Heat Networks Delivery Models
This report, prepared by Scottish Futures Trust (SFT) for the Scottish Government, assesses the potential roles that a range of delivery models (alongside a number of complementary enabling structures / mechanisms) could play in helping to accelerate the pace and scale of heat network deployment.
Appendix B: Evaluation scores
Attribute | Model Name & Attribute Scores | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DM1 (Public sector ownership) | DM2 (Service concession) | DM3 (Third party ESCo) | DM4 (LA JVs) | DM5 (Comm. Co) | DM6 (Unbundled) | DM7 (Merchant) | DM8 (Centrally led) | DM9 (LA led, SG stake) | DM10 (RESCo) | DM11 (PPP) | DM12 (RAB) | |
Ease of Deployment | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Potential for Private Investment | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Simplifies Delivery | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
Contributes to Policy Objectives | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Skills & Capacity | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Demand Risk | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Transition to self-sustaining market | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Replicability | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Supports Expansion/ Interconnection | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Installation ahead of demand | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
TOTAL SCORE | 11 | 15 | 9 | 19 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 22 | 6 | 17 |
Ranking of Model | 7 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 4 |
Evaluation Score | Score description |
---|---|
0 | Potentially negative impact in relation to this attribute; fails to meet attribute at all. |
1 | Is neutral in relation to this attribute; neither benefit nor negative impact |
2 | Performs well against this attribute |
3 | Performs very well against this attribute. |
Contact
Email: heatnetworksupport@gov.scot
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback