Scotland's Forestry Strategy 2019-2029 draft: strategic environmental assessment (SEA)
Findings of the strategic environmental assessment (SEA) of the consultation draft of Scotland's Forestry Strategy 2019-2029.
4 SEA Methodology
4.1 Framework for assessing environmental effects
4.1.1 The draft Forestry Strategy has been assessed to ascertain the potential for significant environmental effects. The approach for predicting the environmental effects of the Strategy, the consideration of mitigation and enhancement measures and implementing a monitoring programme are described in this section.
4.1.2 A number of previous SEAs, particularly those pertaining to policies with implications for land use, set an appropriate framework for the present assessment. These assessments have already compiled a considerable amount of baseline data on forests and woodlands in Scotland, and have explored the possible environmental impacts that could result from changes to the sector. Recent examples include:
- 'Getting the best from our land - A land use strategy for Scotland 2016-2021'[79];
- 'Climate Change Plan: The Third Report on Policies and Proposals 2017-2032' and 'Scottish Energy Strategy: The Future of Energy in Scotland' (joint assessment)[80];
- 'Proposals for a Draft Climate Change Bill'[81];
- 'The Scottish Forestry Strategy 2006[82];
- SEA of Forest District Plans[83];
- SEA of the Regulations on Felling and Restocking[84].
4.1.3 Additional SEAs of relevance include those undertaken on National Planning Framework 3 and Scottish Planning Policy[85] (joint), 'A Consultation on 2020 Challenge for Scotland's Biodiversity'[86], and 'Climate Ready Scotland: Draft Scottish Climate Change Adaptation Programme'[87]. The assessment of these policy areas has largely been undertaken by the Scottish Government's SEA team, thereby providing the added benefit of good institutional knowledge of the broader policy area. Relevant findings have been collated from these previous assessments and used to guide this assessment.
Table 4: Scoping of environmental topics for the Forestry Strategy SEA
SEA Topic |
Rationale |
---|---|
Population and human health |
|
Soil |
|
Water |
|
Air |
|
Climatic factors |
|
Historic environment |
|
Material assets |
|
Landscape |
|
4.2 Development of Assessment Criteria
4.2.1 The Scoping Report set out environmentally-specific SEA objectives and associated indicator questions to help describe, analyse, and compare environmental effects. The SEA objectives cover all of the SEA topic areas that have been scoped into the assessment (see Table 4) and were derived from the key environmental topics, baseline data, and environmental protection objectives of relevance to the proposal.
4.2.2 The SEA objectives are separate from the Forestry Strategy objectives and priorities although they can influence each other and sometimes overlap. In line with the requirements of the 2005 Act, the SEA objectives cover the environmental topics set out in Schedule 3 of the 2005 Act, including the interrelationship between them.
4.2.3 The SEA objectives were identified based on a contextual analysis and then further refined following the Consultation Authorities responses to the scoping stage. The objectives were subject to the following distilling and tailoring process:
1. Identification of objectives based on issues identified in relation to forestry and the scoping of SEA topics;
2. The objectives were separated into primary objectives (SEA objectives) and secondary objectives or SEA criteria. The criteria were phrased as indicator questions to aid analysis (Table 6);
3. The assessment methodology was updated based on the scoping responses from the Consultation Authorities including clarity of read across from the issues/opportunities to the SEA objectives;
4. The objectives were refined to remove duplication;
5. Relevant PPS were signposted within the objectives.
4.2.4 In line with the 2005 Act the focus of the assessment is the key issues and potential for significant environmental effects (short, medium and long-term, permanent and temporary, positive and negative, secondary, cumulative and synergistic) associated with the proposals, ensuring this is framed in the context of current environmental obligations.
4.2.5 A Scoring System has been used to present information on the relative effects of the Forestry Strategy. This scoring system helps to form an opinion on how significant the impacts would be, with a magnitude ranging from:
Major Positive |
++ |
There will be a significant beneficial impact or an ongoing / continually improving environmental impact. |
---|---|---|
Positive |
+ |
There will be a minor cumulative or isolated positive environmental impact. |
Insignificant or no impacts |
o |
There will be neither a positive nor negative environmental impact. |
Negative |
- |
There will be a minor to moderate negative environmental impact. |
Major Negative |
-- |
There will be a significant adverse impact. |
4.2.6 Commentary is provided to justify the scoring with any uncertainties highlighted.
4.2.7 As shown in Table 5 the assessment was undertaken at a number of levels, running alongside the preparation of the Forestry Strategy.
Table 5: Framework used to assess the Forestry Strategy
Task |
Description |
---|---|
Stage 1: Initial baseline assessment |
Initial assessment of baseline data to establish context within which the Forestry Strategy is being implemented. |
Stage 2: Contextual review and identification of SEA objectives |
Undertaken in order to structure the assessment process. Scoping report prepared setting out key issues emerging from the initial assessment and defining methodology. |
Stage 3: Assessment of the priorities |
The assessment took a broad brush view of the objectives against the overarching SEA objectives in order to identify any potential significant environmental effects at a strategic level. This was used as a reference point for a subsequent level of analysis: a more detailed review of the priorities versus the SEA indicator questions. Outcomes from the assessment were considered during the development of the Strategy as they emerged. |
Stage 4: Assessment of new priorities as they emerged |
Provided a further insight into content of the Strategy as it developed through stakeholder engagement. |
Stage 5: Review of baseline data and adjustment of assessment |
Undertaken alongside the assessment to ensure sufficient data was gathered and used to inform judgements, incorporating additional data referred to during the course of the work. |
Stage 6: Synthesis of findings |
Review of findings from the assessment, identification of significant impacts, as well as measures for mitigation and enhancement. Overall conclusions drawn and Environmental Report prepared. Early and emerging findings have been taken into account by the Strategy as far as possible, during the final stages of preparation of the Strategy. |
Table 6: SEA Objectives and Indicators
Objective for each topic |
SEA Indicator Questions…Will the Forestry Strategy ….? |
---|---|
Population and human health |
|
Protect and enhance human health and well being |
|
Biodiversity, flora and fauna |
|
Protect and enhance both forested and non-forested (i.e. open-ground) ecosystems |
|
Support sustainable deer management |
|
Soil |
|
Protect high quality and sensitive soils |
|
Maintain and improve soil stability |
|
Air |
|
Protect and enhance air quality |
|
Water |
|
Protect and improve the water environment |
|
Climatic factors |
|
Reduce the causes and effects of climate change |
|
Material assets |
|
Promote the effective and sustainable use of forests and woodlands |
|
Safeguard and enhance existing natural and built resources |
|
Historic environment |
|
Safeguard the historic environment, including historic landscapes |
|
Landscape |
|
Protect and enhance the quality of landscapes and townscapes |
|
Contact
Email: Bob Frost
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback