Hill, Upland and Crofting Farmer-led Group: climate change evidence
A summary of existing evidence around Hill, Upland and Crofting (HUC) farming, including greenhouse gas emissions produced by the Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS) division.
Annex E - Productivity Measures – long list
Measure |
Logic behind intervention |
Potential barriers |
Feasibility in Scotland |
---|---|---|---|
Farm advisory service |
Studies have found high rates of return on public investment in applied advice. |
|
Existing in the SRDP - could be extended |
Farmer discussion groups |
Studies have found high rates of return on public investment in applied advice. |
Lack of strong evidence; depends on method and context. |
Can be encouraged |
Support for farmer learning |
Support for new entrants and for continued professional development likely to increase adoption of new technologies and management practices. |
Low turnover in farming. |
Can be implemented |
Agriculture education |
Apprenticeships, college and university courses have improved the level of specialist knowledge among farmers in other countries. |
Low turnover in farming. |
Can be implemented |
Required qualifications |
Some countries have created "license to farm" to ensure continuous improvement of current farming systems, including environmental goals. |
May be politically unpopular. |
Can be implemented |
Support for Research and Development |
Research suggests that reduction of government support for R&D in the 1980s had a negative impact on productivity. |
Must be strategic, targeted, and adopted by farmers. |
Can be implemented |
Demonstration farms |
Some evidence to support that farmers who attend improve practice on their own farms. |
Unclear how it would impact farmers at scale. |
Relatively untested |
Smart farms |
Have been used in Australia to implement cutting edge technologies. |
Potential high costs. |
None existing in Scotland |
Monitor farms |
Evaluation suggests the model has been effective in improving farming performance and enterprise among active participants. |
Potential high costs. |
Existing - could be extended |
Measure |
Logic behind intervention |
Potential barriers |
Feasibility in Scotland |
---|---|---|---|
Reduction in direct support |
Most studies find a negative relationship between subsidies and productivity. May lead to significant restructuring in agriculture, particularly for smaller/more vulnerable farms. |
Likely to have negative political impacts; may lead to further "middling out". |
Can be implemented; may not be feasible due to Scottish agricultural context |
Capital grants or loans |
Studies find both positive and negative impacts on productivity: increased ability to innovate/develop business; low risk and potential crowding out. Loans may be more effective due to requirement to pay back. |
May not be WTO eligible; may lead to overcapitalisation. |
Can be implemented; limited by WTO rules |
Support for new entrants |
Younger entrants may have more innovative approaches to business, and may have stronger ICT and business planning skills. |
Lack of retirement housing; lack of long leases for farmland. |
Existing in the SRDP - could be extended |
Support for exit |
There are barriers to succession, meaning less productive management can continue longer than in other industries. |
Lack of retirement housing; lack of business planning and succession. |
Can be implemented |
Changing tax incentives |
Evidence from Ireland suggests that tax incentives for longer tenancies on agricultural land may increase productivity. |
Potential high costs, both financial and administrative. |
Can be implemented |
Measure |
Logic behind intervention |
Potential barriers |
Feasibility in Scotland |
---|---|---|---|
Precision Agricultural Techniques |
Evidence suggests some PATs can reduce fuel use and management time; there is a training requirement for farmers. |
High initial costs; high training requirement; lack of take-up by farmers. |
Needs wider adoption |
Nutrient management and soil nutrient mapping |
Promising in increasing yield and additional benefits in managing GHG emissions |
Lack of take-up by farmers. |
Needs wider adoption |
Improved soil management |
For example, nutrient management and mapping; reduced cultivations to increase soil quality. |
Lack of take-up by farmers. |
Needs wider adoption |
Robotic Milkers |
More effective for larger herds and potential for growth; there is a training requirement. |
Lack of take-up by farmers. |
Can be encouraged |
EID |
Appears to give significant savings in labour use. |
High initial costs; lack of take-up by farmers. |
Needs wider adoption |
EBVs; pedigree recording |
Studies suggest EBVs can increase profitability of livestock farms. |
High initial costs; lack of take-up by farmers. |
Needs wider adoption |
Changing cereal yields and varietal uptake |
Improved crop yields have not been consistent across Scottish farms; it is not clear why this is so. |
Lack of take-up by farmers. |
Further research required |
Measure |
Logic behind intervention |
Potential barriers |
Feasibility in Scotland |
---|---|---|---|
Precision livestock farming |
Targeted precision livestock farming has potential to increase net margins per animal. |
High initial costs; lack of take-up by farmers. |
Needs wider adoption |
Changing business size |
Large farms tend to be more efficient and better adopters of new technology. |
Politically unpopular "middling out" |
Can be encouraged |
Collaborative farming agreements |
May be of particular benefit to new entrants, through increased availability of land. |
Existing - could be extended |
|
Disease control and eradication |
Reduces loss and improves productivity. |
Existing - could be extended |
|
Risk management |
Investment in productivity should be accompanied by steps to manage and reduce risk. |
Could reduce incentive to innovate. |
Can be implemented |
Changing the input-output mix |
Switching from specialised farms to more mixed operations may offer opportunities for recycling of inputs, and best use of land. |
High training requirement for farmers. |
Can be encouraged |
Widen the range of planted crops |
A wider range of crops could diffuse the intensity of work and machinery requirements over the course of the year. |
High training requirement for farmers. |
Further research required |
Contact
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback