The Scottish Government is committed to publishing all information released in response to Freedom of Information requests. View all FOI responses at https://www.gov.scot/foi-responses.

FOI 202400442735 - Information Released - Annex

Contact

Please quote the FOI reference
Central Correspondence Unit
Email: contactus@gov.scot
Phone: 0300 244 4000

The Scottish Government
St Andrew's House
Regent Road
Edinburgh
EH1 3DG

Back to top