Scotland's New National Park Appraisal Panel: final report
This report includes the Appraisal Panel’s advice to Ministers on the extent to which nominated areas meet each of the criteria for consideration for designation as new National Parks.
Loch Awe
Whilst smaller than the existing two National Parks, the area proposed (c. 92,000 ha) was deemed by the expert panel to be of an appropriate size for consideration as a National Park and the panel recognised the potential of the area in relation to the wider region. The panel noted the distinctive characteristics of the proposal including the relatively small population, the size and the remoteness of the proposed area. Nevertheless, the panel recognised that the overall rationale for the area’s coherence as a National Park was not clearly set out in the nomination.
The panel were aware of a limited number of natural heritage designations that merited outstanding national importance (SACs, SPAs, NNRs and SSSIs), however these were not explained or evidenced in the nomination. The panel recognised the very extensive national (and in some cases international) importance of the area’s cultural heritage, however there was a lack of detail and little recognition of key assets within the nomination.
In terms of how a National Park in Loch Awe could meet the special needs of the area, the nomination lacked information and evidence beyond a recognition of the need to enhance natural heritage, protect cultural features, develop renewable energy, promote nature-friendly farming and crofting and address issues such as affordable housing, out-migration and farming challenges.
The role of a National Park in promoting tourism and addressing visitor management issues was recognised, however there was limited evidence of key pressures, and the nomination did not address how National Park designation could provide solutions, nor did it acknowledge wider regional or national tourism strategies.
The nomination lacked examples and evidence of the wider strategic contribution to Scotland that a National Park in Loch Awe could make.
On local engagement, the nomination referenced some limited public consultation that has been undertaken (including with a local school), but it lacked detail and supporting evidence. The nomination did not include confirmation of support from the relevant local authority (Argyll and Bute).
The nomination lacked sufficient information and evidence to determine the level of support in the area for a prospective new National Park. The panel noted that further public and stakeholder engagement and consultation would need to be undertaken to determine the level of local support comprehensively.
Overall assessment for Loch Awe nomination:
Criterion |
Extent to which nomination meets the criterion |
---|---|
Outstanding national importance (natural heritage) |
Minimal/not addressed |
Outstanding national importance (cultural heritage) |
Partial |
Size, character and coherence |
Minimal/not addressed |
Meeting the special needs of the area (potential for protection and restoration of natural heritage) |
Minimal/not addressed |
Meeting the special needs of the area (potential for protection and enhancement of cultural heritage) |
Minimal/not addressed |
Meeting the special needs of the area (potential for sustainable use of natural resources) |
Minimal/not addressed |
Meeting the special needs of the area (potential to support economic and social development and wellbeing) |
Minimal/not addressed |
Strategic contribution (overall assessment) |
Minimal/not addressed |
Visitor management and tourism (potential to address visitor management pressures and enhance public enjoyment of the area) |
Minimal/not addressed |
Visitor management and tourism (potential to support sustainable tourism) |
Minimal/not addressed |
Local engagement |
Partial |
Local support |
Minimal/not addressed |
Contact
Email: NationalParks@gov.scot
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback