Negative Emissions Technologies (NETS): Feasibility Study - Technical Appendices
Technical annex for study that estimates the maximum Negative Emissions Technologies (NETs) potential achievable in Scotland, 2030 - 2050.
Table of tables
Table 2: Planned CO2 capture at bioethanol production sites
Table 3: List of UK-based biofuel projects that failed to pass Phase 2 of the CCUS fund
Table 4: List of currently operational bio-gasification and bio-syngas plants
Table 5: List of planned BECCS Hydrogen projects outside of the UK
Table 6: List of planned BECCS Hydrogen projects within the UK
Table 7: Breakdown in DAC pilot plants currently operational
Table 8: Breakdown in DAC projects that are under development
Table 9: List of global planned biochar projects
Table 10: Breakdown in TRL description
Table 11. Biomass conversion technologies
Table 12. Types of carbon capture methods
Table 13. Types of CO2 capture technologies
Table 14: Breakdown in energy demands and carbon removal for each DACCS technology
Table 15. International NETs policy support
Table 16: Chemical and energy properties of biogenic and non-biogenic fuels
Table 17: Solid biomass resource; current, 2030 and 2045 projections
Table 18: Non-solid biomass resource; current, 2030 and 2045 projections
Table 19: Non-solid biomass resource; current, 2030 and 2045 projections, table presented in MWh
Table 20: Breakdown in typical CO2 transportation and storage costs
Table 21: Breakdown in typical CO2 transportation and storage costs according to the IEAGHG
Table 22: Transport costs used in the LCOC analysis
Table 23: Storage costs used in the LCOC analysis
Table 24. Costs of different BECCS power technology types
Table 25: Breakdown in CAPEX for two EfW-CCS combustion plants in the Netherlands[77]
Table 26. TRL of applying CO2 capture to industrial sectors
Table 27: Breakdown of costs for cement, wood-based products, and fermentation with CCS
Table 28: Breakdown of gasification costs to produce hydrogen.
Table 29: Breakdown in SMR-CCS and ATR-CCS costs
Table 30: Breakdown in biomass and waste gasification costs to produce biomethane
Table 31: Breakdown in biomass and waste anaerobic digestion costs produce biomethane
Table 32: Composition of gas pre- and post- biogas upgrading
Table 33: Breakdown in DACCS costs for different configurations
Table 34: Breakdown in biochar costs provided by Shackley et al
Table 35: Costs and GHG footprints associated with biofuel production
Table 36: Fermentation and other capturable CO2 from bioethanol production
Table 37: NETs potential per year; all values are in MtCO2
Table 38: CAPEX per year, all values are in £M
Table 39: OPEX per year, all values are in £M
Table 40: A list of sites disregarded from our analysis
Table 41: BECCS Biomethane data point summary
Table 42: BECCS Power data point summary
Table 43: BECCS Industry data point summary
Table 44: BECCS AD data point summary
Table 45: BECCS Fermentation data point summary
Table 46: BECCS EfW/ACT data point summary
Table 47: Fermentation CO2 production rates comparison
Table 48: BECCS Power and Industry (wood) CO2 production rates comparison
Table 49: Waste input rate comparison of EfW/ACT sites
Table 50: EfW/ACT CO2 production potential comparison
Table 51: A breakdown in parameters used to model NETs carbon capture potential
Table 52: A breakdown in the definitions of the various parameters used to determine LCOC
Table 53: OPEX and CAPEX comparison used in modelling
Table 54: Figures used to convert costs into British Pounds Sterling and scaled for inflation
Table 55: proposed CCUS projects located in the UK
Table 56: List of existing and proposed EfW sites in Scotland
Table 57: Projects covered by the DAC and GHG Removal technologies competition
Table 58. TRL of applying CO2 capture to steel sector
Table 59: Costs associated with steel industry BECCS
Table 60: Life cycle GWP emissions of various steel manufacturing methods
Contact
Email: NETs@gov.scot
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback