We use cookies to collect anonymous data to help us improve your site browsing experience.

Click 'Accept all cookies' to agree to all cookies that collect anonymous data. To only allow the cookies that make the site work, click 'Use essential cookies only.' Visit 'Set cookie preferences' to control specific cookies.

Set cookie preferences

Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can change your cookie settings at any time.

Publication - Factsheet

Scottish Animal Welfare Commission - proximity of seals to farmed fish: response to Marine Scotland

Published
1 November 2022
Directorate
Agriculture and Rural Economy Directorate
Topic
Marine and fisheries

Response from the Scottish Animal Welfare Commission to Marine Scotland enquiry on 12 August 2022, regarding its opinion on the issues associated with the proximity of seals to farmed fish.

  1. Business Insider. Scottish salmon sales grow as exports return to pre-pandemic levels, 17 February 2022
  2. Scottish Government. Acoustic Deterrent Device (ADD) Use in the Aquaculture Sector. Parliamentary Report
  3. Northridge et al (2013). Investigations on Seal Depredation at Scottish Fish Farms. Report to Marine Scotland
  4. Coram, A., Ragnarsson, V., Thomas, L., Sparling, C.E. (2022). Use and efficacy of Acoustic Deterrent Devices (ADDs) in Aquaculture. Report to Scottish Government
  5. https://nature.scot
  6. Mooney, T.A., Yamato, M. and Branstetter, B.K. (2012). Hearing in cetaceans: From natural history to experimental biology. In: Advances in Marine Biology, Volume 63. Elsevier Ltd. 
  7. Kastelein, R.A., Gransier, R., Hoek, L. And Rambags, M. (2013). Hearing frequency thresholds of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) temporarily affected by a continuous 1.5 Hz tone. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134, 2286 (2013);
  8. Götz and Janik, (2013). Acoustic deterrent devices to prevent pinniped depredation: efficiency, conservation concerns and possible solutions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 492: 285-302.
  9. Brandt, M.J., Höschle, C., Diederichs, A., Betke, K., Matuschek, R., Witte, S. and Nehls, G., (2013). Far‐reaching effects of a seal scarer on harbour porpoises, Phocoena phocoena. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 23(2), pp.222-232
  10. Johnston, D. W. (2002). The effect of acoustic harassment devices on harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Biological Conservation 108: 113-118
  11. Morton, A. B. and Symonds, H. K. (2002). Displacement of Orcinus orca (L.) by high amplitude sound in British Columbia, Canada. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59: 71-80
  12. Olesiuk, P. F., Nichol, L.M., Sowden, M.J. and Ford, J.K.B. (2002). Effect of the sound generated by an acoustic harassment device on the relative abundance and distribution of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in Retreat Passage, British Columbia. Marine Mammal Science 18: 843-862
  13. Northridge, S.P., Gordon, J.G., Booth, C., Calderan, S., Cargill, A., Coram, A., Gillespie, D., Lonergan, M. and Webb, A. (2010). Assessment of the impacts and utility of acoustic deterrent devices. Final Report to the Scottish Aquaculture Research Forum, Project Code SARF044. 34 pp.
  14. Lepper, P.A., Gordon, J., Booth, C., Theobald, P., Robinson, S. P., Northridge, S. & Wang, L. (2014). Establishing the sensitivity of cetaceans and seals to acoustic deterrent devices in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 517.
  15. Olla, B.L., Davis, M. and Shreck, C.B. (1997) effects of simulated trawling on sablefish and walleye pollock: the role of light intensity, net velocity and towing duration. Fish Biology, 50, 1181-1194.
  16. Hjelmstedt, P., Brijs, J., Berg, C., Axelsson, M., Sandblom, E., Roques, J.A.C., Sundh, H., Sundell, K., Kiessling, A., and Gräns, A. (2012). Aquaculture 534: 736258
  17. Barcellos, L.J.G., Ritter, F., Kreutz, L.C., Quevedo, R.M., da Silva, L.B., Bedin, A.C., Finco, J. and Cericato, L. (2007). Whole-body cortisol increases after direct and visual contact with a predator in zebrafish, Danio rerio. Aquaculture 272: 774–778
  18. Xu, J-J., Fu, S-J. and Fu, C. (2019). Physiological and behavioral stress responses to predators are altered by prior predator experience in juvenile qingbo (Spinibarbus sinensis). Biology Open 8, bio041012. doi:10.1242/bio.041012
  19. Fu, C., Yi, L-C., Wu, W=P., Sun, C-X., Liu, R-N. and Fu, S-J. (2021). Qingbo, a common cyprinid fish, responds diversely in behavior and locomotion to predators with different hunting modes. Fish Physiol Biochem 47: 1415–1427. 
  20. Hammerschlag, N., Meyer, M., Seakamela, S.M., Kirkman, S., Fallows, C. and Creel, S. (2017) Physiological stress responses to natural variation in predation risk: evidence from white sharks and seals. Ecology, 98, 3199-2210. 
  21. Dwyer, C.M. (2004). How has the risk of predation shaped the behavioural responses of sheep to fear and distress? Animal Welfare 13(3): 269-281
  22. Van Liere, D., Dwyer, C., Jordan, D., Premik-Banič, A., Valenčič, A., Kompan, D. and Siard, N. (2013). Farm characteristics in Slovene wolf habitat related to attacks on sheep. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 144: 46-56.
  23. Dwyer, C.M. and Bornett, H.L.I. (2004) Chronic stress in sheep: assessment tools and their use in different management conditions. Animal Welfare 13(3): 293-304.
  24. Allen. B.L. and Hampton, J.O., (2020). Minimizing animal welfare harms associated with predation management in agro-ecosystems. Biological Reviews 95: 1097-1108.

Contact

Email: SAWC.Secretariat@gov.scot

Post:

The Scottish Animal Welfare Commission Secretariat
Animal Health and Welfare Team
P-Spur, Saughton House
Broomhouse Drive
Edinburgh EH11 3XD

Back to top