Scottish scientific electrofishery for razor clams trial - biological and ecological goals: progress report

Report summarising data and main findings from the trial to date.


3. Results of biological data analysis

Length-weight relationships (LWR) are required to convert survey estimates (sizes of razor clams and numeric density) into biomass (weights) in the surveyed areas. Data were utilised from 5130 live razor clams from eight trial areas (Broad Bay, Coll and Tiree, Colonsay, Sound of Sleat, Firth of Clyde, Gigha, Wigtown Bay, Firth of Forth), across the four sampling zones (Outer Hebrides, West Coast NW, West Coast SW, Firth of Forth) from 2018 to 2020 (Table 5).

Table 5: Number of razor clams (E. siliqua) sampled and analysed for length-weight relationships by zone, trial area and year (2018-2020) as part of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial.
Zone Trial Area Number of razor clams
2018 2019 2020
Outer Hebrides Broad Bay 118 431 100
West Coast NW Coll and Tiree 51 118 -
West Coast NW Colonsay 82 - 165
West Coast NW Sound of Sleat - 153 -
West Coast SW Firth of Clyde 565 636 89
West Coast SW Gigha 301 484 -
West Coast SW Wigtown Bay 102 301 -
Firth of Forth Firth of Forth 560 659 215

The razor clam LWR was derived using linear modelling and analysed using ANOVA. The factors of Trial Area and Trial Zone are linked with the Trial Areas being within the larger scale Trial Zones. While both are statistically significant in describing the LWR, it was decided to only include Trial Area as an explanatory variable to allow for more fine scale analysis, and stock assessments would be undertaken at this spatial resolution. Additionally, the variable of month was investigated but due to a lack of seasonal data for all trial areas it was decided not to include this in the final model. Length was log-transformed as a covariate, Trial Area as a factor and Weight (also log-transformed) as the dependent variable. The final model had a high coefficient of determination (R2= 0.96) with F8, 5107 = 7863, p < 0.001 (Table 6.).

Table 6: Descriptive statistics and estimated parameters of length-weight relationships (LWR) for razor clams for eight of the trial areas in Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial. LWR derived using linear modelling and compared using ANOVA. N = number of razor clams included for LWR analyses.
Trial Area N Len min (mm) Len max (mm) Wt min (g) Wt max (g) Log(a) a 95%CI (a) b 95%CI (b) p
Broad Bay 649 91.09 230 9.8 161.3 -12.814 0.00000272 ±0.239 3.293 ±3.340 < 0.001
Coll and Tiree 169 75.37 211 4.1 131.2 -12.694 0.00000307 ±0.449 3.289 ±3.379 > 0.1
Colonsay 247 54.6 210.5 1 160.7 -13.076 0.00000209 ±0.502 3.353 ±3.453 > 0.1
Firth of Clyde 1290 65.73 215 3.4 132.7 -12.284 0.00000462 ±0.315 3.208 ±3.271 < 0.001
Firth of Forth 1434 60.61 216 2.5 156 -13.359 0.00000158 ±0.307 3.425 ±3.485 < 0.001
Gigha 785 104.44 210 13.9 128.9 -11.242 0.00001311 ±0.396 2.995 ±3.073 < 0.001
Sound of Sleat 153 75.56 220 3.6 152.1 -13.413 0.0000015 ±0.559 3.421 ±3.536 < 0.05
Wigtown Bay 403 98.54 210.24 9.4 126.2 -12.736 0.00000294 ±0.468 3.296 ±3.388 > 0.1

For the maturity analyses, a total of 6338 live razor clams were sampled from August 2018 to December 2022 (Table 7). Not all trial zones or areas were sampled consistently, with most razor clams from the Firth of Clyde (total of 2053 razor clams over the time period) and Firth of Forth (1746 razor clams over the time period).

Table 7: Number of live razor clams (E. siliqua) sampled for sex and maturity analyses from each trial zone and area across trial years 1-5 (August 2018 to December 2022) as part of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial.
Zone Trial Area Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Outer Hebrides Broad Bay 118 431 45 55 60
West coast NW Sound of Sleat 153 20
Coll and Tiree 51 118
Colonsay 82 120 53 25
West coast SW Gigha 301 484
Firth of Clyde 565 725 253 510
Wigtown Bay 203 200
Firth of Forth Firth of Forth 660 615 159 237 75
Total 1980 2726 324 598 690

E. siliqua are generally gonochoric (with two distinct sexes: Darriba et al., 2005, Gaspar and Monteiro 1998) although previous work highlighted it was extremely difficult to accurately determine sex based on macroscopic examination (Marine Scotland, 2020). The gonads of E. siliqua displayed colour differentiation with female gonads a whitish colour and milky texture, and male gonads beige in colour with a more granular texture (Figure 7). However, it can be very challenging to distinguish between the two sexes and staff have to be trained appropriately to recognise the differences.

Figure 7: a) male gonad (beige and granular); b) female gonad (whitish colour and a milky texture).
A figure with an image showing a picture of a male gonad (beige and granular) on the right and a female gonad (whitish colour and a milky texture) on the left.

A total of 1468 razor clams (out of the 6338 live razor clams sampled) were further analysed by histological examination; 632 were identified as male, 731 as female, and two as hermaphrodite (Table 8). It was not possible to identify the sex of 103 of the razor clams because the individuals were in stage ‘0’ and either only protogonia cells were present or almost no gonadal tissue was available to be sampled. The data collected will undergo further analyses (samples are yet to be processed) and will be included as part of the PhD study in collaboration with SAMS.

Table 8: Number and descriptive statistics for live razor clams (E. siliqua) analysed for histology to identify the sex as part of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial.
Sex Statistics 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
Unidentified (U) No. individuals 6 1 50 46 103
Min length (mm) 143.3 151.2 67.8 68.6
Max length (mm) 199.9 151.2 191.7 211.4
Mean length (mm) 176.6 151.2 129.5 114.7
Mean weight (g) 83.7 40.5 35.1 26.6
Male (M) No. individuals 112 32 168 320 632
Min length (mm) 80.4 83.6 87.7 70.6
Max length (mm) 203 195.5 198.5 209
Mean length (mm) 150.4 153.5 155.4 159.1
Mean weight (g) 49.2 45.5 54.5 60.3
Female (F) No. individuals 112 35 226 358 731
Min length (mm) 75.6 88.8 66.6 71.3
Max length (mm) 210 201.7 199.6 215.3
Mean length (mm) 151.7 154.2 153.9 158.9
Mean weight (g) 51 48.1 53.6 59.5
Hermaphrodite (H) No. individuals 1 1 2
Min length (mm) 148.8 160.2
Max length (mm) 148.8 160.2
Mean length (mm) 148.8 160.2
Mean weight (g) 46.7 44.9

The examination of histological sections of razor clam gonad identified six different stages (0, I, II, IIIA, IIIB, IV) of gonad development (Darriba et al., 2005, Gaspar and Monteiro 1998). Full images and description of the stages are available in Appendix 6.

Investigation of the length frequency distribution of the live razor clams sampled for histology revealed that only 50 individuals were under the minimum landing size (MLS) of 100 mm (Figure 8). Of these individuals, 40 (80%) were identified as stage 0, with one individual identified as stage IIIB (spawning) and one as stage IV (exhausted). The smallest razor clam observed at stage IIIA (ripe) was 106 mm, whilst a razor clam of 98 mm was observed to be actively spawning (IIIB) and two razor clams were observed as stage IV (exhausted) with lengths of 92 and 93 mm.

Figure 8: Length distributions of razor clams (E. siliqua) analysed for histology to identify sex and stages of gonad development (0 to IV) as part of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial. The dashed line indicates 100 mm which is the minimum landing size (MLS) for razor clams.
A figure with 6 bar plots showing length-frequency (length values on the X-axis and number of individuals at a certain value of length – frequency, on the Y- axis) of razor clams (E.siliqua) analysed for histology to identify sex and stages of gonad development (0- IV) as part of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial. The dashed line indicates 100 mm which is the minimum landing size (MLS) for razor clams. There is a bar plot for each of the gonad stages, with females, males and unidentified represented.

Between January and March, 67.5% of razor clams were identified as stage II with increased follicles. In April and May, 70% of razor clams were observed to be stage IIIA and IIIB: this is when individuals are ripe and actively spawning (Figure 9). For the summer months (July and August) 81% of razor clams were identified as stage 0 with resting gonads. Razor clams were also observed at stage IV (exhaustion) between April and September. From October to December, razor clams were classified at stage I and the process of gametogenesis began again.

Figure 9: Monthly gametogenesis stages of razor clams (E. siliqua) analysed by histological sampling as part of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial. Gametogenesis stage IIIA and IIIB are the ripening and spawning stages of razor clams.
A figure with a bar plot using stacked columns to display the monthly gametogenesis stages of razor clams (E.siliqua) analysed by histological sampling as part of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial. The X-axis is the calendar month (1-12) and the Y-axis is the percentage of razor class found at each gametogenesis stage, for each month. Gametogenesis stage IIIA and IIIB are the ripening and spawning stages of razor clams, found throughout March-June.

Full images and description of the stages are available in Appendix 6.

Contact

Email: mss.fisheries.advice@gov.scot

Back to top