Climate change - Scottish National Adaptation Plan 2024-2029: monitoring and evaluation framework
Framework we will use to monitor and evaluate progress in delivering the Scottish National Adaptation Plan 2024 to 2029. The Adaptation Plan sets out the actions that the Scottish Government and partners will take to respond to the impacts of climate change from 2024 to 2029.
Appendix 1: Indicator quality criteria assessment, discussion and metadata
Details of each of the annual objective indicators are provided below. Detailed information on the 5-yearly outcome level indicators can be found in the baseline report.
Indicator criteria
The following criteria were used to assess the objective indicators. In the following pages an assessment of each of the indicators against these criteria is provided alongside a description of the indicator and its metadata and any identified data limitations or areas for future data improvements.
Criterion |
Description |
Low |
Moderate |
High |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adaptation relevance |
The indicator should relate to key elements of climate adaptation, including vulnerability, risk, exposure and adaptive capacity |
Minimal to no relevance to key climate adaptation elements |
Some relevance to key climate adaptation elements |
Clear relevance to key climate adaptation elements |
Representativeness |
The indicator should be representative as possible of the key characteristics of the objective area within the adaptation plan that it fits under |
Indicator only represents a small element of the objective area |
Indicator somewhat represents the key characteristics of the objective area |
Indicator represents well the key characteristics of the objective area |
Data availability |
Data for the indicator is readily available and accessible for use by wide range of stakeholders |
No data available or heavily restricted access to necessary data |
Data exists but requires resources and expertise to fully access |
Data fully and freely available |
Sensitivity |
The indicator should be sensitive enough to detect changes over time, particularly in relation to the lifespan of the adaptation plan |
Changes in indicator not detectable over the required time-period |
Indicator data is somewhat sensitive enough to detect changes over the required time-period |
Indicator data is sensitive enough to detect changes over the required time-period |
Understanding |
The indicator should be easily understandable by a wide range of stakeholders, including non-experts, to ensure effective communication |
Technical expertise required to fully understand indicator |
Some technical expertise required but broadly understandable to non-expert audiences |
Indicator is clearly understandable to a wide audience |
Practicality |
Indicator should be cost-effective to use and have low resource requirements for data collection and analysis |
Prohibitively expensive and/or impractical to use indicator data and/or barriers which cannot be worked through |
Some expenses and resources required to use indicator data and/or other barriers to access which would need to be worked through |
Cost-effective and low-resource to use indicator data |
Outcome 1: Nature connects across our land, settlements, coasts and seas
Objective NC1 – Nature-based solutions are protected and enhanced to enable healthier, cooler, water resilient and nature-rich places
Indicator title |
Extent of green-blue land cover in urban areas |
---|---|
Description |
This indicator shows the accessible and non-accessible greenspaces (woodland open semi-natural areas, inland water, beach or foreshore, manmade surface, multi-surface) in urban areas in Scotland. |
Data source |
Ordnance Survey |
Ambition |
Maintaining/increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Indicator limited by pace of change over time. While the indicator covers most public and private greenspaces it does not cover the tree canopy over hard surfacing or green roofs, which are also relevant in terms of adaptation. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Directly relevant to adaptation. Green-blue land cover in urban areas reflects the extent of natural spaces in cities that provide crucial ecosystem services. It is relevant for climate adaptation as it captures how well cities are prepared to adapt to the challenges posed by climate change, making urban environments more sustainable and liveable. Urban greenspace contributes to temperature regulation, biodiversity and wellbeing and water flow and run-off regulation. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Representative of key aspects of objective. If nature based solutions are increasingly implemented there should be greater protection of, and creation of additional, urban greenspace. Covers public and private greenspaces, including woodland, open semi-natural, inland water, beach or foreshore, and manmade surface. It also distinguishes the different functions of greenspaces, such as public park or garden, school grounds, private garden, allotments, playing fields, etc. However, it does not cover the tree canopy over hard surfacing or green roofs, which are also relevant in terms of adaptation. |
Data availability |
Moderate |
Data available through Public Sector geospatial agreement (PGSA) but not freely available. The cost of the data could potentially act as a barrier to access for some. |
Sensitivity |
Moderate |
Data updated biannually in April and October, but likely slow to change over time so longer-term trend will be important for context. |
Understanding |
High |
This indicator on green-blue land cover in urban areas can be widely understood by a broad range of stakeholders in relation to the extent of natural spaces in cities associated with resilience. |
Practicality |
Moderate |
Indicator able to be requested through OS under Public Sector geospatial agreement (PSGA) |
Indicator title |
Proportion of adults who live within a five-minute walk of their nearest green or blue space |
---|---|
Description |
Proportion of adults living within a five-minute walking distances of their nearest green or blue space |
Data source |
Scottish Household Survey |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Data likely to be slow to change within SNAP3 period so longer term tracking of trend will be important. |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
The indicator captures the distance to the nearest public or open space, but does not reflect the level of accessibility, the perception of safety people have toward the green and blue spaces nor the frequency of access. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
High |
Relates to objective as if nature based solutions are increasingly implemented there should be greater protection of existing, and creation of additional, green and blue spaces. The figures for this indicator come from the Scottish Household Survey (SHS). It captures a representative sample of adults in Scotland. |
Data availability |
High |
SHS data publicly available |
Sensitivity |
High |
Annual updates available |
Understanding |
High |
Benefits of proximity to green and blue spaces to climate adaptation widely evidenced and understood. |
Practicality |
High |
Statistical data for this indicator is already being collected and publicly accessible, making it practical to monitor as an indicator. |
Objective NC2 – Landscape scale solutions are implemented for sustainable and collaborative land use including protecting and enhancing Scotland's soils
Indicator title |
Newly protected land and marine features |
---|---|
Description |
Number of hectares of newly protected land and marine features across Scotland. |
Data source |
NatureScot |
Ambition |
Annual increase maintained over time |
Unit |
Number of hectares |
Limitations & data development |
Monitoring of protected areas is planned to shift towards site rather than feature-scale monitoring. This is expected to improve ability to capture larger-scale pressures and threats relevant to climate adaptation. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Relevant to climate adaptation as better protected land and marine area will be more resilient to climate change impacts. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Captures a key measure of action being taken to protect natural sites, but does not capture every land and marine area in Scotland where other protection measures not covered through this data source may be being put in place. |
Data availability |
Moderate |
Frequency of data updates to be decided. |
Sensitivity |
High |
If actions are being taken to protect natural sites captured in indicator changes should be detected over indicator timescale. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Not all actions taken to protect natural sites able to be captured in indicator so accompanying narrative will be important to ensure understanding. |
Practicality |
Moderate |
Data and indicator updates available via NatureScot. |
Indicator title |
Proportion of Scotland's protected features in favourable condition |
---|---|
Description |
Number of hectares of protected features in favourable condition as assessed by NatureScot's Site Condition Monitoring (SCM) programme. This indicator shows the efforts to improve the condition of natural features in protected sites as they will ensure terrestrial habitats are in good ecological health in Scotland. This indicator relates to the quality of natural habitats. |
Data source |
NatureScot |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
For the purposes of the Official Statistic, 'favourable condition' includes natural features that are assessed through SCM as being in favourable or unfavourable recovering condition. It also includes previously unfavourable natural features where necessary management measures have been put in place since the last SCM assessment, so that in NatureScot's expert judgment the natural feature will in due course reach favourable condition. The indicator does not include offshore marine sites and features in Scotland beyond 12 nautical miles, and primarily focuses on protected sites and not all natural sites, which may limit its representativeness of the broader ecological health and connectivity. The indicator only captures a sample of designated natural features each year. Monitoring of protected areas is planned to shift towards site rather than feature-scale monitoring. This is expected to improve ability to capture larger-scale pressures and threats relevant to climate adaptation. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Landscapes which are protected and in better condition will provide greater resilience to climate change impacts. This indicator is relevant for climate adaptation as it directly relates to the resilience of ecosystems and their ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Provides a measure of the effectiveness of nature protection measures in protecting landscapes so is directly relevant to objectives. However, only captures a sample of designated natural features each year. These are dynamic and reflects new condition assessments being completed as well as the implementation and cessation of remedial management activities. The indicator also does not include offshore marine sites and features in Scotland beyond 12 nautical miles, and primarily focuses on protected sites and not all natural sites, which may limit its representativeness of the broader ecological health and connectivity. |
Data availability |
High |
Publicly available via NatureScot. The Site Condition Monitoring (SCM) program is a rolling monitoring effort that aims to assess the condition of a sample of designated natural features each year. Detailed data per type of habitat is available on the NatureScot website, ensuring that data is current and reliable. |
Sensitivity |
Moderate |
Annual updates which can demonstrate ongoing change. However, may not reflect notable changes within shorter periods so it will be important to consider the overall longer-term trend when interpreting data presented. |
Understanding |
High |
This indicator on condition of protected sites can be widely understood by a broad range of stakeholders in relation to improved ecological health and associated resilience. |
Practicality |
High |
Data updates publicly available and updates available through NatureScot. |
Objective NC3 – Development planning (including Local Development Plans and associated delivery programmes) takes current and future climate risks into account and is a key lever in enabling places to adapt
Indicator title |
Number of Local Development Plans adopted by local authorities since National Planning Framework 4 publication |
---|---|
Description |
Indicator measures the number of Local Development Plans adopted by local authorities since National Planning Framework 4 publication in 2023 |
Data source |
Scottish Government |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
Number of Plans |
Limitations & data development |
Local Development Plans only represent one mechanism for improving development planning. Indicator cannot measure the effectiveness of any actions resulting from the Plan. In the longer term it will be helpful if impact of Local Development Plans can be better monitored. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Local Development Plans represent a key mechanism for place-based development planning. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Local Development Plans only represent one mechanism for improving development planning and other mechanisms may not be captured through this single indicator. |
Data availability |
High |
Local Development Plans are published by Local Authorities and publicly available. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Within the lifetime of SNAP3 all local authorities should have a new LDP in place so change will be able to be tracked across the Plan period. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Some understanding of the National Planning Framework and Local Development Plan process required to understand indicator. |
Practicality |
High |
Data available through Scottish Government to allow indicator to be updated. |
Objective NC4 – Nature networks across every local authority area are improving ecological connectivity and climate resilience, alongside other transformative national actions to halt biodiversity loss by 2030
Indicator title |
Number of nature networks across Scotland |
---|---|
Description |
Number of local authorities reporting implementation of nature networks |
Data source |
Scottish Government |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Data is based on self-reported local authority data without a robust measurement methodology. Cannot say anything about the quality or condition of nature networks in place. This is an early proxy indicator; through the Scottish Biodiversity Strategy a monitoring and evaluation strategy will be developed which will support improved data in this space. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Nature Networks are an important mechanism for restoring and protecting nature as well as providing benefits to wildlife and local people. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Nature Networks are a key element of this objective however the representativeness of this indicator is limited by the robustness of methodology in place. It only represents whether or not a nature network is in place but cannot describe what it looks like or its condition so only provides a partial picture at this point. |
Data availability |
Moderate |
Data collected by Scottish Government from Local Authorities so not publicly available. |
Sensitivity |
Moderate |
May not show high levels of change on an annual basis and availability of data to demonstrate change dependent on Scottish Government collation of data. |
Understanding |
High |
Provides a simple measure of Nature Networks across Scotland. |
Practicality |
High |
Indicator updates available in Scottish Government when collected. |
Indicator title |
Abundance of terrestrial species |
---|---|
Description |
Percentage change in terrestrial species abundance since 1994 |
Data source |
NatureScot |
Ambition |
Maintaining or increasing over 5 year Plan period |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Data can only represent a sample of the species present. Species abundance linked to other factors outside of climate change risks and resilience. But data generated by well-established national monitoring schemes. |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
More resilient landscapes will support increased species abundance. But also linked to other factors outside of climate change risks and resilience. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
High |
Higher species abundance will support improved nature networks but indicator doesn't provide a complete picture as only a sample of the species present are represented. |
Data availability |
High |
Publicly available and published online through NatureScot. |
Sensitivity |
Moderate |
Annual updates which reflect change available but need to look at longer term trend due to annual fluctuations in data. |
Understanding |
Low |
Technical/specialist expertise likely required to fully understand indicator. Strong explanatory narrative required in any reporting. |
Practicality |
High |
Data available through NatureScot. |
Table 36: NC4.3
Indicator title |
Occupancy of terrestrial species |
---|---|
Description |
Percentage change in species occupancy across Scotland since 1994 |
Data source |
NatureScot |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Data can only represent a sample of the species present. Compared to abundance based data occupancy data uses more ad hoc presence-only biological records. Species occupancy linked other factors outside of climate change risks and resilience. |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
More resilient landscapes will support increased species occupancy. But also linked to other factors outside of climate change risks and resilience. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Occupancy trends are based on the number of sites where a species is present, reflecting the size of the range within which it is found. Improved nature networks which are more resilient to climate impacts should provide more sites for species to inhabit. However data limited as only represents a sample of the species present. |
Data availability |
High |
Publicly available and published online through NatureScot. |
Sensitivity |
Moderate |
Annual updates which reflect change available but need to look at longer term trend due to annual fluctuations in data. In addition, occupancy trends are based on the number of sites where a species is present, reflecting the size of the range within which it is found, and can be less sensitive to change than measures of abundance. |
Understanding |
Low |
Technical/specialist expertise likely required to fully understand indicator. Strong explanatory narrative required in any reporting. |
Practicality |
High |
Data available through NatureScot. |
Objective NC5 – Evidence-informed planning and management improves ecosystem health, values our marine environment and supports our Blue Economy
Indicator title |
Abundance of marine species |
---|---|
Description |
Percentage change in marine species abundance since 1994 |
Data source |
NatureScot |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Only covers a sample of species, dominated by seabirds. The marine elements of this NatureScot indicator continue to be under development as new species data becomes available. |
Table 39: NC5.1 Quality Assessment
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
More resilient landscapes will support increased species abundance. But also linked to other factors. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
High |
Provides a measure of species abundance which can reflect the resilience of marine ecosystems. However, only covers a sample of species. |
Data availability |
High |
Publicly available and published online through NatureScot. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Annual updates which reflect change available. |
Understanding |
Low |
Technical/specialist expertise likely required to fully understand indicator. Strong explanatory narrative required in any reporting due to some of the indicator limitations. |
Practicality |
Moderate |
Data for indicator updates available through NatureScot. |
Objective NC6 – Resilient natural carbon stores and sinks (such as peatland, forests and blue carbon) are supporting Scotland's net zero pathway, alongside timber production, biodiversity gains, flood resilience and the priorities of local communities
Indicator title |
Hectares of restored peatland |
---|---|
Description |
Hectares of restored peatland in Scotland per year |
Data source |
NatureScot Peatland Action |
Ambition |
Increasing or maintaining over time |
Unit |
Hectares |
Limitations & data development |
Hectares of peatland restored per year is a proxy measure which doesn't directly represent a reduction in emissions or linked adaptation outcomes. Work is ongoing to improve peatland restoration data in the future to fill these gaps. |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
Relevant to a number of key adaptation elements, but as a proxy outcome measure. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Represents key elements of the objective in supporting carbon stores and sinks. Peatlands act as natural carbon stores and therefore an increase in peatland stores will contribute to supporting Scotland's net zero pathway. They also support wider outcomes through preserving biodiversity, minimising flood risk and ensuring safe drinking water. However, these outcomes cannot be directly measured through hectares of peatland restored so indicator only acts as a proxy and doesn't represent all aspects of the objective. |
Data availability |
High |
Publicly available data. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Annual data updates available to track change over time. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
May require some technical understanding but broadly understandable to non-expert audiences with accompanying indicator narrative. |
Practicality |
High |
Data available for indicator updates through NatureScot. |
Indicator title |
Woodland creation |
---|---|
Description |
Hectares of all woodland in Scotland created each year |
Data source |
Woodland Statistics (via Forest Research) |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
All woodland created will not necessarily be compliant with UKFS version 5, which was reviewed and revised with stakeholders to ensure amongst other things that compliance with the standard increases the resilience of the forest resource. Scottish Forestry approvals will require compliance with the updated standard from 1st October 2024. |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
Woodland creation acts as an important natural climate change mitigation measure and also has wider adaptation benefits in increasing biodiversity, providing flood protection and reducing soil erosion. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Data cannot currently capture how resilient our woodlands are, however woodland creation approvals must demonstrate compliance with the UKFS. The Forestry Grant Scheme (FGS) requirements include the need to select trees that are suitable or very suitable for both the site and climate. |
Data availability |
High |
Data publicly available and published online via Forest Research. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Annual change able to be measured and reflects activity in previous year. |
Understanding |
High |
Woodland production understandable to a wide audience. |
Practicality |
High |
Data available for indicator updates through Forest Research. |
Indicator title |
Area of forest and woodland registered under the Woodland Carbon Code |
---|---|
Description |
Area of forest and woodland registered under the Woodland Carbon Code (WCC) in Hectares each year |
Data source |
Woodland Statistics (via Forest Research) |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
Hectares |
Limitations & data development |
This indicator does not capture all woodland partly because of the additionality rules for acceptance onto the scheme. This measure is only relevant to newly planted woodlands that would not be planted without additional financial support from carbon finance. |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
The WCC acts as an important natural climate change mitigation measure and also supports wider adaptation benefits in increasing biodiversity, providing flood protection and reducing soil erosion. But is not solely adaptation focused or the only route towards better managed/adapted forestry environments |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Data do not currently capture levels of woodland resilience. Woodland creation approvals must demonstrate compliance with the UKFS, and all WCC projects carry out risk assessments before finalising woodland design. Forestry Grant Scheme (FGS) requirements include the need to select trees that are suitable or very suitable for both the site and climate. |
Data availability |
High |
Data publicly available and published online via Forest Research. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Annual change able to be measured and reflects activity in previous year. |
Understanding |
High |
Woodland area data understandable to a wide audience. |
Practicality |
High |
Data available for indicator updates through Forest Research. |
Outcome 2: Communities are creating climate-resilient, healthy and equitable places
