Reusable nappies: research

Provides commentary on a range of motivations and barriers associated with reusable nappies and makes a number of recommendations to encourage increased uptake among families in Scotland.


7 References

Abrams, K. M., Wang, Z., Song, Y. J., & Galindo-Gonzalez, S. (2015). Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313519733

Arnold, M., Wahlström, M., Gilli, R., Nelen, D., & Colgan, S. (2023). Headache fractions in mixed muncipal waste. European Environment Agency.

Askins, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2005). Sustainable Waste Management Project: Promotion of cloth nappy use in Durham. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/99221/1/99221.pdf

Barreca, J. (2023). Diaper Need: It’s Time for a Change in Practice and Policy. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 02711214231209197. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214231209197

Buckingham, S., & Kulcur, R. (2009). Gendered Geographies of Environmental Injustice. Antipode, 41(4), 659–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00693.x

Copello, L. (2021). Shit got real! It’s time to clear out plastic and chemicals from nappies, not the poo. Policy Paper. Zero Waste Europe.

Daae, J., & Boks, C. (2015). Opportunities and challenges for addressing variations in the use phase with LCA and Design for Sustainable Behaviour. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 8(3), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2015.1010630

Defra. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable and Reusable Nappies in the UK 2023.

Delgadillo, E., Reyes, T., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2021). Towards territorial product-service systems: A framework linking resources, networks and value creation. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 28, 1297–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.08.003

Environment Agency. (2005a). Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable and Reusable Nappies in the UK.

Environment Agency. (2005b). Time to change? A study of how parents and carers use disposable and reusable nappies.

Environment Agency. (2008). An updated lifecycle assessment study for disposable and reusable nappies.

Geist, B. K., & Bammer-Zimmer, R. (2023). Effects of Early Toilet Training and Elimination Communication With Respect to Diaper Types. CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 62(8), 901–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/00099228221145268

Gibson, C., Farbotko, C., Gill, N., Head, L., & Waitt, G. (2013). Household Sustainability: Challenges and Dilemmas in Everyday Life. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017). How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes. Field Methods, 29(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16639015

Hoffmann, B. S., de Simone Morais, J., & Teodoro, P. F. (2020). Life cycle assessment of innovative circular business models for modern cloth diapers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, 119364.

Husaini, I. G., Garg, A., Kim, K. H., Marchant, J., Pollard, S. J. T., & Smith, R. (2007). European household waste management schemes: Their effectiveness and applicability in England. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 51(1), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.09.009

Inverclyde council, & Barnes, A. (2009). Inverclyde council: Real Nappy Promotion.

Kok, M. (2018). From disposable to washable: A case study about the most important barriers for consumers to use washable baby diapers [Master Thesis]. https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/40999

Masson, T., Jugert, P., & Fritsche, I. (2016). Collective self-fulfilling prophecies: Group identification biases perceptions of environmental group norms among high identifiers. Social Influence, 11(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2016.1216890

Miller, J., Bennett, C., & Cumming, G. (2011). Potentially changing health behaviour using nappy ‘nudges’. British Journal of Midwifery, 19(4), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2011.19.4.246

Ng, F. S.-F., Muthu, S. S., Li, Y., & Hui, P. C.-L. (2013). A Critical Review on Life Cycle Assessment Studies of Diapers. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 43(16), 1795–1822. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2012.671746

North Ayrshire Council. (n.d.). Reducing Plastic across North Ayrshire Council and Communities.

O’BRIEN, K., Olive, R., Hsu, Y.-C., Morris, L., Bell, R., & Kendall, N. (2009). Life cycle assessment: Reusable and disposable nappies in Australia. Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. https://www.ecorisparmiare.it/blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/44777470.pdf

Pendry, L. F., Mewse, A. J., & Burgoyne, C. B. (2012). Environmentally friendly parenting: Are cloth nappies a step too far? Young Consumers, 13(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/17473611211203902

Plotka-Wasylka, J., Makos-Chelstowska, P., Kurowska-Susdorf, A., Trevino, M. J. S., Guzman, S. Z., Mostafa, H., & Cordella, M. (2022). End-of-life management of single-use baby diapers: Analysis of technical, health and environment aspects. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155339

Randles, J. (2021). “Willing to Do Anything for My Kids”: Inventive Mothering, Diapers, and the Inequalities of Carework. American Sociological Review, 86(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420977480

Randles, J. (2022). ‘Why Don’t They Just Use Cloth?’ Gender Policy Vacuums and the Inequalities of Diapering. GENDER & SOCIETY, 36(2), 214–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211067966

Renkert, S. R., & Filippone, R. (2023). THE CAREWORK OF CLOTH DIAPERING : OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR MITIGATING DIAPER NEED. HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 82(2), 142–152.

Sadler, L. S., Condon, E. M., Deng, S. Z., Ordway, M. R., Marchesseault, C., Miller, A., Alfano, J. S., & Weir, A. M. (2018). A diaper bank and home visiting partnership: Initial exploration of research and policy questions. Public Health Nursing, 35(2), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12378

Salhofer, S., Obersteiner, G., Schneider, F., & Lebersorger, S. (2008). Potentials for the prevention of municipal solid waste. Waste Management, 28(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.026

Sandison, F., & Yeluripati, J. (2024). Life cycle assessment of Scottish vertical farming systems. Deliverable 1.3.1: Exploring the Scottish Context. For project B1-6 Monitoring the enviornmental impact of controlled environment agriculture. The James Hutton Institute.

Sandison, F., Yeluripati, J., & Stewart, D. (2023). Does green vertical farming offer a sustainable alternative to conventional methods of production?: A case study from Scotland. Food and Energy Security, 12(2), e438. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.438

Scottish Government. (2017a). Baby Box Deveopment Research.

Scottish Government. (2017b). Scotland’s Baby Box- parents’ views on contents.

Scottish Government. (2017c). Scotland’s Baby Box Pilot Research.

Scottish Government, Bardsley, D., Eunson, J., Ormston, R., Pollok, M., & Warren, R. (2021). Baby Box Evaluation.

Sharp, V., Giorgi, S., & Wilson, D. C. (2010). Delivery and impact of household waste prevention intervention campaigns (at the local level). WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 28(3), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X10361507

Short, T., & Harvey, J. (2008). Lightbulbs and nappies: Sustainable development and customer perceptions. International Journal of Sustainable Design, 1(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSDES.2008.017054

Siemensma, M., & Hunter, T. (2007). Putting nappies to the test. ReNew: Technology for a Sustainable Future, 101, 20–23.

Sparkman, G., & Walton, G. M. (2017). Dynamic Norms Promote Sustainable Behavior, Even if It Is Counternormative. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719950

Thomas, J., Newman, M., & Oliver, S. (2013). Rapid evidence assessments of research to inform social policy: Taking stock and moving forward. Evidence and Policy, 9(1), 5–27.

Thompson, S., Michaelson, J., Abdallah, S., Johnson, V., Morris, D., Riley, K., & Simms, A. (2011). ’Moments of Change’as opportunities for influencing behaviour. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/43453/

United Nations Environment Programme, Notten, P., Gower, A., & Lewis, Y. (2021). Single-use nappies and their alternatives- Recommendations from Life Cycle Assessments.

Uzzell, D., & Leach, R. (2003). The Implementation and Evaluation of Cotton Nappy Provision at East Surrey Hospital Maternity Unit. University of Surrey.

Velasco Perez, M., Sotelo Navarro, P. X., Vazquez Morillas, A., Espinosa Valdemar, R. M., & Hermoso Lopez Araiza, J. P. (2021). Waste management and environmental impact of absorbent hygiene products: A review. Waste Management & Research, 39(6), 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20954271

Warner, C., Philips, P., & Hill, K. M. (2018). The ‘Real Nappies for London’Scheme-waste prevention and wider social benefits-2012-2017. 33rd International Conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Charles-Warner-2/publication/322487171_The_'Real_Nappies_for_London'_Scheme_-_Waste_Prevention_and_Wider_Social_Benefits_-_2012-2017/links/5a6f6754458515015e615e9a/The-Real-Nappies-for-London-Scheme-Waste-Prevention-and-Wider-Social-Benefits-2012-2017.pdf

Warner, C., Vick, H., Phillips, P., & Lappage, A. (2015). The ‘Real Nappies for London’ Scheme 2007-2012: Key Findings to Drive a Future Waste Prevention Agenda. Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management, 41(1), 28–40.

Warner, C., Vick, H., Walker, A., & Hill, K. (2017). Contribution of ‘Real Nappies for London’ to local authority waste prevention—2012-2016. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-WASTE AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 170(3–4), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.17.00028

Watson, N., Benetti, S., & Beech, S. E. (2023). Time for a Nappy Change: Beliefs and attitudes towards modern cloth nappies. Environ 2023: 33rd Irish Environmental Researchers Colloquium" Evidence And Plans Towards Transitions To A Sustainable Future", 45. https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/en/publications/time-for-a-nappy-change-beliefs-and-attitudes-towards-modern-clot

Wilks, S. L. (2004). Environmental Knowledges: A Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Knowledge Bases (SSRN Scholarly Paper 2258211). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2258211

Contact

Email: socialresearch@scotland.gsi.gov.uk

Back to top