Socio-economic Baseline Review Methodology and Data Gap Analysis for Offshore Renewables in Scottish Waters
The Data Gap Analysis Report summarises the background to and aims of the overall appraoch to socio-economics and offshore renewable energy planning. It sets out the approach that has been adopted to identifying baseline information requirements, which ta
Appendix B. Interaction Summary Tables and Information Sources by Sector
Aquaculture
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Environmental impacts to aquaculture species as a result of construction, operation and decommissioning (changes in underwater noise, turbidity and water quality). |
All |
Loss of income for fish farm producers through a reduction in farm productivity |
Baseline information on underwater noise, turbidity and water quality at specific locations and projections of how these might change relative to impact thresholds for aquaculture species |
X (Information identified in Column 4 will be provided by SEA/ HRA) |
Displacement of existing or future aquaculture activity |
All |
Reduction in income for aquaculture producers. |
Spatial data on current and potential future locations of aquaculture installations. Information on current economic value and employment for individual sites. |
√ |
Co-management of aquaculture and offshore renewable energy installations in the same area. |
Wind |
Increase the income from the OWF lease. |
Information on location of future offshore wind farm developments with which aquaculture installations will be co-located |
X Dependent on site specific considerations which will only be resolved at project level ( e.g. lease agreements etc) |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
Production and turnover 2005-2009 |
2005-2009 |
Baxter et al (2011) |
Scotland |
Scottish shellfish production survey |
2010 |
Marine Scotland (2010) |
Scotland |
Scottish fish farm production survey |
2009 |
Marine Scotland (2009) |
UK |
Future trends |
2006+ |
Wilding et al (2006) |
Regional |
Economic value and trends |
2010 |
Scottish Salmon Producers Organisation (2010) |
Aviation
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Height obstruction of commercial navigation routes |
Wind |
Additional track miles for helicopters owing to height obstruction in inclement weather Loss of trade at airports |
Existing helicopter routes and intensity of use in proximity to future offshore wind development area Economic value and employment at airports. Runway approach routes in proximity to future offshore wind development area |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
UK Air Passenger Demand Forecasts |
2009+ |
Department for Transport (2009) |
Scotland |
Scottish Transport Statistics |
2010 |
Scottish Government |
Carbon Capture Storage
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Competition for space Increased difficulty of access to pipelines / rigs |
All |
Sterilization of potential storage areas/obstruction of potential pipeline routes Increased maintenance costs for pipeline owners; loss of revenue for asset owners; loss of revenue for dependent businesses/customers |
Potential location of CO2 pipeline network and suitable geological reservoirs. |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
Potential CO2 storage sites, transport options between sources and storage sites (ship and pipeline) |
2009 |
Scottish Centre for Carbon Storage (2009.) |
Scotland |
Refined estimate of CO2 storage capacity in North East Region, estimates of timelines to CCS deployment and employment estimates |
2011 |
Scottish Centre for Carbon Storage (2011) |
Scotland |
Potential transport options and possible European CCS Network |
2010 |
Scottish Government and Scottish Enterprise (2010) |
Scotland |
Potential CO2 storage sites |
2011 |
Baxter et al (2011) |
Coastal Defence and Flood Protection
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Loss of integrity of structures at cable crossings |
All |
Increased maintenance costs |
Location and type of man made defences; maintenance expenditure |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
|
|
SEPA/Local authorities |
Commercial Fisheries
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Displacement and disruption to existing fisheries within arrays and along cable routes |
All |
Reduction in landings/Catch per Unit Effort ( CPUE) |
Distribution and intensity of fishing activity, economic value of landings |
√ |
Disturbance of mobile species and disruption or damage to habitats, nursery and spawning grounds |
All |
Reduction in landings/Catch per Unit Effort ( CPUE) |
Change in extent and intensity of damage compared to baseline; understanding of relationship between habitat quality and fish production |
X (information will be provided by SEA/ HRA) |
Obstruction of navigation routes |
All |
Increased steaming times |
Existing vessel movements, frequency, vessel types, destinations, fuel costs |
√ |
Fouling of fishing gear on cables or seabed infrastructure |
All |
Loss of fishing gear |
Distribution of bottom fishing activity (trawls, pots) over time; frequency of activity, information on frequency of fouling events |
√ |
Cumulative effects of other pressures ( e.g. fisheries closures, spatial closures related to Marine Protected Areas or major offshore developments and changes introduced through Common Fisheries Policy reforms) |
All |
Reduction in CPUE and consequential loss of profit |
Information on spatial and temporal extent of other pressures and their influence on landings values |
√ |
Spillover benefits |
All |
Increased CPUE and/or landings |
Change in extent and intensity of damage compared to baseline; understanding of relationship between habitat quality and fish production |
X (likely to be minor as development areas occupy small areas of sea space) |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
Value and weight of catches by port Average effort (kw days) in sea areas by UK vessels (range) Average value of landings from sea areas (range) Average number of days of foreign vessel fishing activity per ICES square (range) Reported annual catches by fishing type (fixed engine, rod and line, net and coble) |
2005-2009 |
Baxter et al (2011) |
Scotland |
Locations and types of fishing; status of stocks; economic and social aspects of the fisheries |
2010 |
Crawley, D. (2010) |
Fishing District |
Sea Fisheries Statistics for fishing fleet, employment and catches and landings |
2009 |
Marine Scotland - Science |
ICES rectangle |
Landings data (weight and value of landings into a UK port by vessel size, nationality and gear type for each species) |
2000-2010 |
Marine Scotland |
ICES rectangle |
Satellite ( VMS) data of UK vessels |
2006-2010 |
Marine Monitoring Centre, Marine Scotland |
ICES rectangle |
Vessel surveillance data by nationality and gear type |
2006-2010 |
Marine Monitoring Centre, Marine Scotland |
Statistical Districts |
Aggregate catch data for salmon and sea trout fisheries by fishing type |
2000-2010 |
Freshwater Laboratory Field Station, Marine Scotland - Science |
Energy Generation
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Development opportunities for supply chain |
All |
Additional supply chain activity (economic value and employment) |
Spatial data on supply chain locations |
√ |
Competition for space (offshore) |
All |
Reduced renewable energy capacity |
Spatial data on leasing areas for different types of renewable energy |
√ |
Competition for transmission capacity |
All |
Either reduced energy output from other energy sources (due to displacement by renewables) or reduced renewable energy capacity |
Information on capacity for electricity transmission (within Scotland and from Scotland to other countries) |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
Amount of electricity generated by energy source in Scotland (Scottish Environmental Statistics Online) |
2009 |
Scottish Government Statistics |
Scotland |
National Renewables Infrastructure Plan |
2010 |
SE & HIE (2010) |
Scotland |
Blue Seas - Green Energy - A Sectoral Marine Plan for Offshore Wind Energy in Scottish Territorial Waters |
2010 |
Scottish Government |
Scotland |
Potential Development Scenarios for Scottish Offshore Wind Supply Chain |
2010 |
Scottish Renewables (2010) |
Scotland |
Scotland's Offshore Wind Route Map - Developing Scotland's Offshore Wind Industry to 2020 |
2010 |
Offshore Wind Industry Group |
Scotland |
The Offshore Valuation - A valuation of the UK's offshore renewable energy resource |
2010 |
Public Interest Research Centre on behalf of The Offshore Valuation Group (2010) |
Scotland |
Scottish Offshore Wind: Creating an Industry to Scottish Renewables |
2010 |
IPA Energy + Water Economics (2010) |
Scotland |
Information and analysis of wave and tidal market in Scotland |
2011 |
Pure Marine Gen Ltd (2011) |
Scotland |
Draft Electricity Generation Policy Statement 2010 |
2010 |
Scottish Government |
Scotland |
A Low Carbon Economic Strategy for Scotland |
2010 |
Scottish Government |
Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters |
Supply Chain Demand - PFOW Round 1 Wave and tidal Projects |
2011 |
BVG Associates (2011) |
West Coast |
Scottish Offshore Renewables Development Sites |
2011 |
Scottish Development International, Highlands and Islands Enterprise, and Scottish Enterprise (2011) |
Scotland |
Scotland's Renewable Energy Potential: realising the 2020 target |
2005 |
Scottish Executive (2005), Future Generation Group Report |
Scotland |
Scottish Renewable Energy Generation Capacity |
2010 |
Scottish Renewables |
Scotland |
Interim Great Britain Seven Year Statement |
2004 |
National Grid (2004) |
Scotland |
Scottish and Southern Energy plc Annual Report 2011 |
2011 |
Scottish and Southern Energy plc (2011) |
Military
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Interference with radar systems |
Wind |
The need to provide radar mitigation for strategic en-route and low level radar interference. |
Location of future offshore wind farm developments in areas of importance to strategic en-route and low level radar systems |
√ |
Interference with underwater communications |
All |
Displacement of activity leading to increased costs |
Submarine and other exercise areas |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
Scottish Naval Exercise Areas Information |
2010 |
|
Scotland |
Defence Analytical Services and Advice. DASA Quad Service. 4 |
2010 |
Oil and Gas
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Increased difficulty of access |
All |
Increased maintenance costs for pipeline owners; loss of revenue for asset owners; loss of revenue for dependent businesses/customers |
Producing platforms and pipeline location information. Information on the frequency of maintenance / inspection and route usage information. |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
All pipelines and cables |
Current |
SeaZone Solutions Ltd and UKDEAL |
UK |
Oil pipelines - Subsea pipelines and umbilical's related to the petroleum industry. |
Current |
UKDEAL |
UK |
Oil and gas employment |
2009 |
Oil and Gas UK 2010 Economic report: http://www.oilandgasuk.co.uk/cmsfiles/modules/publications/pdfs/EC021.pdf |
Scotland |
Revenues and production from Scottish Sea areas (2005-2008). Oil, gas and NGL production and revenue (2005-2008) for all Scottish waters and regional breakdown. |
2005-2008 |
Baxter et al (2011) |
Ports and Harbours
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Reduced development opportunities |
All |
Loss of customers and revenue (long-term); increased costs associated with development |
Projected future developments at risk. |
√ |
Increased development opportunities |
All |
Commercial opportunities for port expansion associated with construction, operation and maintenance activities. |
Projected changes in development based on assessing supply chain benefits. |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
UK |
Employment and GVA multipliers for ports (all UK) |
2009 |
Oxford Economics (March 2009): "The Economic Contribution of Ports to the UK Economy" www.ukmajorports.org.uk/file_library/file_library_files/download/173 |
UK |
Marine Traffic, passenger numbers and cargo volume |
2000-2010 |
Department for Transport "Transport Statistics" |
UK |
Port and harbour locations, port types, port ownership, contact details |
Current |
Ports and Harbours of the UK, 2011. |
Scotland |
Maritime transport statistics and overview, generalised information on Scottish Ports. |
2009-2010 |
Baxter et al (2011) The Scottish Government (2011) 'Scotland's Marine Atlas - Information for the National Marine Plan' March 2011 |
Scotland |
Commercial listings of ports in Scotland, service providers, contact details, description of services and current development plans. |
Current to 2009 |
Port of Scotland (2010) - annual publication (current issue print date 2009) |
Scotland |
Recent trends |
To 2008 |
British Ports Association (2008) |
Power Interconnectors
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Increased difficulty of access |
All |
Increased maintenance costs for cable owners; loss of revenue for asset owners; loss of revenue for dependent businesses/ customers |
Cable location information. Information on the frequency of maintenance / inspection and route usage information. |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
All pipelines and cables |
Current |
SeaZone Solutions Ltd |
Scotland |
Power cables (submarine electricity cables) |
Current |
Baxter et al. (2011) |
Scotland |
Potential future subsea cable developments / reinforcements |
2009 |
National Planning Framework for Scotland Annex National development 11 (Scottish Government, 2009b) |
Recreational Boating
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Alterations to informal cruising routes; loss or alteration of 'essential routes' into sheltered harbours and anchorages |
All |
Increased fuel costs for motorized vessels; possible relocation of vessels leading to loss of revenues for supply chain |
Spatially resolved information on recreational vessel movements. Information on vessel type and draught supplemented with any additional data collected for site specific navigation risk assessment. |
√ |
Displacement of vessels into higher risk areas |
All |
Increased costs to boat owners; possible relocation of vessels leading to loss of revenues for supply chain |
As above |
X Risks managed through navigation risk assessment; thus reduced to acceptable levels |
Increased collision risk with rotor blades and/or sub-surface structures |
All |
Reduction in activity levels leading to loss of revenue for supply chain |
As above |
X Risks managed through navigation risk assessment; thus reduced to acceptable levels |
Impacts to landscape or seascape |
Wind |
Reduction in activity levels leading to loss of revenue for supply chain |
Information used to inform an LVIA such as landscape/seascape sensitivity and character |
X (Baseline information will be provided in SEA) |
Additional opportunities created such as increased land-based infrastructure ( e.g. all weather harbours, all tide slipways, boat storage areas) arising from the construction and operation of renewable developments designed to accommodate and made available to recreational activities. |
All |
Increase in expenditure by recreational boat owners in the area |
Projected changes in development based on assessing supply chain benefits. |
X Likely to minimal as any benefit will be serendipitous |
Deterrent to investment in marinas/supply chain |
All |
Reduced investment |
Identify potential investment at risk. |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
Statistics on sailing tourism |
No date |
Tourism Resources Company et al (2010) |
All Regions |
Number of resident home berths Number of visiting berths Proportion of total Scotland berths Demand for home berths (occupancy) Visiting craft demand for berths Average annual spend per boat (high, medium and low) Direct expenditure Multipliers (from Scottish Tourism Multiplier Study) Visiting boat nights Visiting boat expenditure Employment Gross Value Added |
No date |
Tourism Resources Company et al (2010) |
Scotland |
Sailing area value and berth numbers |
No date |
Baxter et al (2011) |
Scotland |
RYA cruising routes and sailing areas |
No date |
Baxter et al (2011) |
Shipping
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Obstruction of transiting vessel navigation routes: Increased steaming distances/time Increased marine risk (grounding) through route deviation |
All |
Increased costs; increased insurance costs |
Potential increases in steaming distances/ times, based on AIS data interrogation. For groundings, AIS data could be used to establish the draught profile of vessels transiting the area, to identify potential constraints. |
√ |
Obstruction of established ferry routes: Increased steaming distances/time Reduced turnaround times Increased marine risk (grounding) |
All |
Increased costs to ferry companies |
As above. |
√ |
Increased ship collision risk |
All |
Increased costs; increased insurance costs |
Quantitative marine risk assessment using input traffic levels (from AIS and/or radar surveys). |
X Risks managed through navigation risk assessment; thus reduced to acceptable levels |
Displacement of recreational craft into navigation lanes |
All |
Increased costs; increased insurance costs |
Quantitative marine risk assessment using input traffic levels (from AIS and/or radar surveys). |
X Risks managed through navigation risk assessment; thus reduced to acceptable levels |
Requirement for additional aids to navigation |
All |
Costs of meeting IALA requirements met by developers |
The marking of offshore energy installations are recommended to follow advice from the International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities ( IALA). |
X Risks managed through implementation of required mitigation measures |
Displacement of anchorage areas |
All |
Increased costs |
AIS or radar surveys of the area in comparison with sea usage charting. This information should be matched to local Harbour Authorities information on both formal and informal anchorage within their Harbour Authority areas. |
√ |
Fouling of anchors on cables |
All |
Increased insurance costs |
Shipping lane location, Information on the frequency of fouling events |
√ |
Commercial opportunities to support offshore renewables |
All |
Increased usage of vessels to support offshore renewables through project life cycle |
Supply chain activities relating to shipping and potential scale of activity |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
Number of passengers, cars and commercial vehicles on ferries (graph), Shipping traffic: no. of vessels in a given area during 1st week of Jan.2010 (map), AIS regional maps, |
2005-2010 |
Baxter et al (2011) The Scottish Government (2011) 'Scotland's Marine Atlas - Information for the National Marine Plan' March 2011 |
Scotland |
Scottish Transport Statistics |
2009 |
Scottish Government ( 2009a) |
Scotland |
Scottish Transport Statistics |
2010 |
Scottish Government (2010) |
Scotland |
DfT Maritime Transport Statistics Compendium |
2010 |
DfT (2010) |
Regional |
Regional scale AIS density maps |
2005-present |
Maritime and Coastguard Agency ( MCA) - Direct contact with MCA Office: |
Social and Community
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Population |
All |
Changes in population as a result of changes in employment |
Projected changes in employment. |
√ |
Local employment |
All |
Reduction in employment opportunities; increase in employment opportunities as a result of supply chain development |
Projected changes in employment based on sectoral impacts and supply chain benefits. |
√ |
Deprivation |
All |
Changes in the levels of deprivation as a result of changes in other social factors |
Information on existing levels of deprivation (index) |
√ |
Community wellbeing |
All |
Changes in levels of poverty and neighbourhood perceptions as a result of changes in other social factors |
Information on existing poverty levels and neighbourhood perceptions |
√ |
Housing |
All |
Changes in housing availability as a result of changes in other social factors |
Information on housing stock and availability |
√ |
Health |
All |
Changes in population health |
Self reported health information |
√ |
Education and skills |
All |
Changes in the levels of education and skills |
Information on levels of education and skills |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland Datazone (groups of census output areas) |
Number of business sites by industry sector |
2010 (also 2007 to 2010) |
Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics |
Local authority |
Business birth and death rates (including 3 year survival rates) |
2002 to 2009 |
Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics |
Local authority |
Employment (by industry sector) |
2009 to 2010 |
ONS |
Scotland |
Social economy turnover |
2004 to 2009 |
Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics |
Scotland |
Community well-being (poverty) |
1998/99 to 2007/08 |
Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics |
Local authority |
Percentage of adults who rate their neighbourhood as a very good place to live |
1999/00 to 2007/08 |
Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics |
Local authority |
Education level (education to degree level, percentage receiving job-related training, with low of no qualifications) |
2004 to 2010 |
Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics |
Local authority |
Self-assessed health rating |
1999/00 to 2007/08 |
Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics |
Local authority |
House sale prices |
1993 to 2010 |
Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics |
Datazone (groups of census output areas) |
Index of deprivation (ranks) |
2009 |
Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics |
Local authority |
Population (2001 census and mid-year estimates) |
2001 to 2010 |
Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics |
Telecommunication Cables
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Competition for Space |
All |
Increased costs associated with new cable or pipeline laying operations; increases in subsequent maintenance costs |
Cable location information. |
√ |
Increased difficulty of access for maintenance and inspection |
All |
Increased maintenance costs for cable and pipeline owners; loss of revenue for asset owners; loss of revenue for dependent businesses/customers |
Cable location information. Information on the frequency of maintenance / inspection and route usage information. |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Regional |
Telecom Cable Routes including both in and out of service cables. |
Issue 13/ January 2011 |
|
Scotland |
All pipelines and cables |
Current |
SeaZone Solutions Ltd |
Scotland |
Overview of Telecommunication cables, with lengths of active cables per region. |
No date |
Baxter et al (2011) |
Tourism
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Impacts to landscape or seascape |
Wind |
Reduction in tourism income and investment |
Information on economic value of coastal tourism and employment; potential future investment plans |
√ |
Changes to the local character of an area |
Wind |
Reduction in tourism income and investment |
Information on economic value of coastal tourism and employment; potential future investment plans |
√ |
Disturbance or injury to coastal or marine wildlife* |
All |
Reduction in income for ecotourism businesses |
Distribution of marine wildlife and how this may change in response to offshore energy development in time and space. |
X (Baseline information will be provided in SEA) |
Disturbance or damage to heritage assets |
All |
Reduction in visitor attraction income; reduction in wider tourism income |
Location of heritage assets relative to potential development areas. An assessment of the importance of a site and the consequence of any interaction |
√ |
Creation of new visitor attraction |
All |
Increase in tourism income |
Future visitor number projections based on previous case examples, market and tourist perception studies. |
X (Likely to be small impact unless further investment made to enhance visitor experience) |
* Given that adequate mitigation measures will be required by law to protect marine wildlife, these measures would also be expected to protect associated socio-economic interests.
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
Leisure and recreation statistics |
2011 |
Baxter et al (2011) |
Scotland |
Economic impact of offshore wind farms |
2009 |
GCal Uni (2009) |
Scotland |
Visitor numbers by region |
- 2010 |
Visit Scotland |
Scotland |
The tourism prospectus: investing for growth |
2007 |
Visit Scotland |
Scotland |
Expenditure by coastal and marine wildlife visitors in Scotland. |
2009 |
Bournemouth University (2010) |
Scotland |
Value of whale watching in Scotland |
2009 |
O'Connor et al. (2009) |
Scotland |
Value of conserving whales: impacts of cetacean-related tourism on the economy of rural West Scotland |
2003 |
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems Journal |
Scotland |
Scotland's Coastal and Maritime Managed Heritage Assets; Visitor Numbers and Revenue |
2004-2009 |
Historic Scotland; Visit Scotland |
Scotland |
Fishing tourism research |
2007 |
Visit Scotland |
Scotland |
Value to economy of tourism |
No date |
|
Scotland |
Towards a Strategy for Scotland's Marine Historic Environment |
2009 |
Historic Scotland |
Waste Disposal
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Competition for Space (development of new sea disposal sites) |
All |
Increased disposal costs associated with use of new or less preferred disposal sites. |
Potential future disposal sites. |
√ |
Loss of, or disruption of access to, dredge material disposal sites |
All |
Increased disposal costs associated with use of less preferred disposal sites. |
Location of disposal sites; routes to disposal sites; volumes / frequency of dredge material disposal to each site. Potential future port developments. A site specific assessment should be conducted in consultation with relevant port and harbour authorities for any affected disposal sites. |
√ |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
UK |
Dredge disposal sites and volumes disposed of in the OSPAR Maritime Area |
2009 |
OSPAR, (2009): http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00433_JAMP%20Dumping%20Assessment.pdf |
Scotland |
Potential future port developments |
2009 |
National Planning Framework for Scotland (Scottish Government, 2009b). |
Scotland |
Locations and tonnage at open disposal sites |
2011 |
Baxter et al. (2011) |
Water Sports
Explanation of column content:
Column 1: Describes the potential interaction between the activity and any renewable technology;
Column 2: Identifies the types of offshore renewable development (wind, wave or tidal) for which the interaction may arise;
Column 3: Identifies the potential socio-economic consequence associated with the interaction identified in Column 1;
Column 4: Identifies the indicative information necessary to inform the baseline reviews, in some cases these may be environmental parameters which are not described or mapped in this study; and
Column 5: Based on the information requirements in Column 4 the study team have made a judgment on whether the information should be included in the socio-economic baseline reviews and if not have provided a source for completeness.
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Interaction |
Technology Relevance (Wind, Wave, Tidal) |
Potential Socio-economic Consequence |
Indicative Baseline Information Requirements |
Recommendation on Inclusion of Information in Socio-economic Baseline? |
Impacts to seascape/setting |
All |
Reduction in activity levels leading to loss of revenue for supply chains |
Information used to inform an LVIA such as landscape/seascape sensitivity and character, photo montages and proposed development locations. |
X (Baseline information will be provided in SEA) |
Displacement or obstruction of water sports activity |
All |
Reduction in activity levels leading to loss of revenue for supply chains |
Information on existing levels of activity, expenditure and employment associated with different areas. |
√ |
Collision risk for humans or vessels |
Tidal |
Reduction in activity levels leading to loss of revenue for supply chains |
Risk study at a site specific level based on device location, characteristics and activity intensity levels in that area. |
X Risks managed through navigation risk assessment; thus reduced to acceptable levels |
Changes to the wave climate (wave height, period and direction) altering the quality and consistency of waves for surfing. |
Wind and Tidal |
Reduction in surfing activity leading to loss of revenue for supply chain |
Physical data from project level EIAs and consultation with stakeholders |
X Baseline information will be provided in SEA. Changes likely to be very small |
Additional opportunities created such as increased land-based infrastructure ( e.g. all weather harbours, all tide slipways, boat storage areas) arising from the construction and operation of renewable developments designed to accommodate and made available to recreational activities. |
All |
Increase in expenditure by water sport participants in the area |
Projected changes in development based on assessing supply chain investments. |
X Changes likely to be very small and dependent on site specific factors which cannot be predicted at regional level |
Impacts on fish stocks of angling target species as a result of impacts to feeding, breeding and/or migration of species of angling interest ( e.g. collision risk or disruption/disturbance through increased noise, vibration, turbidity or electromagnetic fields). |
All |
Reduction in recreational angling leading to loss of revenue for supply chain |
Impact assessment information undertaken as part of the SEA/ HRA process |
X Baseline information will be provided in SEA |
Scale |
Information Available |
Date |
Source |
---|---|---|---|
Scotland |
Number of sea anglers |
2006-2007 |
Radford et al (2009) |
Scotland |
Economic impact of sea angling (by region) |
No date |
Radford et al (2009) |
Scotland |
Angler days by resident, by origin, by type (short, boat, charter) |
No date |
|
Scotland |
Expenditure |
No date |
|
Scotland |
Trends (days fished, competitiveness of region) |
No date |
|
Scotland |
Output of DREAM® model gives multipliers (associated with angling) |
No date |
|
Scotland |
Estimated regional sea angling activity and expenditure (also for Scotland) |
No date |
Baxter et al (2011) |
Scotland |
Origin and destination of overnight fishing trips to Scotland |
2006-2007 |
Radford et al (2009) |
Highlands and Islands |
Statistics on water sports |
No date |
George Street Research & Jones Economics (2004) |
References
Baxter, J.M., Boyd, I.L., Cox, M., Donald, A.E., Malcolm, S.J., Miles, H., Miller, B., Moffat, C.F., (Editors), 2011. Scotland's Marine Atlas: Information for the national marine plan. Marine Scotland, Edinburgh. pp. 191.
Bournemouth University, 2010.The Economic Impact of Wildlife Tourism in Scotland. A report for the Scottish Government.
British Ports Association, 2008. Scottish Ports Committee Ports in Scotland "Delivering Value".
BVG Associates, 2011. Wave and tidal energy in the Pentland Firth and Orkney waters: How the projects could be built. A report for The Crown Estate. May 2011.
Crawley, D., 2010. Report of the Scottish Mixed Stock Salmon Fisheries Working Group. Report by the Steering Group of the Freshwater Fisheries Forum, 100pp.
Department for Transport, 2009. UK Air Passenger Demand and CO2 Forecasts
Department for Transport, 2010. Maritime Statistics Compendium
http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/statistics/datatablespublications/maritime/compendium/.
George Street Research and Jones Economics, 2004. Economic Impact and Development Opportunities for Outdoor and Environment Related Recreation in the Highlands and Islands. A report for HIE.
Glasgow Caledonian University and Cogent Strategies International Ltd. 2008. The economic impacts of wind farms on Scottish Tourism. A report for the Scottish Government, March 2008.
IPA Energy and Water Economics, 2010. Scottish Offshore Wind: Creating an Industry. Report to Scottish Renewables.
Marine Scotland, 2009. Scottish Shellfish Farm Production Survey. 2009 Report.
Marine Scotland, 2010. Scottish Shellfish Farm Production Survey. 2010 Report.
National Grid, 2004. )Interim Great Britain Seven Year Statement.
O'Connor, S., Campbell, R., Cortez, H., & Knowles, T., 2009, Whale Watching Worldwide: tourism numbers, expenditures and expanding economic benefits, a special report from the International Fund for Animal Welfare, Yarmouth MA, USA, prepared by Economists at Large.
Oil and Gas UK, 2010. Economic report 2010.
Available online: http://www.oilandgasuk.co.uk/cmsfiles/modules/publications/pdfs/EC021.pdf
OSPAR Commission, 2009. JAP assessment of the environmental impact of dumping of wastes at sea.
Available online: http://www.ospar.org/documents/dbase/publications/p00433_JAMP%20Dumping%20Assessment.pdf
Oxford Economics, 2009, The economic contribution of ports to the UK economy, March 2009.
Port of Scotland, 2009. Port of Scotland, 2010 - annual publication (current issue print date 2009)
Ports & Harbours of the UK, 2011.
Website: http://www.ports.org.uk/
Public Interest Research Centre on behalf of The Offshore Valuation Group, 2010. The Offshore Valuation - A valuation of the UK's offshore renewable energy resource.
Pure Marine Gen Ltd, 2011. Information and analysis of wave and tidal market in Scotland.
Radford, A., Riddington, G. and Gibson, H. 2009. Economic Impact of Recreational Sea Angling in Scotland. Prepared for the Scottish Government. July 2009. ISBN: 978-0-7559-8130-4
Scottish and Southern Energy plc, 2011. Scottish and Southern Energy plc Annual Report 2011.
Scottish Centre for Carbon Storage ( SCCS), 2009. Opportunities for CO2 storage around Scotland: An integrated strategic research study. Report for the Scottish Government. April, 2009.
Scottish Centre for Carbon Storage ( SCCS), 2011. Progressing Scotland's CO2 storage opportunities. Report for the Scottish Government. March, 2011.
Scottish Development International, Highlands and Islands Enterprise, and Scottish Enterprise, 2011. Scottish Offshore Renewables Development Sites.
Scottish Enterprise & Highlands & Islands Enterprise, 2010. National Renewables Infrastructure Plan Stage 2. July 2010.
Scottish Executive, 2005. Scotland's Renewable Energy Potential: realising the 2020 target.
Scottish Government and Scottish Enterprise, 2010. Carbon capture and Storage - A Roadmap for Scotland. March 2010.
Scottish Government, 2009a. Scottish Transport Statistics: No. 28 - 2009 Edition:
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2009/12/18095042/0.
Scottish Government, 2009b. National Planning Framework for Scotland 2.
Scottish Government, 2010. Scottish Transport Statistics: No. 29 - 2009 Edition:
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/933/0109841.pdf
Scottish Government, 2011. High Level summary of statistics: Social and welfare.
Available online: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/933/0116815.pdf
Scottish Renewables, 2010. Scottish Renewable Energy Generation Capacity.
Scottish Salmon Producers' Organisation, 2010. Scottish Salmon Farming Industry Research Report. Published December 2010.
Tourism Resources Company et al, 2010. Sailing Tourism in Scotland, report for Scottish Executive, February 2010.
Wilding, T.A., Kelly, M.S. and Black, K.D. 2006. Alternative marine sources of protein and oil for aquaculture feeds: state of the art and recommendations for further research. The Crown Estate, 63 pages
Contact
There is a problem
Thanks for your feedback