Local Development Plan evidence report – defining Gypsies and Travellers: consultation analysis

7. Conclusions

While many respondents welcomed the idea of a definition to enable councils to more effectively seek the views of Gypsy and Traveller communities, there were mixed responses to the proposed definition that was initially set out by the Scottish Government.

The need to recognise Gypsies and Travellers in their multiple communities with distinct and different cultures, histories and planning needs was a consistent theme throughout the consultation questions. In particular, the recognition of ethnic minority Gypsy/Travellers and their protected characteristics was of great importance to respondents, both from the online survey and the in-person engagement sessions.

Respondents highlighted that Travelling Showpeople are to be regarded as a separate community with their own distinct planning needs, both within the definition and in councils' consultation processes.

While respondents welcomed the idea of a definition that is inclusive and broad to capture the many Travelling communities and include Travellers whether they are currently travelling or not, there were concerns that a definition that is too vague can consequently capture non-Travelling communities or create confusion and further misunderstanding to the identities of these multiple groups. This was perceived by online respondents and session participants.

Respondents broadly agreed that the way councils should involve Gypsy and Traveller communities in their planning processes should incorporate multiple engagement techniques, face-to-face consultations, and be accessible to all groups and individuals in the Gypsy and Traveller communities within that area.

Most respondents believe that this (or any) definition would not have an impact on businesses. Most respondents believe that this (or any) definition would have an impact on certain groups of protected characteristics.

Of those who do believe a definition would impact businesses and groups of protected characteristics, most believe the nature of the impact is dependent on the final definition, or they are unsure of the nature of the impact.