Assessing the costs of meeting Scotland's zero waste targets: report
Report examining the costs to local authorities of meeting the European Commission's Landfill Directive and Scottish Government Zero Waste targets.
Annex B: Scenarios and Results
Scenarios
Table B-1 Waste Forecast Scenarios
Scenario Number |
Description |
---|---|
Scenario 1a. Do Nothing (With Landfill Fines) |
Continue at 2008/2009 levels of municipal waste processing and at present cost levels. No change in waste streams. The appropriate landfill fines are imposed. |
Scenario 1b. Do Nothing (No Landfill Fines) |
Continue at 2008/2009 levels of municipal waste processing and at present cost levels. No change in waste streams. No landfill fines are imposed. |
Scenario 2. EUWFD Only |
Meet all EU statutory obligations (only) such as the Waste Framework Directive and the Landfill Directive (e.g. landfill targets for 2010, 2013 and 2020; and 50% recycling/composting by 2020), but not the Scottish Government targets. |
Scenario 3. EUWFD & SG Targets (50/20) |
Meet all EU statutory obligations and all Scottish Government targets. This scenario assumes a 50/20 split between source segregation and residual waste to meet the 70% recycling and composting target. |
Scenario 4. EUWFD & SG targets (60/10) |
Meet all EU statutory obligations and all Scottish Government targets as per scenario 3 except this scenario assumes a 60/10 split between source segregation and residual waste to meet the 70% recycling and composting target. |
Scenario 5. EUWFD & SG Targets (65/5) |
Meet all EU statutory obligations and all Scottish Government targets as per scenario 3 except this scenario assumes a 65/5 split between source segregation and residual waste to meet the 70% recycling and composting target. |
Scenario 6. EfW cap by 2018 |
Meet all EU statutory obligations and all Scottish Government targets as in scenario 3 except that EfW reaches its 25% cap earlier in 2018. |
Source: SQW Energy
Cost Benefit Analysis Results (2010 to 2025) - NPV
Table B-2 - Cost Benefit Analysis (2010 to 2025) - All Figures NPV
Scenario |
Collectn |
Processing |
Landfill Fines |
Infrastr. Investment |
Benefits |
NPC above current spend |
Benefits |
NPC above current spend |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1a. Do Nothing (with Fines) |
£2,480 |
£4,115 |
£1,288 |
£91 |
£559 |
2,346 |
907 |
1,997 |
1a. Do Nothing (No Fines) |
£2,480 |
£4,115 |
0 |
£91 |
£559 |
1,058 |
907 |
709 |
2. EU Only |
£3,347 |
£3,431 |
0 |
£434 |
£697 |
1,445 |
1,104 |
1,038 |
3. EU & SG Targets (50/20) |
£3,763 |
£3,006 |
0 |
£449 |
£682 |
1,467 |
998 |
1,152 |
4. EU & SG Targets (60/10) |
£3,724 |
£2,888 |
0 |
£342 |
£682 |
1,203 |
998 |
887 |
5. EU & SG Targets (65/5) |
£3,695 |
£2,799 |
0 |
£303 |
£682 |
1,046 |
998 |
730 |
6. EfW Cap by 2018 |
£3,811 |
£2,981 |
0 |
£646 |
£741 |
1,628 |
1,122 |
1,247 |
Source: SQW Energy
Adding ROCs has the effect of reducing the NPC for all the scenarios. The order of the scenarios remains the same, except for Scenario 1b which now becomes the most competitive, being slightly more cost competitive than Scenario 5.
Scenario 1a and 1b - Infrastructure Requirement Table
Table B-3 Additional waste infrastructure required in Scotland (Scenario 1a and 1b)
Waste infrastructure required |
No. of units |
Operational capacity per unit* |
Total Capacity* |
---|---|---|---|
aerobic (1,000t) |
2 |
1,000 |
2,000 |
aerobic (10,000t) |
0 |
10,000 |
0 |
aerobic (25,000t) |
5 |
25,000 |
125,000 |
aerobic (50,000t) |
0 |
50,000 |
0 |
anaerobic (1,000t) |
3 |
1,000 |
3,000 |
anaerobic (5,000t) |
8 |
5,000 |
40,000 |
anaerobic (30,000t) |
2 |
30,000 |
60,000 |
anaerobic (50,000t) |
1 |
50,000 |
50,000 |
EfW (8,000t) |
1 |
8,000 |
8,000 |
EfW (64,000t) |
0 |
64,000 |
0 |
EfW (200,000t) |
0 |
200,000 |
0 |
MBT (8,000t) |
0 |
8,000 |
0 |
MBT (40,000t) |
2 |
40,000 |
80,000 |
MBT (80,000t) |
2 |
80,000 |
160,000 |
* Energy from Waste and MBT plants are assumed to operate at 80% of total stated capacity to reflect downtime for maintenance and repairs.
Source: SQW Energy
Scenario 1a and 1b - Infrastructure Requirement Chart
Figure B-1 Infrastructure Capacity Requirement (Scenario 1a and 1b)
Source: SQW Energy
Scenario 2 - Infrastructure Requirement Table
Table B-4 Additional waste infrastructure required in Scotland (Scenario 2)
Waste infrastructure required |
No. of units |
Operational capacity per unit* |
Total Capacity* |
---|---|---|---|
aerobic (1,000t) |
0 |
1,000 |
0 |
aerobic (10,000t) |
4 |
10,000 |
40,000 |
aerobic (25,000t) |
2 |
25,000 |
50,000 |
aerobic (50,000t) |
0 |
50,000 |
0 |
anaerobic (1,000t) |
3 |
1,000 |
3,000 |
anaerobic (5,000t) |
12 |
5,000 |
60,000 |
anaerobic (30,000t) |
2 |
30,000 |
60,000 |
anaerobic (50,000t) |
1 |
50,000 |
50,000 |
EfW (8,000t) |
5 |
8,000 |
40,000 |
EfW (64,000t) |
4 |
64,000 |
256,000 |
EfW (200,000t) |
0 |
200,000 |
0 |
MBT (8,000t) |
4 |
8,000 |
32,000 |
MBT (40,000t) |
3 |
40,000 |
120,000 |
MBT (80,000t) |
7 |
80,000 |
560,000 |
* Energy from Waste and MBT plants are assumed to operate at 80% of total stated capacity to reflect downtime for maintenance and repairs.
Source: SQW Energy
Scenario 2 - Infrastructure Requirement Chart
Figure B-2 Infrastructure Capacity Requirement (Scenario 2)
Source: SQW Energy
Scenario 3 - Infrastructure Requirement Table
Table B-5 Additional waste infrastructure required in Scotland (Scenario 3)
Waste infrastructure required |
No. of units |
Operational capacity per unit* |
Total Capacity* |
---|---|---|---|
aerobic (1,000t) |
0 |
1,000 |
0 |
aerobic (10,000t) |
2 |
10,000 |
20,000 |
aerobic (25,000t) |
2 |
25,000 |
50,000 |
aerobic (50,000t) |
3 |
50,000 |
150,000 |
anaerobic (1,000t) |
4 |
1,000 |
4,000 |
anaerobic (5,000t) |
5 |
5,000 |
25,000 |
anaerobic (30,000t) |
5 |
30,000 |
150,000 |
anaerobic (50,000t) |
2 |
50,000 |
100,000 |
EfW (8,000t) |
4 |
8,000 |
32,000 |
EfW (64,000t) |
6 |
64,000 |
384,000 |
EfW (200,000t) |
0 |
200,000 |
0 |
MBT (8,000t) |
4 |
8,000 |
32,000 |
MBT (40,000t) |
4 |
40,000 |
160,000 |
MBT (80,000t) |
9 |
80,000 |
720,000 |
* Energy from Waste and MBT plants are assumed to operate at 80% of total stated capacity to reflect downtime for maintenance and repairs.
Source: SQW Energy
Scenario 3 - Infrastructure Requirement Chart
Figure B-3 Infrastructure Capacity Requirement (Scenario 3)
Source: SQW Energy
Scenario 4 - Infrastructure Requirement Table
Table B-6 Additional waste infrastructure required in Scotland (Scenario 4)
Waste infrastructure required |
No. of units |
Operational capacity per unit* |
Total Capacity* |
---|---|---|---|
aerobic (1,000t) |
0 |
1,000 |
0 |
aerobic (10,000t) |
2 |
10,000 |
20,000 |
aerobic (25,000t) |
2 |
25,000 |
50,000 |
aerobic (50,000t) |
3 |
50,000 |
150,000 |
anaerobic (1,000t) |
4 |
1,000 |
4,000 |
anaerobic (5,000t) |
5 |
5,000 |
25,000 |
anaerobic (30,000t) |
5 |
30,000 |
150,000 |
anaerobic (50,000t) |
2 |
50,000 |
100,000 |
EfW (8,000t) |
4 |
8,000 |
32,000 |
EfW (64,000t) |
4 |
64,000 |
256,000 |
EfW (200,000t) |
0 |
200,000 |
0 |
MBT (8,000t) |
1 |
8,000 |
8,000 |
MBT (40,000t) |
3 |
40,000 |
120,000 |
MBT (80,000t) |
12 |
80,000 |
960,000 |
* Energy from Waste and MBT plants are assumed to operate at 80% of total stated capacity to reflect downtime for maintenance and repairs.
Source: SQW Energy
Scenario 4 - Infrastructure Requirement Chart
Figure B-4 Infrastructure Capacity Requirement (Scenario 4)
Source: SQW Energy
Scenario 5 - Infrastructure Requirement Table
Table B-7 Additional waste infrastructure required in Scotland (Scenario 5)
Waste infrastructure required |
No. of units |
Operational capacity per unit* |
Total Capacity* |
---|---|---|---|
aerobic (1,000t) |
0 |
1,000 |
0 |
aerobic (10,000t) |
2 |
10,000 |
20,000 |
aerobic (25,000t) |
2 |
25,000 |
50,000 |
aerobic (50,000t) |
3 |
50,000 |
150,000 |
anaerobic (1,000t) |
4 |
1,000 |
4,000 |
anaerobic (5,000t) |
5 |
5,000 |
25,000 |
anaerobic (30,000t) |
5 |
30,000 |
150,000 |
anaerobic (50,000t) |
2 |
50,000 |
100,000 |
EfW (8,000t) |
4 |
8,000 |
32,000 |
EfW (64,000t) |
4 |
64,000 |
256,000 |
EfW (200,000t) |
0 |
200,000 |
0 |
MBT (8,000t) |
1 |
8,000 |
8,000 |
MBT (40,000t) |
3 |
40,000 |
120,000 |
MBT (80,000t) |
12 |
80,000 |
960,000 |
* Energy from Waste and MBT plants are assumed to operate at 80% of total stated capacity to reflect downtime for maintenance and repairs.
Source: SQW Energy
Scenario 5 - Infrastructure Requirement Chart
Figure B-5 Infrastructure Capacity Requirement (Scenario 5)
Source: SQW Energy
Scenario 6 - Infrastructure Requirement Table
Table B-8 Additional waste infrastructure required in Scotland (Scenario 6)
Waste infrastructure required |
No. of units |
Operational capacity per unit* |
Total Capacity* |
---|---|---|---|
aerobic (1,000t) |
0 |
1,000 |
0 |
aerobic (10,000t) |
2 |
10,000 |
20,000 |
aerobic (25,000t) |
2 |
25,000 |
50,000 |
aerobic (50,000t) |
3 |
50,000 |
150,000 |
anaerobic (1,000t) |
4 |
1,000 |
4,000 |
anaerobic (5,000t) |
5 |
5,000 |
25,000 |
anaerobic (30,000t) |
5 |
30,000 |
150,000 |
anaerobic (50,000t) |
2 |
50,000 |
100,000 |
EfW (8,000t) |
6 |
8,000 |
48,000 |
EfW (64,000t) |
8 |
64,000 |
512,000 |
EfW (200,000t) |
0 |
200,000 |
0 |
MBT (8,000t) |
8 |
8,000 |
64,000 |
MBT (40,000t) |
5 |
40,000 |
200,000 |
MBT (80,000t) |
10 |
80,000 |
800,000 |
* Energy from Waste and MBT plants are assumed to operate at 80% of total stated capacity to reflect downtime for maintenance and repairs.
Source: SQW Energy
Scenario 6 - Infrastructure Requirement Chart
Figure B-6 Infrastructure Capacity Requirement (Scenario 6)
Source: SQW Energy
Annual Nominal Additional Cost
Table B-9 - Annual Additional Costs in Excess of Existing Expenditure (Nominal)
Scenario |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
2021 |
2022 |
2023 |
2024 |
2025 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1a |
40 |
69 |
115 |
205 |
242 |
253 |
262 |
278 |
287 |
295 |
311 |
311 |
311 |
311 |
311 |
311 |
1b |
40 |
69 |
83 |
138 |
140 |
143 |
143 |
149 |
149 |
149 |
156 |
156 |
156 |
156 |
156 |
156 |
2 |
41 |
62 |
89 |
137 |
175 |
187 |
187 |
215 |
216 |
217 |
225 |
225 |
225 |
225 |
225 |
225 |
3 |
41 |
63 |
92 |
136 |
172 |
189 |
189 |
208 |
210 |
211 |
218 |
224 |
229 |
235 |
237 |
240 |
4 |
41 |
62 |
87 |
120 |
149 |
149 |
149 |
148 |
147 |
146 |
213 |
219 |
224 |
232 |
234 |
237 |
5 |
41 |
62 |
87 |
120 |
149 |
149 |
149 |
148 |
147 |
146 |
144 |
143 |
140 |
231 |
234 |
237 |
6 |
39 |
62 |
91 |
138 |
178 |
193 |
195 |
221 |
244 |
245 |
252 |
264 |
264 |
265 |
282 |
283 |
Source: SQW Energy
Annual Nominal Additional Cost
Figure B-7 - Annual Additional Costs in Excess of Existing Expenditure (Nominal)
Source: SQW Energy
Contact
Email: Central Enquiries Unit ceu@gov.scotEmail: Central Enquiries Unit ceu@gov.scot
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback