Salmon farming - use of acoustic deterrent devices: report

8. References

1. Scottish Fish Farm Production Survey 2020. Marine Scotland Directorate. ISBN: 978180201434197

2. www.salmonscotland.co.uk

3. Scottish Government (2021). Acoustic Deterrent Device (ADD) Use in the Aquaculture Sector. Parliamentary Report4

4. Northridge, S., Coram, A. & Gordon, J. (2013). Investigations on Seal Depredation at Scottish Fish Farms. Report to Marine Scotland

5. Coram, A., Ragnarsson, V., Thomas, L., Sparling, C.E. (2022). Use and efficacy of Acoustic Deterrent Devices (ADDs) in Aquaculture. Report to Marine Scotland, Scottish Government

6. Seal Licensing - Scottish Government; www.scot.gov.

7. Thompson, D., Coram, A.J., Harris, R.N. and Sparling, C.E. (2020). Review of non-lethal seal control options to limit seal predation on salmonids in rivers and fish farms. Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science Vol 12 No 6.

8. Marine Scotland (2021). Aquaculture Code of Practice Containment of and Prevention of Escape of Fish on Fish Farms in relation to Marine Mammal Interactions

9. Brandt, M.J., Höschle, C., Diederichs, A., Betke, K., Matuschek, R., Witte, S. and Nehls, G., (2013). Far‐reaching effects of a seal scarer on harbour porpoises, Phocoena phocoena. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 23(2), pp.222-232

10. www.naturescot (prevalence and geographical location of marine mammals)

11. Götz, T. and Janik, V.M. (2013). Acoustic deterrent devices to prevent pinniped depredation: efficiency, conservation concerns and possible solutions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 492: 285-302.

12. Lepper, P.A., Gordon, J., Booth, C., Theobald, P., Robinson, S.P., Northridge, S. & Wang, L. (2014). Establishing the sensitivity of cetaceans and seals to acoustic deterrent devices in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 517.

13. Marine Scotland (2020) The protection of Marine European Protected Species from injury and disturbance Guidance for Scottish Inshore Waters (July 2020 Version)

14. Marine Scotland, Scottish Government (2021). Information Note and Frequently Asked Questions for the Operators of Finfish Farms on the use of Acoustic Deterrent Devices and the Requirement for a European Protected Species Licence.

15. Götz, T. and Janik, V.M. (2010). Aversiveness of sounds in phocid seals:Psycho-physiological factors, learning processes and motivation. The Journal of Experimental Biology 213(9): 1536–1548.

16. Findlay et al (2021). Auditory impairment from acoustic seal deterrents predicted for harbour porpoises in a marine protected area. Journal of Applied Ecology 58:1631-1642.

17. Mepham, B. (1996) Food Ethics. New York, USA, Routledge.

18. Biasetti, P, de Mori, B (2021) The Ethical Matrix as a tool for decision making process in conservation. Frontiers in Environmental Science 9, 584636.

19. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW); Guidance on risk assessment for animal welfare.

EFSA Journal 2012;10(1):2513. 30 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2513. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal

20. Dubois, S., Fenwicj, N., Ryan, E.A., Baker, L., Baker, S.E., Beausoleil, N.J., Carter, S., Cartwright, B.,, Costa, F., Draper, C., Griffin, J., Grogan, A., Howald, G., Jones, B., Littin, K.E., Lombard, A.T., Mellor, D.J., Ramp, D., Schuppli, C.A. and Fraser. D. (2017). International consensus principles for ethical wildlife control. Conservation Biology, Volume 31, No. 4, 753–760.

21. Olla, B.L., Davis, M. and Shreck, C.B. (1997) Effects of simulated trawling on sablefish and walleye pollock: the role of light intensity, net velocity and towing duration. Fish Biology, 50, 1181-1194.

22. Hjelmstedt, P., Brijs, J., Berg, C., Axelsson, M., Sandblom, E., Roques, J.A.C., Sundh, H., Sundell, K., Kiessling, A., and Gräns, A. (2012). Continuous physiological welfare evaluation of European whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) during common aquaculture practices leading up to slaughter Aquaculture 534: 736258

23. Barcellos, L.J.G., Ritter, F., Kreutz, L.C., Quevedo, R.M., da Silva, L.B., Bedin, A.C., Finco, J. and Cericato, L. (2007). Whole-body cortisol increases after direct and visual contact with a predator in zebrafish, Danio rerio. Aquaculture 272: 774–778

24. Xu, J-J., Fu, S-J. and Fu, C. (2019). Physiological and behavioral stress responses to predators are altered by prior predator experience in juvenile qingbo (Spinibarbus sinensis). Biology Open 8, bio041012. doi:10.1242/bio.041012

25. Fu, C., Yi, L-C., Wu, W=P., Sun, C-X., Liu, R-N. and Fu, S-J. (2021). Qingbo, a common cyprinid fish, responds diversely in behavior and locomotion to predators with different hunting modes. Fish Physiol Biochem 47: 1415–1427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-021-00988-9

26. Hammerschlag, N., Meyer, M., Seakamela, S.M., Kirkman, S., Fallows, C. and Creel, S. (2017) Physiological stress responses to natural variation in predation risk: evidence from white sharks and seals. Ecology, 98, 3199-2210.

27. Dwyer, C.M. (2004). How has the risk of predation shaped the behavioural responses of sheep to fear and distress? Animal Welfare 13(3): 269-281

28. Van Liere, D., Dwyer, C., Jordan, D., Premik-Banič, A., Valenčič, A., Kompan, D. and Siard, N. (2013). Farm characteristics in Slovene wolf habitat related to attacks on sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 144: 46-56.

29. Dwyer, C.M. and Bornett, H.L.I. (2004) Chronic stress in sheep: assessment tools and their use in different management conditions. Animal Welfare 13(3): 293-304.

30. Allen. B.L. and Hampton, J.O., (2020). Minimizing animal welfare harms associated with predation management in agro-ecosystems. Biological Reviews 95: 1097-1108.

31. Mooney, T.A., Yamato, M. and Branstetter, B.K. (2012). Hearing in cetaceans: From natural history to experimental biology. In: Advances in Marine Biology, Volume 63. Elsevier Ltd.

32. Southall , B.L., Bowles, A.E., Ellison, W.T., Finneran, J.J., Gentry, R.L., Greene, C.R. Jr., Kastak, D., Ketten, D.R., Miller,J.H., Nachtigall, P.E., Richardson,W.J., Thomas, J.A. and Tyack, P.L. (2008). Marine Mammal Noise-Exposure Criteria: Initial Scientific Recommendations, Bioacoustics, 17:1-3, 273-275, DOI:10.1080/09524622.2008.9753846

33. Southall, B., Finneran, J.J., Reichmuth, C., Nachtigall, P.E., Ketten, D.R., Bowles, A.E., Ellison, W.T., Nowacek, D.P. Tyack, P. (2019) Marine Mammal Noise Exposure Criteria: Updated Scientific Recommendations for Residual Hearing Effects

34. Kastelein, R.A., Wensveen, P.J., and Hoek, L. (2009). Underwater detection of tonal signals between 0.125 and 100kHz by harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125, 1222 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3050283

35. Kastelein, R.A., Schop, J., Hoek, L., and Covi, J. (2015). Hearing thresholds of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) for narrow-band sweeps. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 138 (4), 2508-2512.

36. Finneran, J.J., Houser, D.S., Blasko, D., et al., (2008). Estimating bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) hearing thresholds from single and multiple simultaneous auditory evoked potentials. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123, 542 (2008); doi: 10.1121/1.2812595

37. Bransetter, B.K., St. Leger, J., Acton, D., Stewart, J., Houser, D., Finneran, J.J., Jenkins, K. (2017). Killer whale (Orcinus orca) behavioral audiograms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141 (4), April 2017: 2387-2398.

38. Ketten D. R, and Mountain D (2011) Modeling minke whale hearing. Final report submitted to the Joint Industry Program by WHOI & Boston University

39. Boisseau, O., McGarry, T., Stephenson, S., Compton, R., Cucknell, A-C., Ryan, C., McLanaghan, R. and Moscrop, A. (2021). Minke whales avoid a 15kHz acoustic deterrent device. Marine Ecology Progress Series. DOI: 10.3354/meps13690

40. Johnston, D. W. (2002). The effect of acoustic harassment devices on harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Biological Conservation 108: 113-118

41. Morton, A. B. and Symonds, H. K. (2002). Displacement of Orcinus orca (L.) by high amplitude sound in British Columbia, Canada. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59: 71-80

42. Olesiuk, P. F., Nichol, L.M., Sowden, M.J. and Ford, J.K.B. (2002). Effect of the sound generated by an acoustic harassment device on the relative abundance and distribution of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in Retreat Passage, British Columbia. Marine Mammal Science 18: 843-862

43. Northridge, S.P., Gordon, J.G., Booth, C., Calderan, S., Cargill, A., Coram, A., Gillespie, D., Lonergan, M. and Webb, A. (2010). Assessment of the impacts and utility of acoustic deterrent devices. Final Report to the Scottish Aquaculture Research Forum, Project Code SARF044. 34 pp.

44. Findlay, C.R., Hastie, G.D., Farcas, A., Merchant, N.D., Risch, D. and Wilson, B. (2022). Exposure of individual harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and waters surrounding protected habitats to acoustic deterrent noise from aquaculture. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 32(5): 766-780.

45. Hammond, PS, Lacey, C., Gilles, A., Viquerat, S., Börjesson, P., Herr, H., Macleod, K., Ridoux, V., Santos, M.B., Scheidat, M., Teilmann, J., Vingadam J and Øien, N. (2021) Estimates of cetacean abundance in European Atlantic waters in summer 2016 from the SCANS-III aerial and shipboard surveys.

46. Gordon, J., Blight, C., Bryant, E. and Thompson, D. (2019). Measuring responses of harbour seals to potential aversive acoustic mitigation signals using controlled exposure behavioural response studies. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 29(S1):157–177.

47. Fjälling, A., Wahlberg, M. and Westerberg, H. (2006). Acoustic harassment devices reduce seal interaction in the Baltic salmon-trap, net fishery. ICES Journal of Marine Science 63(9): 1751–175850 Kastelien et al 2015

48. Kastelein, R.A.,Horvers,M, Lean Helder-Hoek,L., Shirley Van de Voorde,S., Remment ter Hofstede,R., and Heidi van der Meij, H (2017). Behavioral Responses of Harbor Seals (Phoca vitulina) to FaunaGuard Seal Module Sounds at Two Background Noise Levels. Aquatic Mammals. 43(4), 347-363, DOI 10.1578/AM.43.4.2017.347

49. Hahad, O., Prochaska, J.H., Daiber, A. & Muenzel, T. (2019). Environmental noise-induced effects on stress hormones, oxidative stress, and vascular dysfunction: Key factors in the relationship between cerebrocardiovascular and psychological disorders. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2019: 4623109. doi: 10.1155/2019/4623109

50. Graham, I. M., Harris, R. N., Denny, B., Fowden, D., and Pullan, D. 2009. Testing the effectiveness of an acoustic deterrent device for excluding seals from Atlantic salmon rivers in Scotland. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 860–864

51. Quick, N., Middlemas, S.J. and Armstrong, J.D. (2004). A survey of antipredator controls at marine salmon farms in Scotland. Aquaculture 230: 169-180

52. Götz, T. and Janik, V.M. (2011). Repeated elicitation of the acoustic startle reflex leads to sensitisation in subsequent avoidance behaviour and induces fear conditioning. BMC Neuroscience 2011, 12:30

53. Götz, T. and Janik, V.M. (2015). Target-specific acoustic predator deterrence in the marine environment. Animal Conservation 18 (2015) 102–111

54. Götz, T. and Janik, V.M. (2016). Non‐lethal management of carnivore predation: Long‐term tests with a startle reflex‐based deterrence system on a fish farm. Animal Conservation 19(3): 212-221.