Scotland's Climate Assembly - process, impact and assembly member experience: research report
Mixed methods research into Scotland’s Climate Assembly, including process, impact and assembly member experience.
Appendix 3 – Acronyms and References
Acronyms
BEIS
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
CAoS
Citizens Assembly of Scotland
CAST
Centre for Climate Change and Social Transformations
CATI
Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing
CAUK
Climate Assembly UK
COP26
UN Climate Change Conference
Defra
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
ERS
Emotional Resonance Score
EU
European Union
FE news
Further Education news
IRT
Implicit Response Testing
JTC
Just Transition Commission
NPF4
Draft National Planning Framework 4
OECD
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
RSPB
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
SCA
Scotland’s Climate Assembly
SG
Scottish Government
SMART
Specific, measureable, achievable, relevant, time-bound
SNP
Scottish National Party
SPICe
Scottish Parliament Information Centre
SPSS
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
STV
Scottish Television
TFN
Third Force News
WE1
Weekend 1
WE2
Weekend 2
WE3
Weekend 3
WE4
Weekend 4
WE5
Weekend 5
WE6
Weekend 6
WE7
Weekend 7
WE8
Weekend 8
XR
Extinction Rebellion
References
Andrews, N. (2022). The emotional experience of members of Scotland’s Citizens’ Assembly on climate change. Frontiers in Climate: Climate Risk Management. IN review.
Capstick, S., Demski, C., Cherry, C., Verfuerth, C. and Steentjes, K. (2020). Climate Change Citizens’ Assemblies. CAST Briefing Paper 03. https://cast.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/CAST-Briefing-03-Climate-Change-Citizens-Assemblies.pdf
Clarke, C., Braun., V. and Hayfield, N. (2015). Thematic Analysis. In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. Accessed on 10.02.2022. Available at: [https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=lv0aCAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA222&dq=braun+and+clarke+thematic+analysis&ots=eOJJhAilRA&sig=k90cgMtUNpSszzL4ajk_1cHTbm4#v=onepage&q&f=false]
Curato, N., Farrell , D. M., Geissel , B., Grönlund, K., Mockler, P., Pilet, J-B., Renwick, A., Rose, J., Setälä, M., & Suiter, J. (2021). Deliberative Mini-Publics: Core Design Features. Bristol University Press.
Deci E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2000), “The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behaviour”, Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 227-268.
Elstub, S., Escobar, O., Henderson, A., Thorne, T., Bland, N. & Bowes, E. (2022). Research Report on the Citizens’ Assembly of Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research. https://www.gov.scot/isbn/9781802018943
Elstub, S., Farrell, D. M., Carrick, J., and Mockler, P. (2021). Evaluation of Climate Assembly UK, Newcastle: Newcastle University., Available: https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/get-involved2/climate-assembly-uk/evaluation-of-climate-assembly-uk.pdf
Escobar, O. & Thompson, A. (2019) 'Mixed methods research in democratic innovation'. In Elstub, S. & Escobar, O. (eds.) The Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Escobar, O. (2011). Public dialogue and deliberation: a communication perspective for public engagement. UK Beacons for Public Engagement.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Penguin Random House UK.
Nisbet, M.C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12-23.
OECD (2021). Eight ways to institutionalise deliberative democracy. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 12. OECD Publishing https://doi.org/10.1787/4fcf1da5-en
Osbaldiston, R. & Sheldon, K.M. (2003) Promoting internalized motivation for environmentally responsible behavior: A prospective study of environmental goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, pp.349-357.
Pelletier, L.G. (2002) A motivational analysis of self-determination for pro-environmental behaviors. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan, eds. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester NY: University Of Rochester Press. pp. 205-232.
Roberts, J.J., Lightbody, R., Low, R., & Elstub, S. (2020) ‘Deliberating Evidence in Deliberation: Scrutinising the role of witness and evidence in mini-publics, a case study’, Policy Sciences, 53(1): 3-32.
Rosenberg, S.W. (2014) ‘Citizen competence and the psychology of deliberation’, in Elstub, S. & McLaverty, P. (eds.) Deliberative Democracy: Issues and Cases, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Shaw, C., Wang, S., and Latter, B. (2021). How does the framing of climate change affect the conclusions reached in climate assemblies? KNOCA Briefing No.1. https://knoca.eu/the-framing-of-climate-change-within-climate-assemblies/
Steenbergen, M.R., Bächtiger, A.M., Sporndli, M. & Steiner, J. (2003). Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index. Comparative European Politics, 1(1), pp. 21-48.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel; W. G. Austin (eds.). Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall. pp. 7–24.
Contact
Email: socialresearch@gov.scot
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback