Scotland's Digital Future: Report on the current landscape for Data Hosting and Data Centres in the Scottish Public Sector
This report sets out the findings of a review of the public sector data centre landscape. The landscape review was the first phase of the project to deliver the data hosting and data centre strategy published in April 2014. The findings in this report ref
Section 2: Public Sector - Survey results
Introduction
The survey, which was published via Survey Monkey, provided updated information from the surveys carried out in 2010 which informed the McClelland review on public sector ownership. The aims were to:
- investigate organisations' views for sharing facilities
- understand any perceived barriers to sharing
- understand intentions in respect of use of the cloud
Key overall stats are below and individual sectoral positions are described in more detail in Annex D.
The general observation is that organisations have different approaches to meeting similar requirements.
The survey confirmed that, currently, Scottish public sector organisations house ICT systems in a number of locations each with a variety of facilities. These include mainframe and midrange platforms located in traditional purpose built data centre environments in both the public and private sectors, as well as other servers and communications equipment in less controlled or secure locations, including some office environments.
Sector responses to survey
sector | sent | received | %returned | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Central Government | 55 | 35 | 63.64% | |
Local Government | 32 | 17 | 53.13% | |
Fire Service* | 1 | 1 | 100.00% | |
Police Service* | 1 | 1 | 100.00% | |
Health* | 1 | 1 | 100.00% | |
FE/ HE | Universities | 19 | 12 | 63.16% |
Colleges** | 42 | 1 |
* It should be noted that Fire/Police/Health responded out with the survey with an overview of their position.
** The 1 College response has not been included in the analysis.
Current situation on public sector owned data centres
data centre usage
Please describe all your data centre(s) and tier rating
Primary Data Centre | Secondary Data Centre | Third Data Centre | |
---|---|---|---|
organisations who own their own data centres | 78.5% | 23% | 9% |
Tier rating of DC - One | 10% | 9.5% | 25% |
Tier rating of DC - two | 49% | 48.5% | 0 |
Tier rating of DC - three | 28% | 29% | 37.5% |
Tier rating of DC - four | 2% | 0 | 0 |
Tier rating of DC unknown | 11% | 13% | 37.5% |
of those who own their own data centres how many measures energy consumption. | 40% | 60% | 28% |
of those who measure energy consumption how many measures PUE | 19% | 33% | 0 |
PUE range rating | 1.4 - 2.6 | 1.6 - 1.9 | 0 |
The number of organisations who responded and used an alternative to owning their own data centres
Primary Data Centre | Secondary Data Centre | Third Data Centre | |
---|---|---|---|
organisations who used alternatives to owning their own data centres | 21.5% | 66% | 17% |
co-located in self-managed rack space from commercial supplier | 1.5% | 6% | 1.5% |
co-located in self-managed rack space with existing Public sector Organisation | 3% | 9% | 3% |
outsourced fully managed hosing service with commercial provider | 3% | 1.5% | 3% |
hosted cloud | 0 | 1.5% | 0 |
managed cloud computing | 1.5% | 1.5% | 0 |
disaster recovery site | 0 | 23% | 0 |
Something else | 9% | 10% | 0 |
Externally managed service
37% use an externally managed service for some of their data centre requirements with 80% of these providing 24/7 service . The main reasons for 24/7 service was around provision of web site functionality, business operations and were delivered as part of managed services.
Future plans for data centres
What are your plans for the delivery of data centre services in the future?
Not considering % | 0 - 2 years % | 3 - 4 years % | 5+ years % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
maintain and invest in existing data centre | 28 | 48 | 10 | 14 |
build new data centre onsite | 87 | 3 | 3 | 7 |
co-locate in self-managed rack space from commercial provider | 77 | 12 | 8 | 3 |
co-locate with existing Public sector organisation | 38 | 42 | 12 | 8 |
Outsource fully managed hosting service to commercial provider | 79 | 15 | 3 | 3 |
hosted cloud computing | 36 | 38 | 20 | 6 |
managed cloud computing | 43 | 31 | 18 | 8 |
disaster recovery site | 46 | 48 | 3 | 3 |
additional comments:
- open to consider opportunities but have very little data of a significant risk level to warrant expensive solutions
- we have already virtualised our servers, and consolidated our storage to enable mobility of our services and facilitate DR across our two main sites. Using internal cloud we are actively considering hosting options and taking up some services on external cloud, but currently bandwidth and costs mean this is not feasible. We expect SWAN to increase options available
How would you rate the following risks associated with sharing a data centre with another organisation?
Very low % | Low % | Acceptable % | High % | Very high % | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
security | 10 | 14 | 36 | 22 | 19 |
capacity performance | 10 | 15 | 41 | 25 | 9 |
scalability | 12 | 24 | 36 | 25 | 3 |
financial | 7 | 22 | 48 | 18 | 5 |
catastrophic loss | 5 | 24 | 48 | 12 | 12 |
culture change | 12 | 15 | 36 | 32 | 5 |
conflict of interest | 5 | 24 | 25 | 37 | 9 |
travel between locations | 5 | 12 | 61 | 19 | 3 |
additional comments:
- all very much dependant on the organisation's set-up, capabilities and the agreed SLA
- SWAN implementation should ease some of the concerns. Costs of hosting are a major concern
- the data within our core line of business application is currently assessed as IL4 in aggregate
- the risks depend on how the facility is managed
- very much depends on the organisation, the system and the data centre in question
- the communication links to our remote sites are very poor we would want to understand the impact to our network for a shared data centre
- all the answers depend on the organisation and their on-site setup, and the costs that would arise
How would you rate the following benefits associated with sharing a data centre with another organisation
Very low % | Low % | Acceptable % | High % | Very high % | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
lower carbon footprint | 2 | 12 | 27 | 49 | 10 |
disaster recovery | 3 | 2 | 32 | 48 | 15 |
more flexibility | 5 | 17 | 53 | 15 | 10 |
energy cost reduction | 2 | 15 | 27 | 44 | 12 |
value for money | 3 | 7 | 36 | 37 | 17 |
additional comments:
- benefits of shared services from applications, staff & systems
- cost/access/security/performance would be concerns
Would you consider hosting another data public sector organisations data centre in your facility? Yes/no
- 62.5% would consider hosting
Would you consider co-locating with another public sector organisation? Yes/no
- 81.5% would consider being hosted
additional comments:
- subject to acceptable commercial/service terms
- to move our services out completely would require significant assurances in terms of performance and convenience of access and recovery
- cost/performance/security are the major issues
- we would need to know in greater detail how any colocation agreement would operate and the facilities available before we could commit to using such services
- blocker for us co-locating to another public sector organisation is the need for us to have the hosting organisation accept commercial risk
- only the DR site would be co-located
- not our facility but would be happy to join discussions about jointly using our facilities
If you had to co-locate what is the maximum travel time between your location and a shared data centre that you would accept?
Acceptable % | |
---|---|
we cannot co-locate | 9 |
less than 30 minutes | 25 |
less than 1 hour | 55 |
less than 3 hours | 7 |
less than 5 hours | 7 |
additional comments:
- the distance is the dictating factor for DR
- if the co-location offered a fully managed service this would be less important
- to be honest I don't think there would be a huge amount of travelling between data centres
- would be looking for fully hosted solution - 5 hours is fine
- this would depend on the service level agreements internally and with the hosting organisation
- it's less about travel time and more about the potential latency issues on applications such as hosted desktops
- it should be irrelevant
- onsite support would help, if only to power on / off systems etc.
- most things are managed remotely now so do not always require access
Are you considering using the cloud? Yes/no
- 72% of organisations are considering using the cloud
What services are you considering putting in the cloud?
Yes % | No % | Don't know % | |
---|---|---|---|
business applications: ( CRM, email, etc.) | 68 | 15 | 17 |
ICT management: (backups, disaster recovery etc.) | 53 | 34 | 13 |
Infrastructure on-demand: (storage, network, server etc.) | 51 | 21 | 28 |
collaboration applications | 64 | 15 | 21 |
core business applications | 28 | 49 | 23 |
legacy applications | 13 | 57 | 30 |
research & development | 30 | 30 | 40 |
Please comment on any other services you are considering:
- already use a number of cloud based applications such as procurement, registration, web hosting etc. Have an open mind to cloud based services and look at each case on its merits
- please define "cloud"
- we already use cloud for some business applications. Considered when procuring new or replacement solutions
- security is a key factor so will need further guidance on this
- we have not fully explored as yet
What is stopping you moving data centre elements to the cloud?
yes | no | |
---|---|---|
lack of information | 47% | 53% |
uncertainty of data privacy | 87% | 13% |
existing infrastructure | 73% | 27% |
ability to meet service level agreements | 67% | 33% |
ease of transition | 80% | 20% |
security and control of data | 100% | 0 |
Overall additional comments
- procurement arrangements to support the use of public sector data centres need to be in place
- as a relatively small user of IT we have a very simple solution at the moment. Very willing to consider shared services with others
- consideration should be given to localised Dr / backup facilities shared between local public bodies e.g. Health Board and Local Authority to provide quick Business Continuity implementation
- case studies on a range of organisation sizes looking at cost/benefits would be useful in understanding what is available to reuse
- considering data needs of organisations with differing levels of reliance on that data is important - the high cost of resilient data centres often exceeds needs of an organisation
- we would need to know how communication links would affect the sharing of data centres. Most of our remote sites are on islands with poor connection speeds
- the survey questions don't really allow us to accurately reflect the current position. We are considering cloud and shared services but this is done in the context of selecting the correct approach for each specific requirement rather than a one size fits all approach
- the survey makes assumptions that serious consideration has been given to data centre strategy at a local level; in the absence of a national strategy or any incentives to change this is a flawed assumption
Key points from the survey
- most organisations have their own data centre to meet primary needs but 21% have found other solutions acceptable. The business cases that the latter group developed could have wider relevance
- most data centre owners expect further investment in their own data centre within the next two years
- other or additional options are being considered with a focus on public sector sharing and cloud solutions
- many organisations do not have a clear view of current costs or energy efficiency making their comparison of solutions problematic
- organisations require guidance on the use of cloud services
- any use of a shared public sector service requires a SLA with explicit allocation of liability for service failure
Contact
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback