National Trauma Transformation Programme: workforce survey 2024

This report presents the main findings from a survey carried out with the workforce in Scotland exploring awareness and attitudes to psychological trauma and trauma-informed practice. The survey was carried out by the Improvement Service as part of the National Trauma Transformation Programme.


4. Trauma-informed drivers within organisations

Overall agreement

In addition to rating their own confidence and understanding, respondents were also asked to rate how they felt key drivers of trauma-informed practice were embedded within their own organisation or service’s culture. Respondents were asked to state to what extent they agreed with each of the eight statements outlined below.

Trauma-Informed Organisations and Services Statements

1. All staff have the knowledge, skills, confidence, and capacity to recognise and respond to people affected by trauma, through training and implementation support relevant to their job role and service remit.

2. Leaders at all levels understand, drive, and inspire working in a trauma-informed and responsive way.

3. Our organisation’s budget includes a long-term commitment to embedding a trauma-informed and responsive approach.

4. Our policies and processes reflect and understanding of the prevalence and impact of trauma.

5. Staff wellbeing is valued and prioritised.

6. We continually use feedback to improve how we design and deliver our services.

7. We routinely create safe and meaningful opportunities to share power with people with lived experience of trauma.

8. Whatever our organisation’s remit, our services are designed and delivered to resist re-traumatisation, recognise people’s resilience, and support people’s recovery.

These statements were selected to reflect those included in “A Roadmap for Creating Trauma-Informed and Responsive Change”, which was launched in 2023. As such, not all of the statements included in this survey were also included in that issued in 2021.

Respondent comments: “Organisations (including public service) continually talk about the need for trauma-informed practice. The conversation has gone on long enough. Instead of continually talking about it, they need to just get on with it and 'be trauma informed'!”

There were varying levels of agreement across the statements. Respondents had the highest ratings of agreement with the statement “Staff wellbeing is valued and prioritised”, with 58 percent stating they agreed or strongly agreed. In contrast, the statement “Our organisation’s budget includes a long-term commitment to embedding a trauma-informed and responsive approach” had much lower agreement with just 22 percent of respondents saying they agreed or strongly agreed compared with 25 percent who disagreed or strongly disagreed. This statement also had a large proportion who responded with “don’t know” suggesting this might be an area where a large proportion of the workforce are not aware of their organisation’s practices.

The statement with the highest level of disagreement was “All staff have the knowledge, skills, confidence and capacity to recognise and respond to people affected by trauma, through training and implementation support relevant to their job role and service remit”. Forty percent of respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed with this statement.

A full breakdown of responses per statement is shown in Figure 12 and Figure 13.

Figure 12 - Responses to statements about trauma-informed organisations 2024
The image shows 4 bar charts for the organisational statements Staff have knowledge, skills, confidence & capacity, Staff wellbeing prioritised, Feedback used, Opportunities to share power with lived experience, with the proportion of responses for each statement. For each statement Agree responses had the largest proportion except for the statement Staff have knowledge, skills confidence & capacity where Disagree responses were largest.
Figure 13 - Responses to statements about trauma-informed organisations 2024
The image shows 4 bar charts for the organisational statements, Leaders drive and inspire, Staff wellbeing prioritised, Feedback used and Opportunities to share power with lived experience, with the proportion of responses for each statement. For the statement Policies & processes reflective and Services designed to resist re-traumatisation, support recovery Agree responses were the largest at 35% and 31% respectively. For the statements Leaders drive and inspire and Budget includes long-term commitment Neither agree nor disagree responses were largest at 29% and 32% respectively.

There were four statements comparable to those in the previous survey. Changes in responses to these statements since the previous survey are outlined below.

  • There has been a slight reduction in the proportion of respondents who agreed that leaders at all levels understand, drive, and inspire working in a trauma-informed and responsive way. The proportion who agreed or strongly agreed reduced from 37 percent in 2021 to 36 percent in 2024, but this change was not statistically significant.
  • Levels of agreement were also lower for the statement “Staff wellbeing is valued and prioritised”. Again, this was not a statistically significant change, reducing from 64 percent agreement in 2021 to 58 percent in 2024. Despite this reduction, this statement had the highest proportion of respondents who said they agreed across the eight statements in the current survey.
  • There was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of respondents who agreed or strongly agreed with the statement “We continually use feedback to improve how we design and deliver our services”. This increased from 23 percent in 2021 to 48 percent in 2024.
  • Respondents were also more likely to agree with the statement, “We routinely create safe and meaningful opportunities to share power with people with lived experience of trauma” in the current survey. The proportion who agreed or strongly agreed increased from 28 percent in 2021 to 40 percent in 2024, a statistically significant change.

Figure 14 shows changes over time in responses to the four comparable statements.

Figure 14 - Responses to statements about trauma-informed organisations in 2021 and 2024
The image shows 4 bar charts for the 4 organisational statements, Leaders drive and inspire, Staff wellbeing prioritised, Feedback used and Opportunities to share power with lived experience, with the proportion of responses for each statement in 2021 and 2024. For each statement except Staff wellbeing prioritised Strongly Agree and Agree responses increased or stayed the same between 2021 and 2024.

These figures may suggest that there have been improvements in external facing organisational practices linked with service users and clients, whilst internal practices related to leadership and staff wellbeing have shown little change.

While the decrease in the proportion of respondents who said they agreed with the statements “Leaders at all levels understand, drive, and inspire working in a trauma-informed and responsive way” and “Staff wellbeing is valued and prioritised” were not statistically significant, there was a statistically significant increase in the number of respondents who disagreed with these. The proportion of respondents who disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement “Leaders at all levels understand, drive and inspire working in a trauma-informed and responsive way” increased from 24 percent in 2021 to 30 percent in 2024. For the statement, “Staff wellbeing is valued and prioritised” rates of disagreement increased from 16 percent in 2021 to 22 percent in 2024.

Responses by sector, service area and job role

Sector

Respondents from the third/voluntary sector generally had higher levels of agreement with the statements. Comparably, public sector respondents had lower levels of agreement.

One of the most notable differences between groups was responses to the statement “Whatever our organisation’s remit, our services are designed and delivered to resist re-traumatisation, recognise people’s resilience and support people’s recovery”. The proportion of third/voluntary sector respondents who agreed or strongly agreed (78%) was statistically significantly higher than the proportion within the public sector respondents (36%). These figures are shown in Figure 15.

Figure 15 - Responses to statement about service design within trauma-informed organisations 2024 by sector[10]
The image shows a stacked bar chart with the proportion of responses by sector for the statement Whatever our organisation's remit, our services are designed and delivered to resist re-traumatisation, recognise people's resilience and support people's recovery. The third/voluntary sector had the largest proportion of confident responses at 78%. The proportion of confident responses sits between 36% and 47% for the other three sectors.

In line with the overall trend between surveys, there was a statistically significant increase across all sectors in the proportion of respondents who agreed about the use of feedback in the design and delivery of services. The proportion of third/voluntary sector respondents who agreed increased by more than 35 percent.

For the statement about staff wellbeing, there were only small, non-significant differences over time across most sectors. The rate of agreement for public sector respondents did however show a statistically significant decline from 59 percent in 2021 to 55 percent in 2024.

Table 8 shows the full breakdown of responses by statement broken down by sector for both 2021 and 2024.

Table 8 – Proportion of respondents who said “agree” or “strongly agree” in response to trauma-informed organisation statements in 2021 and 2024 by sector
Question Sector 2021 2024
Leaders at all levels understand, drive and inspire working in a trauma-informed and responsive way Third/voluntary 57% 68%
Other 40% 44%
Private/independent 47% 40%
Public 31% 33%
Staff wellbeing is valued and prioritised Third/voluntary 79% 84%
Private/independent 74% 63%
Other 67% 57%
Public 59% 55%
We continually use feedback to improve how we design and deliver our services Third/voluntary 42% 80%
Private/independent 36% 67%
Other 31% 47%
Public 18% 44%
We routinely create safe and meaningful opportunities to share power with people with lived experience of trauma Third/voluntary 52% 74%
Private/independent 40% 50%
Other 35% 39%
Public 21% 37%
All staff have the knowledge, skills, confidence and capacity to recognise and respond to people affected by trauma, through training and implementation support relevant to their job role and service remit. Third/voluntary NA 59%
Other NA 37%
Private/independent NA 33%
Public NA 29%
Our organisation’s budget includes a long-term commitment to embedding a trauma-informed and responsive approach Third/voluntary NA 38%
Other NA 26%
Private/independent NA 23%
Public NA 20%
Our policies and processes reflect an understanding of the prevalence and impact of trauma Third/voluntary NA 66%
Other NA 49%
Private/independent NA 46%
Public NA 41%
Whatever our organisation’s remit, our services are designed and delivered to resist re-traumatisation, recognise people’s resilience and support people’s recovery Third/voluntary NA 78%
Private/independent NA 47%
Other NA 37%
Public NA 36%

Service Area

As with the individual assessment of confidence and understanding, statements on organisational drivers were also predominately positive for service areas more commonly working in this area day to day, including violence against women and equalities, alcohol and drugs, and mental health.

This trend does differ for some statements. Service areas including employability; learning, development and training; and early years and childcare had high levels of agreement with the statement, “We continually use feedback to improve how we design and deliver our services.” This is the only statement where violence against women and equalities did not have the highest level of agreement. A fell breakdown of responses by service area are shown in Tables 9 to 16, below.

Agreement rates within these sectors has also improved over time in relation to the statement “We continually use feedback to improve how we design and deliver our services”. For example, in 2021, 27 percent of respondents working in learning, development and training agreed or strongly agreed that feedback was used, this increased by 36 percentage points to 63 percent in 2024. Similarly, agreement rates to this statement from respondents working in early years and childcare increased by almost 40 percentage points from 22 percent in 2021 to 61 percent in 2024. The full breakdown of responses to this statement are shown in the following tables and Figure 17 and Figure 17, below.

Table 9 - Proportion of respondents who said “agree” or “strongly agree” in response to “Leaders at all levels understand, drive and inspire working in a trauma-informed and responsive way” in 2021 and 2024 by Service Area
Question Service Area 2021 2024
Leaders at all levels understand, drive and inspire working in a trauma-informed and responsive way Violence against women & equalities 48% 56%
Early years and childcare 38% 46%
Alcohol and drugs 53% 45%
Children & families 41% 44%
Employability 50% 42%
Primary or Secondary Education 40% 41%
Communications NA 39%
Justice 43% 39%
Mental health 45% 39%
Social care and social work 36% 38%
Housing and homelessness 54% 37%
Further or Higher Education 45% 36%
Learning, development & training 45% 35%
Don’t know 20% 35%
Community safety 41% 35%
Human Resources 11% 32%
Finance & administration 20% 26%
Physical health 31% 26%
Digital/Data 19% 24%
Economic development 20% 24%
Emergency Services 24% 17%
Planning/Building Standards 18% 14%
Transport/Roads 18% 11%
Table 10 - Proportion of respondents who said “agree” or “strongly agree” in response to “Staff wellbeing is valued and prioritised” in 2021 and 2024 by Service Area
Question Service Area 2021 2024
Staff wellbeing is valued and prioritised Human Resources 78% 76%
Violence against women & equalities 60% 74%
Employability 70% 73%
Learning, development & training 77% 69%
Economic development 64% 69%
Early years and childcare 69% 65%
Digital/Data 69% 64%
Children & families 65% 63%
Physical health 64% 61%
Alcohol and drugs 68% 61%
Justice 60% 60%
Mental health 68% 60%
Finance & administration 64% 59%
Social care and social work 64% 59%
Further or Higher Education 58% 59%
Communications 50% 58%
Housing and homelessness 67% 56%
Community safety 66% 55%
Primary or Secondary Education 65% 51%
Planning/Building Standards 73% 49%
Don’t know 33% 47%
Transport/Roads 55% 44%
Emergency Services 48% 35%
Table 11 - Proportion of respondents who said “agree” or “strongly agree” in response to “We continually use feedback to improve how we design and deliver our services” in 2021 and 2024 by Service Area
Question Service Area 2021 2024
We continually use feedback to improve how we design and deliver our services Employability 40% 65%
Learning, development & training 27% 63%
Communications NA 63%
Human Resources 11% 61%
Early years and childcare 22% 61%
Further or Higher Education 39% 59%
Violence against women & equalities 32% 57%
Children & families 25% 55%
Digital/Data 19% 51%
Economic development 20% 49%
Social care and social work 28% 49%
Alcohol and drugs 35% 49%
Housing and homelessness 39% 48%
Primary or Secondary Education 23% 48%
Don’t know 33% 47%
Mental health 30% 46%
Justice 25% 45%
Community safety 27% 44%
Physical health 20% 44%
Finance & administration 14% 39%
Planning/Building Standards NA 30%
Transport/Roads 18% 27%
Emergency Services 19% 19%
Table 12 - Proportion of respondents who said “agree” or “strongly agree” in response to “We routinely create safe and meaningful opportunities to share power with people with lived experience of trauma” in 2021 and 2024 by Service Area
Question Service Area 2021 2024
We routinely create safe and meaningful opportunities to share power with people with lived experience of trauma Violence against women & equalities 38% 61%
Alcohol and drugs 43% 57%
Don’t know 27% 53%
Children & families 30% 50%
Employability 20% 49%
Early years and childcare 30% 48%
Communications 50% 45%
Social care and social work 33% 45%
Mental health 33% 45%
Justice 30% 44%
Housing and homelessness 46% 43%
Learning, development & training 29% 40%
Further or Higher Education 42% 40%
Community safety 30% 39%
Human Resources 11% 39%
Primary or Secondary Education 25% 37%
Economic development 20% 33%
Physical health 25% 32%
Digital/Data NA 28%
Finance & administration 15% 27%
Emergency Services 19% 20%
Planning/Building Standards 9% 19%
Transport/Roads 18% 13%
Table 13 - Proportion of respondents who said “agree” or “strongly agree” in response to “All staff have the knowledge, skills, confidence and capacity to recognise and respond to people affected by trauma, through training and implementation support relevant to their job role and service remit” in 2021 and 2024 by Service Area
Question Service Area 2021 2024
All staff have the knowledge, skills, confidence and capacity to recognise and respond to people affected by trauma, through training and implementation support relevant to their job role and service remit. Violence against women & equalities NA 56%
Alcohol and drugs NA 50%
Don’t know NA 41%
Community safety NA 41%
Early years and childcare NA 40%
Children & families NA 40%
Communications NA 40%
Justice NA 38%
Employability NA 37%
Mental health NA 37%
Housing and homelessness NA 35%
Social care and social work NA 35%
Primary or Secondary Education NA 33%
Learning, development & training NA 29%
Further or Higher Education NA 29%
Economic development NA 27%
Physical health NA 24%
Finance & administration NA 23%
Emergency Services NA 21%
Human Resources NA 21%
Digital/Data NA 19%
Transport/Roads NA 13%
Planning/Building Standards NA 9%
Table 14 - Proportion of respondents who said “agree” or “strongly agree” in response to “Our organisation’s budget includes a long-term commitment to embedding a trauma-informed and responsive approach” in 2021 and 2024 by Service Area
Question Service Area 2021 2024
Our organisation’s budget includes a long-term commitment to embedding a trauma-informed and responsive approach Violence against women & equalities NA 38%
Alcohol and drugs NA 31%
Employability NA 31%
Don’t know NA 29%
Community safety NA 29%
Early years and childcare NA 29%
Learning, development & training NA 29%
Housing and homelessness NA 27%
Communications NA 27%
Children & families NA 27%
Human Resources NA 26%
Justice NA 26%
Further or Higher Education NA 25%
Primary or Secondary Education NA 24%
Social care and social work NA 23%
Mental health NA 21%
Physical health NA 15%
Finance & administration NA 15%
Digital/Data NA 13%
Economic development NA 11%
Emergency Services NA 11%
Planning/Building Standards NA 5%
Transport/Roads NA 4%
Table 15 - Proportion of respondents who said “agree” or “strongly agree” in response to “Our policies and processes reflect an understanding of the prevalence and impact of trauma” in 2021 and 2024 by Service Area
Question Service Area 2021 2024
Our policies and processes reflect an understanding of the prevalence and impact of trauma Violence against women & equalities NA 57%
Alcohol and drugs NA 56%
Children & families NA 52%
Early years and childcare NA 51%
Communications NA 49%
Primary or Secondary Education NA 47%
Human Resources NA 47%
Social care and social work NA 46%
Mental health NA 45%
Employability NA 45%
Housing and homelessness NA 45%
Community safety NA 44%
Further or Higher Education NA 44%
Justice NA 42%
Don’t know NA 41%
Learning, development & training NA 40%
Physical health NA 33%
Emergency Services NA 31%
Finance & administration NA 30%
Digital/Data NA 29%
Economic development NA 27%
Planning/Building Standards NA 21%
Transport/Roads NA 15%
Table 16 - Proportion of respondents who said “agree” or “strongly agree” in response to “Whatever our organisation’s remit, our services are designed and delivered to resist re-traumatisation, recognise people’s resilience and support people’s recovery” in 2021 and 2024 by Service Area
Question Service Area 2021 2024
Whatever our organisation’s remit, our services are designed and delivered to resist re-traumatisation, recognise people’s resilience and support people’s recovery Violence against women & equalities NA 60%
Employability NA 56%
Alcohol and drugs NA 56%
Communications NA 52%
Children & families NA 48%
Learning, development & training NA 46%
Early years and childcare NA 45%
Mental health NA 45%
Community safety NA 44%
Social care and social work NA 42%
Justice NA 42%
Don’t know NA 41%
Further or Higher Education NA 41%
Housing and homelessness NA 41%
Primary or Secondary Education NA 40%
Human Resources NA 35%
Physical health NA 30%
Digital/Data NA 28%
Finance & administration NA 28%
Economic development NA 25%
Emergency Services NA 16%
Transport/Roads NA 13%
Planning/Building Standards NA 12%
Figure 16 - Responses to statement about use of feedback in 2021 by Service Area
The image shows a stacked bar chart with the proportion of responses in 2021 by service area for the statement We continually use feedback to improve how we design and deliver our services. Employability, housing & homelessness and further or higher education all had agreement proportions 39%-40%. The remaining service areas had agreement proportions between 0% and 35%.
Figure 17 - Responses to statement about use of feedback in 2021 and 2024 by Service Area[11]
The image shows a stacked bar chart with the proportion of responses in 2024 by service area for the statement We continually use feedback to improve how we design and deliver our services. Employability, L&D & training and Communications all had agreement proportions 63%-65%. The remaining service areas had agreement proportions between 20% and 61%.

Job Role

Respondents from senior management roles were most likely to agree with all trauma-informed organisation statements. A full breakdown of responses by job type is shown in Table 17 and Table 18.

Table 17 - Proportion of respondents who said “agree” or “strongly agree” in response to trauma-informed organisation statements in 2021 and 2024 by Job Role
Question Job Role 2021 2024
Leaders at all levels understand, drive and inspire working in a trauma-informed and responsive way Senior management 55% 63%
Other 45% 40%
Volunteer with no management responsibilities 38% 39%
Middle management 42% 39%
Frontline manager/supervisor/team leader 37% 37%
Practitioner/frontline service delivery/officer with no management responsibilities 32% 34%
Elected official 50% 31%
Staff wellbeing is valued and prioritised Senior management 89% 90%
Middle management 71% 79%
Elected official 70% 69%
Frontline manager/supervisor/team leader 68% 64%
Other 68% 60%
Volunteer with no management responsibilities 67% 52%
Practitioner/frontline service delivery/officer with no management responsibilities 55% 51%
We continually use feedback to improve how we design and deliver our services Senior management 35% 84%
Middle management 22% 62%
Volunteer with no management responsibilities 39% 57%
Other 30% 49%
Frontline manager/supervisor/team leader 23% 49%
Practitioner/frontline service delivery/officer with no management responsibilities 20% 44%
Elected official 30% 43%
We routinely create safe and meaningful opportunities to share power with people with lived experience of trauma Senior management 45% 62%
Volunteer with no management responsibilities 41% 48%
Middle management 29% 46%
Frontline manager/supervisor/team leader 26% 44%
Other 33% 40%
Elected official 30% 40%
Practitioner/frontline service delivery/officer with no management responsibilities 24% 37%
Table 18 - Proportion of respondents who said “agree” or “strongly agree” in response to trauma-informed organisation statements in 2021 and 2024 by Job Role
Question Job Role 2021 2024
All staff have the knowledge, skills, confidence and capacity to recognise and respond to people affected by trauma, through training and implementation support relevant to their job role and service remit. Senior management NA 51%
Other NA 36%
Practitioner/frontline service delivery/officer with no management responsibilities NA 32%
Frontline manager/supervisor/team leader NA 32%
Middle management NA 32%
Volunteer with no management responsibilities NA 26%
Elected official NA 23%
Our organisation’s budget includes a long-term commitment to embedding a trauma-informed and responsive approach Senior management NA 40%
Middle management NA 28%
Volunteer with no management responsibilities NA 26%
Other NA 26%
Frontline manager/supervisor/team leader NA 21%
Elected official NA 20%
Practitioner/frontline service delivery/officer with no management responsibilities NA 20%
Our policies and processes reflect an understanding of the prevalence and impact of trauma Senior management NA 62%
Other NA 45%
Middle management NA 44%
Frontline manager/supervisor/team leader NA 43%
Practitioner/frontline service delivery/officer with no management responsibilities NA 42%
Elected official NA 40%
Volunteer with no management responsibilities NA 39%
Whatever our organisation’s remit, our services are designed and delivered to resist re-traumatisation, recognise people’s resilience and support people’s recovery Senior management NA 68%
Volunteer with no management responsibilities NA 52%
Middle management NA 45%
Frontline manager/supervisor/team leader NA 39%
Other NA 39%
Practitioner/frontline service delivery/officer with no management responsibilities NA 38%
Elected official NA 29%

A large difference in responses between senior management and practitioner level was seen in the statement “Staff wellbeing is valued and prioritised”. Ninety percent of senior management respondents stated that they agreed or strongly agreed with this statement, compared with 51 percent of respondents working as practitioners/frontline service delivery or officers with no management responsibilities. The rates of disagreement for this staff wellbeing statement also increased over time for practitioners from 21 percent in 2021 to 26 percent in 2024. The full breakdown for this statement by job role is displayed in Figure 18.

Respondent comments: “All managers undertake trauma informed practice training, as well as all front-line staff. Managers then use toolbox talks to cascade this learning. Limited time to ensure this is embedded properly, but we are trying!”

Figure 18 - Responses to statement about staff wellbeing in 2021 and 2024 by Job Role[12]
The image shows 2 stacked bar charts, one for 2021 and one for 2024, with the proportion of responses by job role for the statement Staff wellbeing is valued and prioritised. In both years senior management had the largest agreement response and this has increased between 2021 (89%) and 2024 (90%). For the remaining job roles (except middle management), the proportion of agreement responses decreased between 2021 and 2024.

The proportion of respondents who disagreed with the statement “Leaders at all levels understand, drive and inspire working in a trauma-informed and responsive way” increased across all job roles, aside from volunteers where the sample size was very small. The increase in disagreement was statistically significant for middle management, frontline management, and practitioners. A breakdown for this statement is shown in Figure 19.

Figure 19 - Responses to statement relating to leadership in 2021 and 2024 by Job Role[13]
The image shows 2 stacked bar charts, one for 2021 and one for 2024, with the proportion of responses by job role for the statement Leaders at all levels understand, drive and inspire working in a trauma-informed and responsive way. In both years senior management had the largest agreement response and this has increased between 2021 (89%) and 2024 (90%). For the remaining job roles the proportion of agreement responses in 2024 sits between 31% and 40% and has decreased between 2021 and 2024 for most job roles.

However, for the statement “We continually use feedback to improve how we design and deliver our services”, agreement rates significantly increased between surveys for all job roles, except volunteers and elected officials where the sample sizes were small. This is shown in Figure 20.

Figure 20 - Responses to statement about use of feedback in 2021 and 2024 by Job Role[14]
The image shows 2 stacked bar charts, one for 2021 and one for 2024, with the proportion of responses by job role for the statement We continually use feedback to improve how we design and deliver our services. The proportion of agreement responses has increased between 2021 and 2024 for all job roles. The proportion of agreement responses in 2024 sits between 43% and 84% across job roles.

Contact

Email: ACEstrauma@gov.scot

Back to top