Objective C1 – Regional collaborations are driving inclusive, effective and place-based adaptation action across all of Scotland
Indicator title |
Geographical coverage of regional adaptation collaboration |
---|---|
Description |
The indicator will measure the geographical coverage of active collaborations on adaptation based on % of local authorities covered by partnerships. These collaborations will not have a set structure, but must actively address climate risks across organisational and/or local authority boundaries. |
Data source |
Adaptation Scotland |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
This indicator is based on Adaptation Scotland's qualitative perceptions of collaboration so provides a subjective and qualitative view of collaboration coverage rather than a quantitative measure. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Relevant to adaptation outcome as regional adaptation collaborations play a key role at a community action level. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Represents objective area. Captures range of collaborations and their coverage with a specific adaptation focus regionally. However, is based on qualitative assessment of collaboration so may not capture all activity within a region. |
Data availability |
Moderate |
Data available in Adaptation Scotland Programme annual reports. Adaptation Scotland may not have full knowledge of all types of new and existing partnerships. |
Sensitivity |
Moderate |
Data will be available annually but setting up of additional collaborations dependent on a range of factors including resource and capacity constraints so indicator may be slow to change from baseline. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Will require some explanation in accompanying narrative in terms of definitions of collaboration and methodology for assessment. |
Practicality |
Moderate |
Data for indicator updates available through Adaptation Scotland but limited to collaborations which Adaptation Scotland are aware of. |
Objective C2 – Communities and individuals are supported, informed, and able to take locally led adaptation action, supporting local priorities and resilient, healthy, and equitable places
Indicator title |
Proportion of adults viewing climate change as an immediate and urgent problem |
---|---|
Description |
Percentage of adults viewing climate change as an immediate and urgent problem |
Data source |
Scottish Household Survey |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Data feeding into indicator will not be updated frequently during SNAP3 period. |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
Captures awareness of climate change issues, which may include climate risks and vulnerabilities. But could also capture other aspects of climate change more widely such as the need for mitigation actions. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Uses a representative sample of Scottish adults, however as noted above not directly asking about climate change impacts. |
Data availability |
High |
Data publicly available and published through Scottish Household Survey. |
Sensitivity |
Low |
Biennial data updates with one year lag in (e.g. 2023 data published in 2024) so updates within the 5-year SNAP3 period will be limited. |
Understanding |
High |
Concern about climate change easily understandable to most groups. |
Practicality |
High |
Data updates available through Scottish Household Survey. |
Indicator title |
Level of adaptation action being taken by people in Scotland |
---|---|
Description |
Tbc – will use data from Scottish Climate Survey currently in development Intended to explore the proportion of people undertaking different types of actions to increase household or personal resilience to climate change impacts in Scotland (e.g. installing property flood resilience measures, signing up to weather warning alerts) |
Data source |
Tbc – will use data from Scottish Climate Survey currently in development |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Tbc - will use data from Scottish Climate Survey currently in development |
The new Scottish Climate Survey has been established as part of ongoing data development activities to improve the data available for monitoring and evaluation of several strategies and plans across the Scottish Government. As the data source is still in development, full assessment of the quality and usefulness of the indicator is yet to be confirmed. A baseline data collection wave is confirmed for Autumn 2024 (published in Spring 2025), however, future survey waves are dependent upon future budget decisions.
Objective C3 – Communities and individuals are able to prepare for, respond to and recover from emergencies in a way that builds future climate resilience, complements the work of emergency responders and protects those with vulnerabilities to multiple risks
Indicator title |
Number of people using flood forecasting and warning services |
---|---|
Description |
Number of users accessing flood forecasting and warning services. Measured by:
|
Data source |
SEPA |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
Number of people |
Limitations & data development |
Number of people using website services is measured by website hits but not currently possible to distinguish who is accessing these, and whether it is the same. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Use of early warning systems directly relates to people's preparedness for emergencies. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Represents a key action for increasing community preparedness to weather related emergencies, but not a direct measure of action taken as does not measure how people respond to or use the information accessed. In addition, only measures website hits so not possible to understand who is accessing warnings and where they come from. |
Data availability |
Moderate |
Data not publicly available, held by SEPA so would need to be requested. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Regular updates available to track progress. |
Understanding |
High |
Flood warning systems widely understood and provides a simple and understandable measure of these. |
Practicality |
High |
Indicator updates available annually through SEPA. |
Indicator title |
Adults who would offer support to people in their community during an emergency, such as a flood, who may not cope well |
---|---|
Description |
Percentage of adults who agree that in an emergency, such as a flood, they would offer to help people in their neighbourhood who might not be able to cope well |
Data source |
Scottish Household Survey |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Captures intention rather than action taken to provide support during emergency. Although question directly asks about flooding as an example of an emergency it could capture risks more widely than just climate related risks. |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
Provides an indication of intention to support community resilience at a community level so links to outcome, but not a measure of support actually provided. Could also capture emergencies more widely than just those resulting from climate risks. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
As above, captures intention rather than action taken and could be wider than just climate related risks (although question asks directly about flooding as an example). Captures responses through representative sample of Scottish Adult population in SHS. |
Data availability |
High |
Data publicly available and published with SHS results |
Sensitivity |
High |
Question asked annually in SHS |
Understanding |
High |
Provides a widely understandable measure of intention to take action / community support |
Practicality |
High |
Indicator updates available through SHS data |
Indicator title |
Availability of flood insurance – proportion of householders with prior flood claims who can receive quotes from 5 or more insurers |
---|---|
Description |
Indicator provides a measure of the proportion of householders with prior flood claims who can receive quotes from 5 or more insurers through Price Comparison websites FloodRe scheme[5] |
Data source |
Flood RE |
Ambition |
Maintaining over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Relevant to adaptation as scheme aims to ensure homeowners with flood claims. This is a group who struggle to obtain insurance so provides a mechanism for them to be able to obtain other insurance. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Provides a measure of a key policy initiative to improve insurance availability, but indicator only captures those applying for insurance through scheme quotes for insurance rather than purchased policies. |
Data availability |
Moderate |
Data available through request from FloodRE |
Sensitivity |
High |
Data updated quarterly so changes in indicator can be tracked in annual SNAP3 reporting. |
Understanding |
High |
Availability of insurance widely understood so provides an understandable indicator to a range of stakeholders. |
Practicality |
High |
Indicator updates available through FloodRE. |
Objective C4 – New buildings are designed for a future climate, and opportunities for adaptation in existing buildings are taken during maintenance or retrofit
Indicator title |
Proportion of dwellings with urgent disrepair to critical elements |
---|---|
Description |
Percentage of dwellings in Scotland with urgent disrepair to critical elements |
Data source |
Scottish House Condition Survey (SHCS) |
Ambition |
Decreasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Limitations in identifications of newer buildings in survey as ranges categorise new buildings as post 1982. Urgent disrepair covers a large range of issues, with some being more relevant to climate risks than others (e.g. could cover missing slates on roof covering and also wall finish related problems). |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
Has some relevance to resilience in terms of buildings being better adapted to climate risks, but with limitations noted above. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Relevant to some elements of objective – new buildings which are better designed or existing buildings which are better maintained should be less vulnerable to extreme weather events. But limitations as noted above with the data in terms of identification of new buildings and does not capture adaptation measures taken during maintenance or retrofit. |
Data availability |
High |
Publicly available and published with SHCS results. |
Sensitivity |
Moderate |
Data regularly captured through SHCS but may be slow to change over time. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Understandable as a measure but the indicator limitations would require a more detailed understanding of the SHCS data set. |
Practicality |
High |
Indicator updates available through SHCS data. |
Objective C5 – Scotland's historic environment is preparing for a future climate, and the transformational power of culture, heritage and creativity supports Scotland's adaptation journey
Indicator title |
Historic Environment Scotland grant applications including adaptation measures |
---|---|
Description |
Proportion of Historic Environment Scotland grant applications funded which include adaptation measures |
Data source |
Historic Environment Scotland |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Recipients of HES grants will only ever be a small proportion of historic environment assets in Scotland. However, there are limited sources for data on how Scotland's historic environment is preparing for a future climate, and the HES grants programme eligibility covers all Scottish historic environment assets (tangible or intangible) and so demonstrates the most potential to provide an overview of adaptation action across the historic environment. |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
Links to the communities outcome in creating more climate-resilient places, but doesn't capture all historic environment assets (only those awarded grants). |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Has a direct link to the objective as it represents one of the key policy levers to support funding for Scotland's historic environment. Data provided will specifically capture adaptation rather than wider climate related activity such as that related to mitigation. As noted above though the data available only represents a small proportion of historic environment assets in Scotland. |
Data availability |
Moderate |
Aim is for data to be published online and publicly available during 2024-25. In interim period access will be limited and data available through request. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Regular monitoring data for HES grants collected and able to be reported on annually specifically in relation to adaptation. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
The protection of historic sites is widely understood, but some specific knowledge of adaptation in the historic environment assets and grants available may be required to fully understand the indicator. |
Practicality |
High |
Indicator updates available through Historic Environment Scotland. |
Objective C6 – Coastal communities are preparing for and adapting to coastal erosion and sea level rise
Indicator title |
Number of local authority Coastal Change Adaptation Plans published |
---|---|
Description |
Number of local authority Coastal Change Adaptation Plans published |
Data source |
Scottish Government |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
Number |
Limitations & data development |
This indicator only provides a measure of the number of Plans published. Currently consistent data is not available for an indicator to measure the actions taken as a result of Plans being in place and the impacts of these actions. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Coastal Adaptation Plans are a key mechanism for coastal resilience and adaptation actions across Scotland. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
High |
Indicator will capture all Coastal Adaptation Plans across Scotland so will show a national picture. |
Data availability |
High |
A list of completed and ongoing Coastal Adaptation Plans will be made available at www.DynamicCoast.com/cca |
Sensitivity |
High |
Information available regularly. Information on complete or updated Coastal Adaptation Plans are expected to be reported by each local authority via annual Public Body Climate Change Duty reporting returns. This is expected to show change over SNAP3 period. |
Understanding |
High |
The indicator should be widely understandable and captures a simple measure of change. |
Practicality |
High |
Indicator updates available through Scottish Government. |
Outcome 3: Public services are collaborating in effective, inclusive adaptation action
Objective PS1 – Providers of public services have the governance, culture, skills and resources for, and are collaborating in effective, inclusive adaptation action and Objective PS2 – People can access the public services they need, and critical assets, systems and networks are resilient to the impacts of the changing climate
Indicator title |
Level of risk assessment reported across the public sector |
---|---|
Description |
A measure of degree of risk assessment taken by public sector groups (local authorities, NHS boards, educational institutions, IJBs, transport partnerships, others). Scored on a scale from 'none', 'limited', 'comprehensive', 'advanced' |
Data source |
Sustainable Scotland Network (SSN) |
Ambition |
Increasing over time across all groups |
Unit |
Qualitative assessment of risk assessment taken – 'none', 'limited', 'comprehensive' or 'advanced' |
Limitations & data development |
Data is collated from statutory local authority reporting so does not cover any additional risk assessment not reported on through this route. Analysis of risk level undertaken qualitatively by SSN so is a subjective measure of risk assessment level. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Risk assessment is a key element of climate adaptation response and action. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Captures some key elements of the objective, particularly around culture and skills. But does not capture collaboration or inclusivity of action which are two key areas of the associated objective. |
Data availability |
Moderate |
Data is available to be requested through SSN and analysis published in their annual reporting. But datasets not published alongside analysis. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Annual changes will be visible through annual reporting and analysis process. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Requires some understanding of SSN's analytical framework (and subjective nature of assessment) but concept of risk assessment widely understood. |
Practicality |
High |
Already gathered and analysed by SSN for their annual reporting. |
Indicator title |
Level of adaptation action taken across the public sector |
---|---|
Description |
A measure of level of adaptation action taken by public sector groups (local authorities, NHS boards, educational institutions, IJBs, transport partnerships, others). Scored on a scale from 'none', 'some action', 'good action', 'advanced action' |
Data source |
Sustainable Scotland Network (SSN) |
Ambition |
Increasing over time across all groups |
Unit |
Qualitative assessment of level of adaptation action taken – 'none', 'some action', 'good action', or 'advanced action' |
Limitations & data development |
Data is collated from statutory local authority reporting so does not cover any additional risk assessment not reported on through this route. Analysis of risk level undertaken qualitatively by SSN so is a subjective measure of risk assessment level. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Provides a measure of adaptation action being taken across the public sector. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Captures whether adaptation action is happening in the public sector but measures quantity rather than the effectiveness of the collaborative actions being taken. Provides a qualitative measure of level of action based on what is reported to SSN. |
Data availability |
Moderate |
Data is available to be requested through SSN and analysis published in their annual reporting. But datasets not published alongside analysis. |
Sensitivity |
Low |
Captures annual public sector reporting but can only capture actions included in those annual reports rather than any wider risk assessment activity. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Requires some understanding of SSN's analytical framework (and subjective nature of assessment) but concept of adaptation actions which could be taken are widely understood. |
Practicality |
High |
Already gathered and analysed by SSN for their annual reporting. |
Objective PS3 – Partnerships for water resource planning and rainwater drainage networks are active in prioritised catchments to support climate resilient places and drought and flooding resilience
PS3.1
Indicator title |
Average per household water consumption |
---|---|
Description |
Average per household water consumption in Scotland for:
|
Data source |
Scottish Water |
Ambition |
Decreasing over time |
Unit |
Litres/household/day |
Limitations & data development |
Fewer than 0.1% of Scotland's domestic properties have a water meter. The unmetered figure is extrapolated using a Per Household Consumption Monitor which contains c.10,000 properties in 135 zones. Each of these properties is representative of one of six socio-economic categories which enables extrapolation to the whole of Scotland. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Provides a measure of water usage which is linked to the resilience of the water system to drought and increased demand from other wider pressures. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Represents a key area of the objective around protecting water quantity, allows the tracking of water usage across Scotland. But represents a sample of households in Scotland and as households are not metered provides an estimate of each household usage. It does not cover non-domestic water consumption, or water abstracted from the natural environment for purposes other than the public water supply. |
Data availability |
High |
This information is published on the Water Industry Commissioner for Scotland website, as part of the Scottish Water Annual Return. |
Sensitivity |
Moderate |
Able to show change annually over 5 year plan period, however the data will be variable so longer term trend will be needed to show progress and the effectiveness of effectiveness of campaigns to change customer behaviour, value water and water efficiency improvements. |
Understanding |
High |
Provides a widely understandable indicator of water usage. |
Practicality |
High |
Some resource required to agree data access and request externally for annual updates. |
Indicator title |
Number of properties (sewer) flooded during the year due to severe weather |
---|---|
Description |
Provides a measure of the number of properties sewer flooded (internally) during the year due to severe weather |
Data source |
Scottish Water |
Ambition |
Broadly maintained over time (not getting worse with climate change) |
Unit |
Number |
Limitations & data development |
The volume, location, frequency and intensity of rainfall in each year will have an impact on the number of properties which are impacted by weather related sewer flooding. Ground saturation levels may also impact the number of properties flooded internally. There is also no legislative requirement to reduce sewer flooding instances. |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
A significant proportion of the waste water network in Scotland consists of combined foul drainage (sewage) and surface water drainage (rainwater). Climate change may increase the number of incidents, due to the increased frequency and intensity of rainfall events, but the relationship is complex. Sewer flooding can be exacerbated by factors such as urban growth and development, network changes and incidents (e.g. blockages) unrelated to climate change. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
This indicator is broadly representative of the potential impact of worsening storm events and the ability of the combined waste water network to deal with rainwater, in any given year. |
Data availability |
High |
This information is published on the Water Industry Commissioner for Scotland website, as part of the Scottish Water Annual Return. |
Sensitivity |
Moderate |
Rainfall patterns experienced each year will vary and affect the reported indicator. Equally, changes in the network, development or other network issues may change the vulnerability of properties to flooding. |
Understanding |
Moderate - Low |
This indicator requires an understanding of how waste water and rainwater are managed in Scotland within combined foul and surface water systems. |
Practicality |
High |
Some resource required to agree data access and request externally for annual updates. |
Objective PS4 – The transport system is prepared for current and future impacts of climate change and is safe for all users, reliable for everyday journeys and resilient to weather-related disruption
Indicator title |
Number of ferry service cancellations |
---|---|
Description |
Number of ferry service cancellations in Scotland as a result of weather conditions |
Data source |
Transport Scotland |
Ambition |
Decreasing over time |
Unit |
Number |
Limitations & data development |
Relevant to climate change adaptation as a more resilient transport system should be more reliable and experience fewer delays during poor weather conditions. However, indicator may be influenced by annual fluctuations in severe weather events so the indicator should be understood in this context. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Provides a measure of the resilience of transport systems to climate change impacts. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
High |
Partially relevant to the reliability of the transport system in relation to weather-related disruption for a key mode of transport and provides a robust data source for measuring this. |
Data availability |
Moderate |
Data not publicly available – requires data request. |
Sensitivity |
Moderate |
Data updated annually so regular updates available to track change. But will be sensitive to fluctuations in annual severe weather events experienced so overall trend will be important. |
Understanding |
High |
Provides a widely understandable measure of weather related transport disruption. |
Practicality |
High |
Indicator updates available via Transport Scotland. |
Indicator title |
Proportion of trunk roads which require close monitoring |
---|---|
Description |
Proportion of trunk roads in Scotland which require close monitoring |
Data source |
Transport Scotland |
Ambition |
Decreasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Provides a measure of the resilience of transport systems to climate change impacts. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
High |
Represents the objective well with a robust data source. A transport system which is resilient to weather-related disruption should have fewer trunk roads requiring close monitoring, since roads in better condition should be better able to withstand extreme weather impacts. |
Data availability |
High |
Publicly available, published in Scottish Transport Statistics. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Annual data updates available which will reflect year to year change. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Requires some understanding of the relationship between road maintenance/condition and resilience to weather impacts. |
Practicality |
High |
Data and indicator updates available through Transport Scotland. |
Indicator title |
Proportion of LA roads which may require maintenance |
---|---|
Description |
Proportion of local authority roads in Scotland which are reported as maybe requiring maintenance |
Data source |
Transport Scotland (data collected by WDM ltd using SCANNER vehicle for Scottish Road Maintenance Condition Survey) |
Ambition |
Decreasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Provides a measure of the resilience of transport systems to climate change impacts. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
High |
Represents the objective well with a robust data source. A transport system which is resilient to weather-related disruption should have local authority requiring close monitoring, since roads in better condition should be better able to withstand extreme weather impacts. |
Data availability |
High |
Publicly available, published in Scottish Transport Statistics. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Annual data updates available which will reflect year to year change. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Requires some understanding of the relationship between road maintenance/condition and resilience to weather impacts. |
Practicality |
High |
Data and indicator updates available through Transport Scotland. |
Indicator title |
Number of weather related train delays |
---|---|
Description |
Number of reported weather related train delays in Scotland |
Data source |
Network Rail |
Ambition |
Decreasing over time |
Unit |
Number |
Limitations & data development |
Relevant to climate change adaptation as a more resilient transport system should be more reliable and experience fewer delays during poor weather conditions. However, indicator may be influenced by annual fluctuations in severe weather events so the indicator should be understood in this context. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Provides a measure of the resilience of transport systems to climate change impacts. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
High |
Represents the objective well with a robust data source - a transport system which is resilient to weather-related disruption should experience fewer weather related delays. |
Data availability |
Moderate |
Not publicly available – needs to be requested. |
Sensitivity |
Moderate |
Should be possible to see change over SNAP3 period with regular updates. But will be sensitive to fluctuations in annual severe weather events experienced so overall trend will be important. |
Understanding |
High |
Provides a widely understandable measure of weather related transport disruption. |
Practicality |
High |
Indicator updates available. |
Outcome 4: Economies and industries are adapting and realising opportunities in Scotland's Just Transition
Objective B1 – Businesses are supported to embed the risks of climate change into governance, investment and operations, and are collaborating in effective, inclusive adaptation action
Indicator title |
Businesses monitoring climate related risks |
---|---|
Description |
Percentage of businesses in Scotland reporting assessing climate change related risks |
Data source |
Business Insights and Conditions Survey (BICS) |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
BICS is a voluntary survey and has lower response rates than most other ONS business surveys. Risk assessments reported are at a general level which cannot measure within which area of businesses this is occurring (e.g. within governance, investment or operations). The survey results for Scotland only represent businesses with 10 or more employees. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Business action in relation to adaptation can make them more resilient and prepared for climate hazards, thereby reducing vulnerability. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Captures the extent to which businesses are assessing climate change risks which is a key part of this objective. However, risk assessments reported are at a general level which cannot measure whether this is within governance, investment or operation. The survey results for Scotland only represent businesses with 10 or more employees. |
Data availability |
High |
BICS survey data publicly available. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Regularly gathered and reported on so change over time able to be tracked. |
Understanding |
High |
Provides an understandable measure of whether businesses are assessing climate risks. |
Practicality |
High |
Data available and indicator updates can be provided through BICS publication. |
Indicator title |
Businesses taking action to adapt to the effects of climate change |
---|---|
Description |
Percentage of businesses in Scotland reporting taking action to adapt to effects of climate change |
Data source |
Business Insights and Conditions Survey (BICS) |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
BICS is a voluntary survey and has lower response rates than for most other ONS business surveys. The survey results for Scotland only represent businesses with 10 or more employees. |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Business action in relation to adaptation can make them more resilient and prepared for climate hazards, thereby reducing vulnerability. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Captures the extent to which businesses are taking action to adapt to the impacts of climate change (but at a general level which cannot measure specific action taken or its effectiveness or inclusivity which are key elements of the objective). The survey results for Scotland only represent businesses with 10 or more employees. |
Data availability |
High |
BICS survey data publicly available. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Regularly gathered and reported on so change over time able to be tracked. |
Understanding |
High |
Provides an understandable measure of whether businesses are assessing climate risks. |
Practicality |
High |
Data available and indicator updates can be provided through BICS publication. |
Objective B2 – Farming, fishing and forestry businesses are supported to adapt production and operations in a way that benefits livelihoods, resilience and the economy in a changing climate
Indicator title |
Proportion of agricultural land under management under Agri Environment Climate Scheme |
---|---|
Description |
Percentage of agricultural land under management contracts. This includes the following options:
|
Data source |
Scottish Government |
Ambition |
Increasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Indicator does not capture activities out with the Agri Environment Climate Scheme |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
Links to a key scheme for supporting more resilient agriculture. However, other actions may take place out with this scheme to protect and manage land from climate change impacts so does not capture the full picture of agricultural resilience in Scotland. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
As above, will not capture all activity taking place across Scottish agricultural land. |
Data availability |
Moderate |
Data only available on request. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Data regularly updated. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Provides a widely understandable measure of resilient farming (land under management) but some knowledge of scale and purpose of Agri Environment scheme needed to understand indicator scope and limitations. |
Practicality |
High |
Indicator updates available through Scottish Government data. |
Indicator title |
Proportion of Forest Plans (private and public sector) revised under the new addition of the UKFS |
---|---|
Description |
Measures the proportion of Forest Plans (private and public sector) revised under the new addition of the UKFS as a percentage of area under forest plans. |
Data source |
Scottish Forestry Corporate Plan KPI 1.4 forest plans indicator: https://www.forestry.gov.scot/about/our-plans-and-programmes |
Ambition |
Ensure all future approved plans and amendments comply with the new edition of UKFS after the 'go-live' date in October 2024 |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
The review of existing forest plans to the new UKFS version 5 will take place across the 10+ years after the new edition is live (October 1st 2024). Figures reported in the SF Corporate Plan use NFI woodland area excluding the category 'assumed woodland' as this hasn't established yet (this includes woodland creation areas). |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
Forest plans are one of the principal tools used to manage long-term change in the forest resource. Cover a wide range of elements including adaptation but are not fully adaptation specific. Forest plans must demonstrate compliance with the UK Forestry Standard, the Government's reference standard for sustainable forest management, which was reviewed and revised with stakeholders, in 2023, to ensure compliance with the standard, increases resilience. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Not all forestry will be covered by a forest plan so the indicator will not capture all forestry in Scotland. Approximately 803,000 hectares or 53% of our woodlands are under active management through a 10-year forest plan at time of publication. |
Data availability |
High |
Data publicly available in SF Corporate Plan (SF CP) annual report. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Annual updates available in SF Corporate Plan annual report which will reflect ongoing change. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Complexity of plans and timing of approvals is not widely understood so some knowledge required to understand indicator. |
Practicality |
Moderate |
Indicator updates available through Scottish Forestry but may require some interpretation by Scottish Forestry GIS team. |
Indicator title |
Commercial fish stocks fished at sustainable levels |
---|---|
Description |
Percentage of commercial fish stocks fished at sustainable levels |
Data source |
ICES |
Ambition |
Increasing or maintaining over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Relevant to resilience of Scotland's fishing industry. When combined with indicators 2.4 and 2.5 represents a measure of whether fishing vessels are able to continue to find a market for their fish, are able to fish sustainably, and able to stay in profit. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Represents key element of objective B2 around fishing sustainability. But for full picture needs to be understood in context of wider fishing indicators |
Data availability |
High |
Data available publicly and published as part of National Performance Framework. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Annual data updates available with year on year change evident. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Some technical expertise in fishing sector required but should be broadly understandable to non-technical audiences with accompanying indicator narrative. |
Practicality |
High |
Data available through ICES and already used for indicator in National Performance Framework. |
Indicator title |
Tonnage and value of fish stocks landed |
---|---|
Description |
Tonnage and value of fish stocks (in £) landed in Scotland |
Data source |
Scottish Government, Scottish Sea Fisheries Statistics |
Ambition |
Increasing or maintaining over time |
Unit |
Tonnage and £ |
Limitations & data development |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Relevant to resilience of Scotland's fishing industry. When combined with indicators 2.3 and 2.5 represents a measure of whether fishing vessels are able to continue to find a market for their fish, are able to fish sustainably, and able to stay in profit. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Represents key element of objective B2 around fishing sustainability. But for full picture needs to be understood in context of wider fishing indicators. |
Data availability |
High |
Publicly available data. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Data updated annually and any changes reflected in updates over Plan period. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Some technical expertise in fishing sector required but should be broadly understandable to non-technical audiences with accompanying indicator narrative. |
Practicality |
High |
Data and indicator updates available through Scottish Government. |
Indicator title |
Operating profit for fishing fleets |
---|---|
Description |
Annual operating profit (£) for Scottish fishing fleets |
Data source |
Seafish, Economies of the Fishing Fleet data |
Ambition |
Increasing or maintaining over time |
Unit |
£ |
Limitations & data development |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Relevant to resilience of Scotland's fishing industry. When combined with indicators 2.3 and 2.4 represents a measure of whether fishing vessels are able to continue to find a market for their fish, are able to fish sustainably, and able to stay in profit. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Represents key aspects of adaptation objective area through ability of fishing industry to maintain production and support livelihoods through continued operations. But for full picture needs to be understood in context of wider fishing indicators. |
Data availability |
High |
Publicly available data. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Data updated annually and any changes reflected in updates over Plan period. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Some technical expertise in fishing sector required but should be broadly understandable to non-technical audiences with accompanying indicator narrative. |
Practicality |
High |
Data and indicator updates available through request with Scottish Government. |
Indicator title |
Fish survival to harvest |
---|---|
Description |
Percentage of finfish biomass across the entire production cycle that survives to harvest |
Data source |
Scottish Fish Farm Production Survey |
Ambition |
No decrease in % over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
Data and indicator updates available through Scottish Government |
Adaptation relevance |
Moderate |
Relevant to resilience of Scotland's aquaculture industry. Survival to harvest can be impacted by climatic factors. No decrease would indicate that the aquaculture sector is adapting to the additional pressures of climate change. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Represents key aspects of adaptation objective area through ability of aquaculture industry to maintain production and support livelihoods through continued operations. |
Data availability |
High |
Publicly available data. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Data updated annually and any changes reflected in updates over Plan period. |
Understanding |
Moderate |
Some technical expertise in aquaculture sector required but should be broadly understandable to non-technical audiences with accompanying indicator narrative. |
Practicality |
High |
Data and indicator updates available through Scottish Government publication. |
Objective B4 – Supply chain vulnerabilities for food, goods and vital services from more extreme weather events are identified and managed
Indicator title |
Reported disruption to supply chains as a result of severe weather event |
---|---|
Description |
Percentage of businesses in Scotland reporting disruption to supply chains as a result of a severe weather event |
Data source |
BICS |
Ambition |
Decreasing over time |
Unit |
% |
Limitations & data development |
BICS is a voluntary survey and has lower response rates than for most other ONS business surveys. The survey results for Scotland only represent businesses with 10 or more employees. Will be sensitive to occurrences of severe weather events in a particular year |
Adaptation relevance |
High |
Relevant to adaptation as businesses which are more resilient to climate change should be less vulnerable to supply chain disruption as a result of severe weather events. |
---|---|---|
Representativeness |
Moderate |
Captures the extent to which businesses are impacted by severe weather events so is relevant to objective but will be influenced by occurrences of severe weather events in a particular year so longer term trend important to track. The survey results for Scotland only represent businesses with 10 or more employees. |
Data availability |
High |
BICS survey data publicly available. |
Sensitivity |
High |
Question regularly asked in BICS so change over time able to be tracked over SNAP3 period. |
Understanding |
High |
Provides an understandable measure of how businesses are impacted by climate risks. |
Practicality |
High |
Data and indicator updates available through BICS publication. |
Contact
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback