Scottish scientific electrofishery for razor clams trial - biological and ecological goals: progress report

Report summarising data and main findings from the trial to date.


4. Razor clam fishery and stock assessments

A maximum number of 28 vessels are derogated to participate in the trial electrofishery for razor clams at any given time (Table 9). There have been a number of changes to the vessels participating in the trial and a vessel may leave the trial with its derogation moved to another vessel within the same calendar year, but this is at the discretion of MD policy colleagues. During trial year four there were 29 different vessels derogated due to one vessel leaving and subsequently being replaced in the same trial year.

Table 9: Number of vessels derogated to fish (and in brackets the number of vessels actively fishing as detected by REM) in each trial zone for Trial Years 1-5 as part of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery Trial. Year 4 has a total of 29 vessels derogated due to one vessel leaving and being replaced in the same trial year.
Trial Year Trial Period West Coast SW West Coast NW Outer Hebrides Firth of Forth Total
Year 1 Feb 2018 – Jan 2019 13 (13) 7 (5) 2 (2) 4 (4) 26 (24)
Year 2 Feb 2019 – Jan 2020 13 (12) 8 (7) 3 (3) 5 (5) 28 (28)
Year 3 Feb 2020 – Jan 2021 13 (13) 8 (4) 3 (1) 4 (4) 28 (22)
Year 4 Feb 2021 – Jan 2022 13 (13) 8 (7) 3 (2) 5 (4) 29 (26)
Year 5 Feb 2022 – Jan 2023 12 (11) 9 (7) 3 (1) 4 (4) 28 (23)

The West Coast SW trial zone has the highest number of vessels, with 13 vessels typically fishing for razor clams each year. Reported landings and the number of days fished are also highest for this zone (Figure 10). Landings are lowest from the Outer Hebrides where only one or two vessels regularly target razor clams as part of the electrofishery trial.

Figure 10: Razor clam landings (tonnes) reported for each trial zone for Trial Years 1-5 as part of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial, the total number of days of fishing activity is printed above each bar.
A figure with 4 bar plots showing the razor clam landings (tonnes) reported for each trial zone (Outer Hebrides, West Coast NW, West Coast SW and Firth of Forth) for Trial Years 1-5 as part of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial. The total number of days of fishing activity is printed on each bar. The X-axis is the trial year (1-5) and the Y-axis is the total landings (tonnes) for each of the trial zone per trial year.

Landings of razor clams are typically highest between April and August, although in Trial Year 1 vessels were still entering the trial fishery and in Trial Year 3 fishing was stopped because of COVID-19. Landings typically decline at the end of the year because of poorer weather (Figure 11).

Figure 11: Razor clam landings (tonnes) reported for each month of Trial Years 1-5 by zone as part of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial.
A figure with five bar plots showing the razor clam landings (tonnes) reported for each month of trial years 1-5 by trial zone (Outer Hebrides, West Coast NW, West Coast SW and Firth of Forth) as part of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial. Each bar plot represents one trial year. The X- axis is the calendar month (1-12) and the Y-axis is the total landings (tonnes) for each of the trial zone per calendar month. The majority of the landings on all years and for most of the months throughout the year, come for West Coast SW.

Most fishing vessels on the razor clam trial are not utilising the daily landing limits (Figure 12). Vessels fishing in the West Coast SW, West Coast NW and Firth of Forth have increased their percentage use of allowed daily landing limits over the Trial Years 1-5, and this also corresponds to the increase in the number of fishing days (Figure 13).

Figure 12: The percentage of the daily landing limit used by each vessel for each trial year within each zone of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial. This was calculated from the total landed weight from each vessel in each year of the trial by the maximum allowed yearly limit of 49,500kg (450kg/day over 110 days).
A figure with five bar plot showing the percentage of the daily landing limit used by each vessel for each trial year within each zone of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial.
Figure 13: The percentage of the maximum allowed fishing days used by each vessel for each trial year within each zone of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial. This was calculated from product of the total number of days of activity for each vessel in each year of the trial by the maximum allowed days (110 days per year).
A figure with five bar plot showing the percentage of the maximum allowed fishing days used by each vessel for each trial year within each zone of the Scottish razor clam electrofishery trial (Outer Hebrides, West Coast NW, West Coast SW and Firth of Forth).

A summary of fishing activity for each trial area within the four zones is provided in Appendix 4. Landings per unit effort (LPUE) were calculated as landings (kg) per hour fished by dividing the reported landings (kg) by the number of hours fished (derived from REM) for each vessel on each day fished. This revealed different trends in each trial area. An increase in the LPUE was observed for Broad Bay and Colonsay, the LPUE appears stable in Coll and Tiree, but decreasing in Clyde, Wigtown Bay and Firth of Forth. However, these trends should be interpreted with caution because of some very high starting points, the changes in vessels at different times in the trial fishery, and in context of the spatial footprint of the fishing activity.

The overall spatial footprint of the razor clam electrofishery is small, with grounds typically targeted close to the shore to a maximum depth of approximately 10 m (see spatial plots provided for each trial area in Appendix 4). Only a small portion of the trial areas are fished due to the sediment habitat of razor clams, the depths that can safely be fished using this method (length of wires and safety of divers), and the requirement for the areas to be classified by Food Standards Scotland. Fishing activity is highest in the Clyde, which corresponds with the highest number of vessels and landings of razor clams.

Length Cohort Analysis

Estimates of fishing mortality in relation to FMSY estimated from the LCAs are shown in Table 10. For both areas, this is the first stock assessment for razor clams, and Fmax from this assessment was used as a proxy for FMSY (i.e., Fmax = FMSY). This is aligned with approaches that have been applied to crab, lobsters and Nephrops assessments using LCAs (ICES, 2010; Mesquita et al., 2023). In addition, given the influence of growth parameters on the LCAs, different combinations of these parameters were used in the assessment to better understand the sensitivity of LCA (and the resulting perception of stock status) to these parameters.

For both areas in all scenarios, fishing mortality (Fbar) is estimated to be below FMSY. For most scenarios (excluding scenario 1 for the Firth of Forth and scenario 7 for both areas), the FMSY proxy was not estimated because there was no maximum value of Fmax found over the range examined up to 500% increase on Fbar (500% is the maximum increase on Fbar allowed by the LCA software programme used to perform these assessments, see Table 10).

Table 10: Razor clam stock status and relationship between Fbar and FMSY and Harvest Rates (derived from Fbar) for 2020-22, at various combinations of growth parameters with the Linf values of 196 or 207 mm, K of 0.11 or 0.27 and M of 0.1 or 0.16.
Scenario Area Growth parameters Fbar position
to FMSY
Linf (mm) K M Fbar FMSY
1 Firth of Clyde 196 0.11 0.1 0.008 >0.05* below
Firth of Forth 0.02 >0.12* below
2 Firth of Clyde 196 0.11 0.16 0.003 >0.02* below
Firth of Forth 0.006 >0.04* below
3 Firth of Clyde 196 0.27 0.1 0.06 >0.34* below
Firth of Forth 0.14 0.54 below
4 Firth of Clyde 196 0.27 0.16 0.04 >0.22* below
Firth of Forth 0.09 >0.53* below
5 Firth of Clyde 207 0.11 0.1 0.03 >0.18* below
Firth of Forth 0.07 >0.43* below
6 Firth of Clyde 207 0.11 0.16 0.01 >0.06* below
Firth of Forth 0.03 >0.16* below
7 Firth of Clyde 207 0.27 0.1 0.17 0.43 below
Firth of Forth 0.35 0.62 below
8 Firth of Clyde 207 0.27 0.16 0.12 >0.71* below
Firth of Forth 0.26 >1.06* below

* FMSY proxy exact value not calculated as FMSY > 6*Fbar (FMSY not found over the effort range examined of up to 500% increase on Fbar).

Geostatistics and survey-based abundance estimates

Largo Bay (fishing grounds within the Firth of Forth trial area) razor clam densities were calculated based on 2020 survey data collected by SAMS (Fox, 2021) (Figure 14). The density of razor clams (for all sizes) was highest in the central part of the survey area. Razor clams were also observed in the southwestern region and in deeper waters, which are typically not fished because of the need for longer cables and the increased time divers would spend underwater.

Figure 14: Razor clam density (mean razor clams per m2) for the Largo Bay fishing grounds (located within the Firth of Forth trial area and part of the electrofishery trial). The estimation area is bounded by the solid black line with the main fishing area to the north and eastern area of the dotted black line. Razor clam density data (for all sizes) shown as orange circles where circle radius is relative to field survey sample density. This was calculated from the 2020 razor clam survey data (Fox, 2021).
Figure showing the razor clam density (mean razor clams per m2) for the Largo Bay fishing grounds (located within the Firth of Forth trial area and part of the electrofishery trial). The estimation area is bounded by the solid black line with the main fishing area to the north and eastern area of the dotted black line. Razor clam density data (for all sizes) shown as orange circles where circle radius is relative to field survey sample density. This was calculated from the 2020 razor clam survey data (Fox, 2021).

For each razor clam size category, an experimental variogram was calculated from the 2020 razor clam survey density data, to which exponential variogram models were fitted (Figure 15). Sensitivity of abundance estimates to variogram lag parameters was tested (Appendix 1).

Figure 15: Variogram calculated for razor clam (<100 mm) for the Largo Bay fishing grounds (located within the Firth of Forth trial area and part of the electrofishery trial). This was calculated from the 2020 razor clam survey data (Fox, 2021). The experimental variogram is represented by the dashed orange line, and the model variogram is represented by the solid orange line.
A figure with a plot showing a variogram calculated for razor clam (<100 mm) for the Largo Bay fishing grounds (located within the Firth of Forth trial area and part of the electrofishery trial). This was calculated from the 2020 razor clam survey data (Fox, 2021). The experimental variogram is represented by the dashed orange line, and the model variogram is represented by the solid orange line. The X-axis is the distance measured in nautical miles and the Y-axis is the semi variance.

Spatially explicit swept-area based razor clam density estimates were obtained from the 2020 Largo Bay field survey, for four size categories: all sizes, <100 mm, >100 mm, and >150 mm total shell lengths. Kriged surface grids provide illustrative maps of the spatial distribution of each size category of razor clams within the Largo Bay stock area (Figure 16). The highest densities of razor clams occurred around the 5 m bathymetric contour, although this spatial pattern was less apparent in the <100 mm and >150 mm size classes.

Figure 16: Kriged razor clam density surfaces for each size category sampled in Largo Bay (fishing ground within the Firth of Forth trial area), based on 2020 razor clam survey density data (Fox, 2021). Darker red pixels represent areas of higher estimated razor clam density, and lighter yellow pixels represent areas of lower estimated density. Cream coloured pixels represent areas where razor clam are absent. The black dotted line is a 5 m bathymetric contour.
A figure with four plots showing a kriged razor clam density surfaces for each size category sampled in A figure with four plots showing a kriged razor clam density surfaces for each size category sampled in Largo Bay (fishing ground within the Firth of Forth trial area), based on 2020 razor clam survey density data (Fox, 2021). Each plot aggregates different sizes ( all sizes, less than 100mm, more than 100mm and more than 150mm). Darker red pixels represent areas of higher estimated razor clam density, and lighter yellow pixels represent areas of lower estimated density. Cream coloured pixels represent areas where razor clam are absent. The black dotted line is a 5 m bathymetric contour.

The majority of estimated razor clam abundance in Largo Bay was composed of individuals from the greater than 100 mm size category (Figure 17), with lower estimated abundances of razor clams in the larger (>150 mm) and smaller (<100 mm) size classes.

Figure 17: Abundance estimates for each size category of Largo Bay razor clam; and razor clams from the Miekle Bay and Croy Bay surveys (the majority of clams measured in both Clyde surveys were >100 mm).
A figure showing a plot with the abundance estimates for each size category of Largo Bay razor clam (all sizes, <100mm, >100mm and >150mm); and razor clams from the Miekle Bay and Croy Bay surveys (majority measured in both Clyde surveys >100 mm).

Harvest rates for each size category of estimated abundance in Largo Bay are presented in Table 11. The highest harvest rate was estimated as 11.83% for razor clams >150 mm (self-sample length frequencies for razor clams in Largo Bay in 2020 ranged from 145-215 mm).

Table 11: Harvest rates calculated for each razor clam abundance size category estimated from the 2020 Largo Bay (part of the Firth of Forth trial area) razor clam survey (Fox, 2021).
Size Category Abundance (millions) Removals (millions) Harvest Rate (%)
All Sizes 15.57 0.64 4.14
< 100 mm 4.30 0.00 0.00
> 100 mm 11.30 0.64 5.70
> 150 mm 5.42 0.64 11.83

Contact

Email: mss.fisheries.advice@gov.scot

Back to top