Scotland's People Annual Report: Results from 2013 Scottish Household Survey: Revised October 2015
A National Statistics publication for Scotland, providing reliable and up-to-date information on the composition, characteristics, behaviour and attitudes of Scottish households and adults across a number of topic areas including local government, neighbourhoods, health and transport.
4 Neighbourhoods and Communities
INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT
Improving the quality of life in Scotland's neighbourhoods and communities is one of the Government's five strategic objectives[48]. Help local communities to flourish, becoming stronger, safer places to live, offering improved opportunities and a better quality of life.
The Scottish Household Survey (SHS) is one of the sources of evidence that can be used to assess the national outcomes and targets associated with this overarching objective. It is used specifically to monitor one of the national indicators associated with the objective: ‘Improve people's perceptions of their neighbourhood’ and the outcome 'we live our lives safe from crime, disorder and danger' can draw directly on the survey findings presented in this chapter.
This chapter starts with an overview of public perceptions of the neighbourhoods in which they live. It then moves on to look at perceptions of the prevalence and experience of anti-social behaviour and perceptions of personal safety within neighbourhoods including experiences of discrimination and harassment. This chapter also investigates people’s confidence in the police to tackle and prevent crime, before finally looking at issues around how engaged people were with their community and how prepared they were for emergency situations.
Main Findings
- More than half (55.2 per cent) of adults rated their neighbourhood as a very good place to live in 2013. This continues the trend of consistently high ratings since the survey began in 1999 with over 90 per cent of adults rating their neighbourhood as a very or fairly good place to live.
- Adults living in rural areas of Scotland were more likely to say their neighbourhood is a very good place to live (73 per cent of those living in remote rural areas compared to 49 per cent of adults living in large urban areas). In addition, the proportion of adults rating their neighbourhood as very good increases as levels of deprivation decline.
- Overall, prevalence of different types of anti-social behaviour is relatively low, though the most commonly perceived problems were animal nuisance such as noise or dog fouling (31 per cent saying this is very or fairly common in their area) and rubbish or litter lying around (27 per cent).
- Around half of adults said they have not experienced any kind of neighbourhood problems (50 per cent), though this decreases to 42 per cent for those living in the 15 per cent most deprived areas of Scotland.
- Around four in five (84 per cent) adults said they feel very or fairly safe when walking alone in their neighbourhood after dark, with males (91 per cent) more likely to report feeling safe than females (76 per cent). Adults living in the 15 per cent most deprived areas of Scotland were less likely to say they feel very/fairly safe walking alone (70 per cent) compared to 86 per cent in the rest of Scotland.
- Less than one in ten (7 per cent) adults reported experiencing discrimination in Scotland in the last three years, a similar proportion of adults reported experiencing harassment (6 per cent). Older people were less likely to report having experienced both discrimination and harassment.
- Apart from ‘other’ reasons, the most common reasons people reported why they thought they experienced discrimination was ethnic group (31 per cent) followed by age (13 per cent). The most common reason cited that people believed they had experienced harassment was ethnic group (18 per cent).
- Over two-thirds (69 per cent) of people feel that the crime rate in their local area is about the same as it was two years ago. Of those who noted a change in crime rate, more people feel that there is now more crime in their local area as opposed to less crime (14 per cent versus 10 per cent).
- Around seven in ten adults were confident in the ability of their local police. Over three quarters (78 per cent) were confident in the ability of police to investigate incidents after they occur, while confidence in the ability of police to prevent crime and to catch criminals is slightly lower (66 per cent and 71 per cent, respectively).
- Over three quarters (78 per cent) of adults feel very or fairly strongly that they belong to their immediate neighbourhood. People from a white ethnic background were more likely to feel very strongly that they belong to their immediate neighbourhood compared to those from a minority ethnic group (37 per cent versus 23 per cent).
- Overall, adults in Scotland reported high levels of involvement with other people in the neighbourhood. Around three-quarters (77 per cent) of adults strongly agreed that they would offer help to neighbours in an emergency with similar levels of adults agreeing strongly that they could rely on friends/relatives to look after home (73 per cent) or rely on them for help (71 per cent).
NEIGHBOURHOODS
Overall ratings of neighbourhoods
Overall ratings of neighbourhoods have been consistently high since the Scottish Household Survey began in 1999. Over nine in ten adults said their neighbourhood is a fairly or very good place to live (Table 4.1). Since 2004 at least half of adults chose the highest rating very good, most recently 55.2 per cent in 2013 (unchanged from 2012). Around 5.6 per cent rated their neighbourhood as being fairly or very poor.
Table 4.1: Rating of neighbourhood as a place to live by year
Column percentages, 1999, 2004-2013 data
Adults | 1999 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Very/fairly good | 90.7 | 91.7 | 92.1 | 92.0 | 92.4 | 92.5 | 93.6 | 93.5 | 93.9 | 93.7 | 94.1 |
Very good | 49.4 | 50.3 | 50.7 | 51.1 | 51.7 | 53.1 | 55.0 | 55.4 | 55.9 | 55.2 | 55.2 |
Fairly good | 41.3 | 41.4 | 41.4 | 40.9 | 40.7 | 39.4 | 38.6 | 38.1 | 38.0 | 38.5 | 38.9 |
Fairly poor | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.1 | 5.2 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.1 |
Very poor | 3.4 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.5 |
No opinion | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
All | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 13,780 | 14,780 | 14,070 | 14,190 | 10,390 | 9,310 | 12,540 | 12,440 | 12,890 | 9,890 | 9,920 |
Table 4.2 shows how neighbourhood ratings vary by urban rural classification. People in rural areas (either accessible or remote), were most likely to rate their neighbourhood as a very good place to live, each around 70 per cent. In contrast, around half of people living in large urban and other urban areas rated their neighbourhood as a very good place to live (49 per cent and 51 per cent, respectively).
Table 4.2: Rating of neighbourhood as a place to live by Urban Rural Classification
Column percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Large urban areas | Other urban areas | Accessible small towns | Remote small towns | Accessible rural | Remote rural | Scotland |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Very good | 49 | 51 | 62 | 60 | 69 | 73 | 55 |
Fairly good | 43 | 42 | 33 | 37 | 29 | 25 | 39 |
Fairly poor | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Very poor | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
No opinion | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 3,300 | 3,010 | 910 | 610 | 1,060 | 1,030 | 9,920 |
Variation in neighbourhood ratings can also be seen by deprivation[49]. Figure 4.1 shows how the proportion of adults rating their neighbourhood as very good varies significantly as deprivation declines. The proportion of adults that rate their neighbourhood as a very good place to live increases as deprivation decreases - the overall Scotland figure (of 55 per cent) is significantly higher than the proportion in the bottom four deciles (which ranges from 27 per cent to 46 per cent). Only one in four adults (around 27 per cent) living in the 10 per cent most deprived areas of Scotland rate their neighbourhood as a very good place to live (though 81 per cent still rate their neighbourhood as either a fairly good or very good place to live overall).
Figure 4.1: Rating of neighbourhood as a place to live by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
2013 data, Adults (base: 9,920; minimum: 850)
Neighbourhood improvements
The final section under Neighbourhoods looks at perceptions of the extent to which neighbourhoods have changed in the preceding three years.
Table 4.3 shows that overall, two-thirds (65 per cent) of adults perceive things as staying the same. Adults living in the 15 per cent most deprived areas of Scotland were much less likely to say that things had stayed the same (49 per cent) compared to the rest of Scotland (67 per cent). The views of people in the most deprived areas were more polarised than those in the rest of Scotland; they were more likely to say that their neighbourhood has got better (24 per cent versus 13 per cent) and they were more likely to say that it has got worse (22 per cent versus 14 per cent).
Table 4.3: Perceptions of neighbourhood improvement in the past three years by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
Column percentages, 2013 data
Adults | 15% most deprived | Rest of Scotland | Scotland |
---|---|---|---|
Got much better | 6 | 2 | 3 |
Got a little better | 18 | 11 | 12 |
Stayed the same | 49 | 67 | 65 |
Got a little worse | 13 | 11 | 12 |
Got much worse | 9 | 3 | 4 |
No opinion | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Base | 1,450 | 8,470 | 9,920 |
ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR
The neighbourhood aspects, discussed above, draw on spontaneous suggestions by respondents of things that they like and dislike about their local areas. The following section now looks at public perceptions of some specific neighbourhood problems such as anti-social behaviour.
Previous research on SHS data showed that the perceived prevalence of anti-social behaviour in the local area was a key factor influencing respondents' overall perception of their neighbourhood as being rated poor[50]. Groupings of the nine neighbourhood problems that respondents were questioned about fall into four distinct groups:
General anti-social behaviour |
Neighbour problems |
Rubbish and fouling |
Vehicles |
---|---|---|---|
Vandalism/graffiti/damage to property |
Noisy neighbours/loud parties |
Rubbish or litter lying around |
Abandoned or burnt out vehicles |
Groups or individuals harassing others |
Neighbour disputes |
Animal nuisance such as noise or dog fouling |
|
Drug misuse or dealing |
|||
Rowdy behaviour |
Perceptions of neighbourhood problems
Table 4.4 presents perceptions of the nine neighbourhood problems, listed under the four anti-social behaviour groups identified above. The most prevalent neighbourhood problems fall into the ‘rubbish and fouling’ category with:
- 31 per cent identifying animal nuisance such as noise or dog fouling as a very or fairly common problem;
- 27 per cent identifying rubbish or litter lying around as a very or fairly common problem; and the most prevalent issues fall under the ‘general anti-social behaviour’
Until 2010, there had been a trend of gradual improvement in perceptions of neighbourhood problems, with 2010 representing the lowest measure of problems for all categories. Figures from 2012, however, showed a slight increase for many of the categories. The percentage of adults who perceive drug misuse or dealing to be very or fairly common had remained relatively stable since 2005 at or around 12 per cent. With the exception of animal nuisance, which has continued to rise, all categories have shown a slight decrease in 2013. The prevalence of vandalism, groups of individuals harassing others and rowdy behaviour is at the lowest level since 2005. Although the overall prevalence of these neighbourhood problems is relatively low, the extent to which they were experienced varies by key demographic and neighbourhood characteristics.
Table 4.4: Percentage of people saying a problem is very/fairly common in their neighbourhood
Percentages, 2005-2013 data
Adults | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General anti-social behaviour | |||||||||
Vandalism/graffiti/damage to property | 17 | 16 | 17 | 15 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 10 |
Groups or individual harassing others | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
Drug misuse or dealing | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 12 |
Rowdy behaviour | 17 | 16 | 17 | 17 | 16 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 13 |
Neighbour problems | |||||||||
Noisy neighbours/loud parties | 8 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 11 |
Neighbour disputes | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
Rubbish and fouling | |||||||||
Rubbish or litter lying around | 27 | 27 | 29 | 29 | 26 | 24 | 25 | 29 | 27 |
Animal nuisance such as noise or dog fouling | * | * | * | * | 24 | 23 | 26 | 30 | 31 |
Vehicles | |||||||||
Abandoned or burnt out vehicles | * | * | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Base | 14,070 | 14,190 | 10,390 | 9,310 | 11,400 | 11,140 | 11,280 | 9,890 | 9,920 |
Columns may add to more than 100 per cent since multiple responses were allowed. Some of the response categories are not comparable across all years.
Table 4.5 shows that, in more deprived areas, perceptions of the prevalence of neighbourhood problems is generally higher. This is true across all categorises of anti-social behaviour. The biggest contrast in perceptions of prevalence between the 10 per cent most deprived and the 10 per cent least deprived areas were seen in the general anti-social behaviour category and the rubbish and fouling category, for example:
- Drug misuse or dealing (33 per cent compared to 1 per cent)
- Rubbish or litter lying around (46 per cent compared to 16 per cent)
- Animal nuisance such as noise or dog fouling (47 per cent compared to 18 per cent).
This is broadly consistent with 2012 figures.
Table 4.5: Percentage of people saying a problem is very/fairly common in their neighbourhood by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation Deciles
Percentages, 2013 data
Adults | ←10% most deprived | 10% least deprived→ | Scotland | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ||
General anti-social behaviour | |||||||||||
Vandalism/graffiti/damage to property | 26 | 18 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
Groups or individual harassing others | 17 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
Drug misuse or dealing | 33 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 12 |
Rowdy behaviour | 31 | 22 | 17 | 14 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 13 |
Neighbour problems | |||||||||||
Noisy neighbours/loud parties | 25 | 16 | 13 | 15 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 11 |
Neighbour disputes | 13 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Rubbish and fouling | |||||||||||
Rubbish or litter lying around | 46 | 38 | 32 | 30 | 30 | 24 | 18 | 20 | 17 | 16 | 27 |
Animal nuisance such as noise or dog fouling | 47 | 40 | 37 | 35 | 32 | 29 | 25 | 27 | 23 | 18 | 31 |
Vehicles | |||||||||||
Abandoned or burnt out vehicles | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Base | 980 | 920 | 910 | 1,110 | 1,120 | 1,030 | 1,100 | 1,000 | 910 | 850 | 9,920 |
Percentages add up to more than 100 per cent as multiple responses could be given.
Table 4.6 shows that people living in social rented housing were most likely to perceive each of the neighbourhood problems as very or fairly common, compared to owner occupiers and private renters. For example, one quarter (25 per cent) of those living in the social rented sector perceive drug misuse or dealing to be a common problem, compared to 10 per cent in the private rented sector and 8 per cent for owner occupiers. Likewise, social tenants were more likely to be concerned by animal fouling (38 per cent) and rubbish (37 per cent) than private renters and owner occupiers. In part, these associations further emphasise the link between social rented housing and deprivation. Over half (55 per cent) of households in the 15 per cent most deprived areas were in the social rented sector, compared with 23 per cent in Scotland overall[51].
Table 4.6: Percentage of people saying a problem is very/fairly common in their neighbourhood by tenure of household
Percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Owner occupied | Social rented | Private rented | Other | All |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
General anti-social behaviour | |||||
Vandalism/graffiti/damage to property | 7 | 18 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
Groups or individual harassing others | 5 | 12 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
Drug misuse or dealing | 8 | 25 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Rowdy behaviour | 8 | 23 | 18 | 13 | 13 |
Neighbour problems | |||||
Noisy neighbours/loud parties | 6 | 20 | 17 | 7 | 11 |
Neighbour disputes | 4 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
Rubbish and fouling | |||||
Rubbish or litter lying around | 24 | 37 | 28 | 20 | 27 |
Animal nuisance such as noise or dog fouling | 31 | 38 | 23 | 23 | 31 |
Vehicles | |||||
Abandoned or burnt out vehicles | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Base | 6,250 | 2,300 | 1,160 | 210 | 9,920 |
Percentages add up to more than 100 per cent as multiple responses could be given.
Table 4.7 shows that perceptions of neighbourhood problems generally decline with age. For example, those aged 16 to 24 were five times as likely (20 per cent) to consider rowdy behaviour to be fairly or very common, compared to those over 75 (4 per cent).
Table 4.7: Percentage of people saying a problem is very/fairly common in their neighbourhood by age of respondent
Percentages, 2013 data
Adults | 16 to 24 | 25 to 34 | 35 to 44 | 45 to 59 | 60 to 74 | 75 plus | All |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General anti-social behaviour | |||||||
Vandalism/graffiti/damage to property | 12 | 14 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
Groups or individual harassing others | 9 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
Drug misuse or dealing | 13 | 16 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 5 | 12 |
Rowdy behaviour | 20 | 19 | 13 | 11 | 8 | 4 | 13 |
Neighbour problems | |||||||
Noisy neighbours/loud parties | 16 | 16 | 12 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 11 |
Neighbour disputes | 12 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
Rubbish and fouling | |||||||
Rubbish or litter lying around | 32 | 34 | 26 | 26 | 24 | 15 | 27 |
Animal nuisance such as noise or dog fouling | 29 | 34 | 36 | 31 | 30 | 23 | 31 |
Vehicles | |||||||
Abandoned or burnt out vehicles | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Base | 830 | 1,350 | 1,450 | 2,590 | 2,400 | 1,300 | 9,920 |
Percentages add up to more than 100 per cent as multiple responses could be given.
Table 4.8 shows that, in broad terms, urban residents were more likely to consider neighbourhood problems to be common, compared to those living in rural areas. Accessible rural and remote rural areas show the lowest levels of prevalence in each category of anti-social behaviour.
Individuals living in large urban areas were more concerned by general anti-social behaviour. For example, there is a broad range in perceptions of rowdy behaviour, which is highest in large urban areas (17 per cent) and lowest in remote rural areas (3 per cent). Likewise, perceptions of the prevalence of vandalism is highest in large urban areas (14 per cent) and lowest in accessible and remote rural areas (each 3 per cent). Around twice as many in remote small towns considered noisy neighbours to be a problem (13 per cent) than in accessible small towns (6 per cent).
Table 4.8: Percentage of people saying a problem is very/fairly common in their neighbourhood by Urban Rural classification
Percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Large urban areas | Other urban areas | Accessible small towns | Remote small towns | Accessible rural | Remote rural | Scotland |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General anti-social behaviour | |||||||
Vandalism/graffiti/damage to property | 14 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 10 |
Groups or individual harassing others | 8 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
Drug misuse or dealing | 15 | 13 | 11 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
Rowdy behaviour | 17 | 13 | 10 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 13 |
Neighbour problems | |||||||
Noisy neighbours/loud parties | 14 | 11 | 6 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 11 |
Neighbour disputes | 8 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
Rubbish and fouling | |||||||
Rubbish or litter lying around | 32 | 27 | 23 | 28 | 17 | 18 | 27 |
Animal nuisance such as noise or dog fouling | 35 | 31 | 29 | 31 | 25 | 24 | 31 |
Vehicles | |||||||
Abandoned or burnt out vehicles | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Base | 3,300 | 3,010 | 910 | 610 | 1,060 | 1,030 | 9,920 |
Percentages add up to more than 100 per cent as multiple responses could be given.
Personal Experience of Neighbourhood Problems
The previous section focused on perceptions of neighbourhood problems; this section will now consider personal experience of neighbourhood problems. Figure 4.2 compares the perception and actual experience of problems, highlighting the proportions of people who said that each problem is very or fairly common in their area, as well as the proportion that said they had experienced each problem in their neighbourhood in the previous year. The key thing to note is that, in most cases, perceptions of how common a problem is were higher than actual experience. For example, 12 per cent of respondents considered drug misuse or dealing to be a common problem, however, only 5 per cent had personally experienced this problem. Therefore, while some adults who said they perceive a particular anti-social behaviour to be common, they have not experienced it themselves.
Of course, it is not always necessary to have direct personal experience of some issues to know or perceive that they are a problem in an area. For example, in the case of vandalism, a person may not have experienced vandalism to their property, but may have seen property that has been vandalised in their neighbourhood. Furthermore, drug misuse or drug dealing may only involve a small number of individuals directly in a neighbourhood. However, the paraphernalia associated with drug misuse will be visible to people living in the area where it takes place, or those dealing in or using drugs may be known to local residents.
It is important to note, however, that experience is self-defined. For example, one respondent may say they have experienced drug dealing because they have seen it taking place, while another's experience may be of being offered drugs by a dealer.
Figure 4.2: Perceptions and experience of neighbourhood problems
2013 data, Adults (base: 9,920)
Table 4.9 to Table 4.11 present the proportions of people who said that they have experienced each of these problems by area deprivation, housing tenure and urban rural classification. Although there are exceptions, these figures are generally consistent with the patterns discussed in relation to perceptions of neighbourhood problems, with problems being experienced most by those living in the 15 per cent most deprived areas, in social housing and in urban areas.
Table 4.9: Experience of neighbourhood problems by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
Percentages, 2013 data
Adults | 15% most deprived | Rest of Scotland | Scotland |
---|---|---|---|
General anti-social behaviour | |||
Vandalism/graffiti/damage to property | 10 | 5 | 6 |
Groups or individual harassing others | 7 | 3 | 3 |
Drug misuse or dealing | 13 | 4 | 5 |
Rowdy behaviour | 15 | 9 | 10 |
Neighbour problems | |||
Noisy neighbours/loud parties | 15 | 9 | 10 |
Neighbour disputes | 7 | 5 | 5 |
Rubbish and fouling | |||
Rubbish or litter lying around | 24 | 21 | 21 |
Animal nuisance such as noise or dog fouling | 35 | 31 | 32 |
Vehicles | |||
Abandoned or burnt out vehicles | 2 | 1 | 1 |
None | 42 | 52 | 50 |
Base | 1,450 | 8,470 | 9,920 |
Percentages add up to more than 100 per cent as multiple responses could be given.
Table 4.10: Experience of neighbourhood problems by tenure of household
Percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Owner occupied | Social rented | Private rented | Other | All |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
General anti-social behaviour | |||||
Vandalism/graffiti/damage to property | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
Groups or individual harassing others | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
Drug misuse or dealing | 3 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
Rowdy behaviour | 8 | 13 | 16 | 11 | 10 |
Neighbour problems | |||||
Noisy neighbours/loud parties | 7 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 10 |
Neighbour disputes | 4 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
Rubbish and fouling | |||||
Rubbish or litter lying around | 19 | 26 | 24 | 20 | 21 |
Animal nuisance such as noise or dog fouling | 33 | 33 | 24 | 27 | 32 |
Vehicles | |||||
Abandoned or burnt out vehicles | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 |
None | 53 | 45 | 48 | 53 | 50 |
Base | 6,250 | 2,300 | 1,160 | 210 | 9,920 |
Percentages add up to more than 100 per cent as multiple responses could be given.
Table 4.11: Experience of neighbourhood problems by Urban Rural Classification
Percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Large urban areas | Other urban areas | Accessible small towns | Remote small towns | Accessible rural | Remote rural | Scotland |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General anti-social behaviour | |||||||
Vandalism/graffiti/damage to property | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
Groups or individual harassing others | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Drug misuse or dealing | 7 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
Rowdy behaviour | 12 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
Neighbour problems | |||||||
Noisy neighbours/loud parties | 13 | 11 | 6 | 15 | 3 | 4 | 10 |
Neighbour disputes | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
Rubbish and fouling | |||||||
Rubbish or litter lying around | 23 | 21 | 19 | 26 | 15 | 20 | 21 |
Animal nuisance such as noise or dog fouling | 32 | 32 | 31 | 41 | 29 | 27 | 32 |
Vehicles | |||||||
Abandoned or burnt out vehicles | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 |
None | 47 | 51 | 55 | 38 | 59 | 59 | 50 |
Base | 3,300 | 3,010 | 910 | 610 | 1,060 | 1,030 | 9,920 |
Percentages add up to more than 100 per cent as multiple responses could be given.
CRIME
Fear of Crime
This section first looks at two questions in the survey about fear of crime; one refers to "walking alone in the local neighbourhood after dark" and the second asks about safety "at home alone at night". The final part of this section investigates the prevalence of, and some of the reasons for, discrimination and harassment.
Over four-fifths of adults (84 per cent) felt very or fairly safe while walking alone in their neighbourhood after dark, and the vast majority (98 per cent) felt fairly or very safe when alone in their home at night (Table 4.12).
There is little variation by gender and age for people feeling safe in their home at night, although feeling safe when walking alone at night varies markedly by gender. Around three-quarters (76 per cent) of women said that they would feel fairly or very safe walking alone at night in their neighbourhood, compared to 91 per cent of men.
Perceptions of safety while walking alone at night increases from the 16 to 24 age category (82 per cent) to the 35 to 44 age category (89 per cent). Those aged 75 and over were less likely to say they felt very or fairly safe (72 per cent) compared to all adults.
Table 4.12: Perceptions of safety when walking alone in local neighbourhood and in their home alone at night by gender and age
Percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Male | Female | 16-24 | 25-34 | 35-44 | 45-59 | 60-74 | 75+ | All |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Walking alone | |||||||||
Very/Fairly safe | 91 | 76 | 82 | 84 | 89 | 85 | 81 | 72 | 84 |
Very/A bit unsafe | 8 | 22 | 17 | 15 | 11 | 14 | 16 | 23 | 15 |
Don't Know | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 4,330 | 5,160 | 820 | 1,340 | 1,430 | 2,540 | 2,280 | 1,080 | 9,490 |
At home | |||||||||
Very/Fairly safe | 99 | 96 | 96 | 97 | 97 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 |
Very/A bit unsafe | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Don't Know | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 4,450 | 5,470 | 830 | 1,350 | 1,450 | 2,590 | 2,400 | 1,300 | 9,920 |
Table 4.13 compares perceptions of safety in the 15 per cent most deprived areas with the rest of Scotland. People living in the 15 per cent most deprived areas were less likely to feel very or fairly safe walking alone at night (70 per cent) compared to people living in the rest of Scotland (86 per cent). The proportion of adults who said that they would feel unsafe is around twice as high in the 15 per cent deprived areas (28 per cent) than the rest of Scotland (13 per cent). There is less variation when looking at the proportion of adults that feel very fairly safe when at home, with nearly all adults reporting that they felt very or fairly safe.
Table 4.13: Perceptions of safety when walking alone in local neighbourhood and when home alone at night after dark by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
Percentages, 2013 data
Adults | 15% most deprived | Rest of Scotland | Scotland |
---|---|---|---|
Walking alone | |||
Very/Fairly safe | 70 | 86 | 84 |
Very/A bit unsafe | 28 | 13 | 15 |
Don't Know | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 1,380 | 8,110 | 9,490 |
At home | |||
Very/Fairly safe | 96 | 98 | 98 |
Very/A bit unsafe | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Don't Know | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 1,450 | 8,470 | 9,920 |
Having a long-standing physical or mental health problem appears to have an influence on feelings of safety. Those who identified as having a long-standing condition were less likely to say that they felt safe walking alone at night (76 per cent) than those who did not (86 per cent).
The impact of the condition on an adult’s ability to carry out everyday activities also had some bearing on feelings of safety when home alone and walking alone at night as 84 per cent of those who said that their condition had no impact on their ability to carry out everyday activities feeling safe walking alone in their neighbourhood which is significantly higher than the 68 per cent of those who said that their condition impacted on their abilities a lot.
Table 4.14: Perceptions of safety when walking alone in the neighbourhood and in their home alone at night by disability
Column percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Long-standing physical or mental health condition | Impact of condition on ability to carryout day-to-day activities | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | All | A lot | A little | Not at all | All | |
Walking alone | |||||||
Very/Fairly safe | 76 | 86 | 84 | 68 | 80 | 84 | 76 |
Very/A bit unsafe | 22 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 19 | 15 | 22 |
Don't Know | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 2,890 | 6,550 | 9,490 | 1,210 | 1,080 | 600 | 2,890 |
At home | |||||||
Very/Fairly safe | 96 | 98 | 98 | 94 | 98 | 98 | 96 |
Very/A bit unsafe | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Don't Know | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 3,210 | 6,660 | 9,920 | 1,450 | 1,140 | 620 | 3,210 |
Respondents were asked to rate their neighbourhood as a place to live from very poor to very good. There is a clear link between how individuals rated their neighbourhoods and how safe they feel (Table 4.15). Two-thirds (63 per cent) of adults that rated their neighbourhood as a very poor place to live felt very or a bit unsafe when walking alone while only 13 per cent of adults that rated their neighbourhood very or fairly good felt very or a bit unsafe. Similarly, only 2 per cent of adults that rated their neighbourhood very or fairly good said they felt very or bit unsafe at home while around one in five (18 per cent) of adults that rated their neighbourhood as very poor felt very or a bit unsafe at home.
Table 4.15: Perceptions of safety when walking alone in the neighbourhood and in their home alone at night by rating of neighbourhood as a place to live
Column percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Very/fairly good | Fairly poor | Very poor | No opinion | All |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Walking alone | |||||
Very/Fairly safe | 86 | 56 | 37 | * | 84 |
Very/A bit unsafe | 13 | 43 | 63 | * | 15 |
Don't Know | 1 | 1 | 0 | * | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 8,950 | 360 | 150 | 30 | 9,490 |
At home | |||||
Very/Fairly safe | 98 | 92 | 82 | * | 98 |
Very/A bit unsafe | 2 | 8 | 18 | * | 2 |
Don't Know | 0 | 0 | - | * | 0 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 9,360 | 380 | 150 | 30 | 9,920 |
Discrimination and Harassment
The SHS has asked respondents if, in the last three years, whilst in Scotland, they have experienced any kind of discrimination or harassment. Discrimination is defined as “occasions when you have felt you were treated unfairly or with less respect than other people because of your age, gender, ethnic group, religion, disability, sexual orientation, for sectarian or other reasons’. Further to this, harassment is defined as “occasions when you have felt intimidated, threatened or disturbed because of your age, gender, ethnic group, religion, disability, sexual orientation, for sectarian or other reasons".
Table 4.16 shows experience of discrimination and harassment by age and gender. Less than a tenth (7 per cent) of all adults reported experiencing discrimination in Scotland in the last three years, with men and women reporting similar levels of both discrimination and harassment. There is little variation by age, though older people (aged over 60) were less likely to report experience of discrimination and harassment, compared to all adults.
Table 4.16: Experience of discrimination and harassment by gender and age
Column percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Male | Female | 16-24 | 25-34 | 35-44 | 45-59 | 60-74 | 75+ | All |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Discrimination | |||||||||
Yes | 7 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
No | 93 | 94 | 92 | 91 | 91 | 93 | 96 | 98 | 93 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Harassment | |||||||||
Yes | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
No | 94 | 94 | 92 | 92 | 94 | 94 | 97 | 99 | 94 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 4,450 | 5,470 | 830 | 1,350 | 1,450 | 2,590 | 2,400 | 1,300 | 9,920 |
Table 4.17 shows that those who have experienced harassment or discrimination in Scotland in the last three years were more likely to say that they feel very or a bit unsafe walking at night in their local neighbourhood or being home alone at night. Around a third (35 per cent) of those who had experienced harassment said that they felt very or a bit unsafe walking alone at night in their neighbourhood, compared to 14 per cent of those who had not experienced harassment. Likewise, a quarter (25 per cent) of those who have experienced discrimination felt very or a bit unsafe walking alone, compared to 15 per cent of those who had not.
Table 4.17: Perceptions of safety when walking alone in local neighbourhood and in their home alone at night by experience of harassment and discrimination
Column percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Have experienced harassment | Have not experienced harassment | Have experienced discrimination | Have not experienced discrimination | All |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Walking alone | |||||
Very/Fairly safe | 63 | 85 | 73 | 84 | 84 |
Very/A bit unsafe | 35 | 14 | 25 | 15 | 15 |
Don't Know | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 540 | 8,950 | 650 | 8,840 | 9,490 |
At home | |||||
Very/Fairly safe | 89 | 98 | 94 | 98 | 98 |
Very/A bit unsafe | 11 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
Don't Know | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 550 | 9,360 | 660 | 9,250 | 9,920 |
Table 4.18 shows how the proportion of adults’ experiences of discrimination and harassment by sexual orientation, ethnicity, religion and whether the adult has a long term physical or mental health condition which has (or is expected to) last at least 12 months. For example, the table highlights that adults who identified themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual experienced higher levels of discrimination (28 per cent)[52], compared to all adults (7 per cent), however, as shown in Table 4.19 this is not necessarily due to their sexual orientation.
Table 4.18: Experiences of discrimination and harassment by sexual orientation, ethnicity, religion, and long term physical/mental health condition
Row percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Discrimination | Harassment | Base | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | Yes | No | ||
Sexual Orientation | |||||
Heterosexual/Straight | 7 | 93 | 6 | 94 | 9,760 |
Gay/Lesbian/Bisexual | 28 | 72 | 17 | 83 | 70 |
Ethnicity | |||||
White | 6 | 94 | 5 | 95 | 9,650 |
Other minority ethnic group | 24 | 76 | 14 | 86 | 270 |
Religion | |||||
None | 6 | 94 | 6 | 94 | 4,280 |
Church of Scotland | 4 | 96 | 4 | 96 | 3,120 |
Roman Catholic | 10 | 90 | 7 | 93 | 1,420 |
Other Christian | 10 | 90 | 6 | 94 | 840 |
Another religion | 21 | 79 | 14 | 86 | 250 |
Long term physical/mental health condition | |||||
Yes | 9 | 91 | 7 | 93 | 3,210 |
No | 6 | 94 | 5 | 95 | 6,660 |
All | 7 | 93 | 6 | 94 | 9,920 |
The discrimination/harassment reported in Table 4.18 may be due to other reasons and are not necessarily related to the equality characteristics presented. Reasons for discrimination/harassment are provided in Table 4.19
Adults who had experienced harassment and discrimination were asked why they thought they had experienced it. During the SHS interview, respondents are asked to provide spontaneous responses to why they thought they were discriminated against or harassed and where possible, the interviewer will code the response into one of the main categories provided in Table 4.19 (i.e. age, disability, gender, etc.). Due to the wide variety of reasons that adults can provide (and the fact that multiple reasons can be given) it is not possible to code every single type of response in advance, which has resulted in high levels of ‘other’ reasons being recorded.
Table 4.19 provides a breakdown of some of the reasons people gave for why they believe they were discriminated against or harassed. Around a third (31 per cent) of those who reported that they had been discriminated against said that the reason was their ethnic group followed by age (13 per cent). Table 4.19 also shows high proportions of adults citing ‘other’ reasons for why they were discriminated against and harassed (30 per cent and 50 per cent of adults, respectively).
While near equal proportions of women and men experience discrimination and harassment, Table 4.19 shows some differences between reasons given by males and females. Females were more likely to report having experienced discrimination because of their gender (12 per cent compared to 4 per cent of males) and harassment (13 per cent compared to 1 per cent of males).
Table 4.19: Reasons for discrimination or harassment by gender
Percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Discrimination | Harassment | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male | Female | All | Male | Female | All | |
Age | 10 | 15 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
Disability | 7 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Gender | 4 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 13 | 7 |
Ethnic group | 33 | 30 | 31 | 20 | 15 | 18 |
Religion | 9 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
Sexual orientation | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
Sectarian reasons | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
Other | 31 | 30 | 30 | 51 | 49 | 50 |
Don't know | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Refused | 0 | - | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Base | 320 | 340 | 660 | 240 | 310 | 550 |
Percentages add up to more than 100 per cent as multiple responses could be given.
Perception of Crime
This section looks at adults’ perceptions of how the crime rate in their local area has changed, compared to two years ago, and also investigates levels of confidence in the ability of the police.
Table 4.20 shows that two thirds (69 per cent) of people feel that the crime rate in their local area had remained about the same as two years ago (and that 78% of adults perceived the crime rate in their local area to have stayed the same of reduced in the past two years). Of those who noticed a change in the crime rate, more people felt that there was now more crime (14 per cent) rather than less crime (9 per cent).
The views of those in the 15 per cent most deprived areas differ from those in the rest of Scotland:
- over half (55 per cent) felt that crime had stayed the same, compared to 71 per cent in the rest of Scotland
- around one fifth (19 per cent) thought that crime had risen, compared to 13 per cent in the rest of Scotland
- around one fifth (19 per cent) thought that crime had fallen, compared to 7 per cent in the rest of Scotland
Table 4.20: Change in crime rate compared to two years ago by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
Column percentages, 2013 data
Adults | 15% most deprived | Rest of Scotland | All |
---|---|---|---|
A lot more | 8 | 2 | 3 |
A little more | 11 | 11 | 11 |
About the same | 55 | 71 | 69 |
A little less | 14 | 6 | 7 |
A lot less | 5 | 1 | 2 |
Don't know | 8 | 8 | 8 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 1,310 | 7,690 | 9,000 |
Table 4.21 shows the percentage of people who were either very or fairly confident in the ability of local police in tackling crime and how this varies by age and gender. Over three quarters (78 per cent) of adults were confident in the ability of the police to investigate incidents after they occur while 66 per cent were confident in the ability of the police to prevent crime. Although there is a generally high level of confidence in the police, there were some differences between age groups, with the highest levels of confidence in the over 75 age category.
Table 4.21: People saying they are very/fairly confident in the police by gender and age
Percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Male | Female | 16-24 | 25-34 | 35-44 | 45-59 | 60-74 | 75+ | All |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prevent crime | 64 | 69 | 70 | 66 | 65 | 63 | 66 | 74 | 66 |
Respond quickly to appropriate calls and information from public | 72 | 79 | 79 | 78 | 79 | 71 | 73 | 83 | 76 |
Deal with incidents as they occur | 73 | 80 | 80 | 78 | 79 | 72 | 75 | 82 | 77 |
Investigate incidents after they occur | 75 | 80 | 80 | 77 | 79 | 75 | 76 | 83 | 78 |
Solve crimes | 70 | 75 | 76 | 71 | 75 | 70 | 71 | 80 | 73 |
Catch criminals | 68 | 73 | 75 | 70 | 73 | 66 | 68 | 76 | 71 |
Base (minimum) | 3,770 | 4,510 | 700 | 1,130 | 1,250 | 2,230 | 1,990 | 980 | 8,280 |
The underlying calculations for these results do not include responses of ‘Don’t know’ so are completed on a different basis to the equivalent results in the Scottish Crime and Justice Survey.
Table 4.22 shows that confidence in the police is lower in the 15 per cent most deprived areas, compared to the rest of Scotland. In particular, 57 per cent of people in the most deprived areas were confident in the ability of the police to prevent crime, compared to 68 per cent in the rest of Scotland. Furthermore, those living in urban areas generally have less confidence in the police than those living in rural areas.
Table 4.22: Percentage of people saying they are very/fairly confident in the police by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation and Urban Rural Classification
Percentages, 2013 data
Adults | 15% most deprived | Rest of Scotland | Large urban areas | Other urban areas | Accessible small towns | Remote small towns | Accessible rural | Remote rural | Scotland |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prevent crime | 57 | 68 | 64 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 72 | 67 | 66 |
Respond quickly to appropriate calls and information from public | 71 | 77 | 77 | 75 | 73 | 81 | 77 | 74 | 76 |
Deal with incidents as they occur | 72 | 77 | 77 | 76 | 74 | 80 | 79 | 76 | 77 |
Investigate incidents after they occur | 73 | 79 | 77 | 78 | 77 | 78 | 80 | 80 | 78 |
Solve crimes | 66 | 74 | 71 | 72 | 74 | 73 | 78 | 74 | 73 |
Catch criminals | 64 | 72 | 68 | 70 | 72 | 73 | 75 | 75 | 71 |
Base (minimum) | 1,200 | 7,070 | 2,690 | 2,510 | 750 | 540 | 880 | 890 | 8,280 |
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND RESILIENCE
It is of interest to investigate how strongly individuals feel that they belong to their immediate neighbourhood. Table 4.23 shows that 78 per cent of adults felt very or fairly strongly that they belong to their immediate neighbourhood. Those from a white ethnic background were more likely to feel that they belong to their immediate neighbourhood (78 per cent), compared to those from a minority ethnic group (64 per cent).
Table 4.23: Strength of feeling of belonging to immediate neighbourhood by ethnicity
Column percentages, 2013 data
Adults | White | Other minority ethnic group | All |
---|---|---|---|
Very strongly | 37 | 23 | 37 |
Fairly strongly | 41 | 41 | 41 |
Not very strongly | 16 | 24 | 16 |
Not at all strongly | 6 | 9 | 6 |
Don't know | 1 | 3 | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 9,650 | 270 | 9,920 |
Table 4.24 indicates that, generally, the strength of feeling of belonging increased with age, with over half (57 per cent) of those aged 75 and over saying that they felt very strongly that they belong to their immediate community, compared to around a quarter (24 per cent) of 25 to 34 year olds.
Table 4.24: Strength of feeling of belonging to immediate neighbourhood by gender and age
Column percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Male | Female | 16-24 | 25-34 | 35-44 | 45-59 | 60-74 | 75+ | All |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Very strongly | 34 | 39 | 28 | 24 | 30 | 37 | 49 | 57 | 37 |
Fairly strongly | 42 | 39 | 42 | 42 | 45 | 41 | 38 | 31 | 41 |
Not very strongly | 17 | 16 | 21 | 24 | 18 | 15 | 9 | 9 | 16 |
Not at all strongly | 6 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
Don't know | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 4,450 | 5,470 | 830 | 1,350 | 1,450 | 2,590 | 2,400 | 1,300 | 9,920 |
Table 4.25 shows that those living in the 15 per cent most deprived areas were twice as likely to feel not at all strongly that they belong to their immediate neighbourhood (10 per cent) compared to the rest of Scotland (5 per cent).
Table 4.25: Strength of feeling of belonging to immediate neighbourhood by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
Column percentages, 2013 data
Adults | 15% most deprived | Rest of Scotland | All |
---|---|---|---|
Very strongly | 34 | 37 | 37 |
Fairly strongly | 36 | 41 | 41 |
Not very strongly | 19 | 16 | 16 |
Not at all strongly | 10 | 5 | 6 |
Don't know | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 1,450 | 8,470 | 9,920 |
Resilience
Ready Scotland is a suite of guidance which sets out a recommended approach to preparing for and dealing with emergencies[53]. From January 2012, the SHS incorporated three separate questions to help support the work of Ready Scotland.
Table 4.26 shows that the majority of adults agreed that they could rely on friends and relatives for help (91 per cent), to look after their home (91 per cent) or for advice and support (86 per cent). Almost all respondents (93 per cent) said that they would offer to help their neighbours in an emergency, with only 3 per cent disagreeing with this statement.
Table 4.26: Involvement with other people in the neighbourhood
Row percentages, 2013 data
Adults | Strongly agree | Tend to agree | Neither agree nor disagree | Tend to disagree | Strongly disagree | Base |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Could rely on friends/relatives in neighbourhood for help | 71 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 9,920 |
Could rely on friends/relatives in neighbourhood to look after home | 73 | 18 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9,920 |
Could turn to friends/relatives in neighbourhood for advice or support | 67 | 19 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 9,920 |
Would offer help to neighbours in an emergency | 77 | 17 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 9,920 |
Table 4.26 shows that 77 per cent of adults agree strongly that they would offer help to neighbours in an emergency. This provides strong evidence of a willingness and ability to help in an emergency, reinforcing the concept of helping neighbours and feeling of belonging to the community. Householders were also asked about how prepared they think the household is for periods of major disruption, such as a period of severe weather.
Table 4.27 shows that 3 per cent of households would not have enough food in their home to eat without going to the shops that same day. Over half (55 per cent) suggested that the food supplies in their home would last for six days or more.
Table 4.27: Number of days could last on food supplies in emergency by tenure of household
Column percentages, 2013 data
Households | Owner occupied | Social rented | Private rented | All |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
1-2 | 7 | 17 | 20 | 11 |
3-5 | 29 | 35 | 32 | 31 |
6-9 | 38 | 29 | 29 | 34 |
10-15 | 16 | 11 | 13 | 15 |
16-25 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
26 or more | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Mean | 8.1 | 6.0 | 6.1 | 7.3 |
Base | 2,220 | 810 | 400 | 3,510 |
There are differences when looking at tenure type, those in the private and social rental sectors said that their food supplies would last less time on average (6.1 and 6.0 days, respectively) than owner occupiers (8.1 days). Four per cent of owner occupiers said that their food supplies could last more than 26 days, higher than the proportion of households in the private rented sector (1 per cent).
Differences are also apparent when considering household income (Table 4.28), with those with a net annual household income of up to £10,000 feeling that their food supplies would not last as long on average (6.8 days), than those on higher incomes (around 7.3 days).
Table 4.28: Number of days could last on food supplies in emergency by net annual household income
Column percentages and mean, 2013 data
Households | Up to £10,000 | £10,001 - £20,000 | £20,001 - £30,000 | Over £30,000 | All |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
1-2 | 14 | 13 | 11 | 8 | 11 |
3-5 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 31 |
6-9 | 31 | 34 | 34 | 38 | 35 |
10-15 | 16 | 14 | 16 | 14 | 15 |
16-25 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
26 or more | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Mean | 6.8 | 7.3 | 7.5 | 7.3 | 7.3 |
Base | 450 | 1,170 | 750 | 1,020 | 3,390 |
It is recognised that emergencies can happen at any time, and that there are a few small steps that householders can take to prepare their family and home for the unexpected things that can cause disruption to daily lives.
Table 4.29 shows that almost a third (32 per cent) of households don’t have a first aid kit – a higher proportion for social tenants (45 per cent) and private tenants (42 per cent) than owner occupiers (24 per cent).
Most households (86 per cent) said that they could easily access important documents (such as birth certificates and insurance policies), within five minutes. Although 11 per cent said that, while they had the documents, they would not be able to locate them within five minutes. Overall, 3 per cent of households said that they did not have such documents. This was three times higher, however, in the 15 per cent most deprived areas of Scotland (6 per cent) compared to the rest of Scotland (2 per cent).
The proportion of those who do not have a first aid kit, torch or important documents increases as incomes declines (Table 4.30). For example, around three quarters (74 per cent) of households with an income of over £30,000 had a first aid kit, compared to around half (49 per cent) of those with an income of under £10,000.
Table 4.29: Availability of emergency response items in household by tenure of household and Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
Column percentages, 2013 data
Households | Owner occupied | Social rented | Private rented | 15% Most Deprived | Rest of Scotland | All |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First aid kit | ||||||
Yes | 69 | 46 | 50 | 52 | 63 | 61 |
No, could not locate within five minutes | 6 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
No, don't have | 24 | 45 | 42 | 42 | 30 | 32 |
Don't know | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Torch | ||||||
Yes | 88 | 65 | 72 | 70 | 83 | 81 |
No, could not locate within five minutes | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
No, don't have | 6 | 26 | 21 | 24 | 11 | 13 |
Don't know | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Important documents | ||||||
Yes | 88 | 80 | 87 | 80 | 87 | 86 |
No, could not locate within five minutes | 10 | 13 | 9 | 13 | 10 | 11 |
No, don't have | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 |
Don't know | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Battery-powered/Wind-up radio | ||||||
Yes | 37 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 33 | 32 |
No, could not locate within five minutes | 7 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 7 |
No, don't have | 55 | 70 | 67 | 71 | 58 | 60 |
Don't know | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 2,220 | 810 | 400 | 500 | 3,010 | 3,510 |
Table 4.30: Availability of emergency response items in household by net annual household income
Column percentages, 2013 data
Households | Up to £10,000 | £10,001-£20,000 | £20,001-£30,000 | Over £30,000 | All |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
First aid kit | |||||
Yes | 49 | 54 | 65 | 74 | 62 |
No, could not locate within five minutes | 9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
No, don't have | 41 | 39 | 30 | 21 | 32 |
Don't know | 2 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Torch | |||||
Yes | 75 | 74 | 86 | 88 | 81 |
No, could not locate within five minutes | 6 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
No, don't have | 17 | 18 | 9 | 5 | 12 |
Don't know | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Important documents | |||||
Yes | 80 | 84 | 87 | 90 | 86 |
No, could not locate within five minutes | 13 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 11 |
No, don't have | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Don't know | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Battery-powered/Wind-up radio | |||||
Yes | 32 | 29 | 34 | 36 | 32 |
No, could not locate within five minutes | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
No, don't have | 61 | 65 | 59 | 56 | 60 |
Don't know | 2 | 1 | - | 0 | 1 |
Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
Base | 450 | 1,170 | 750 | 1,020 | 3,390 |
Contact
Email: Andrew Craik
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback