Tackling child poverty pathfinders: evaluability assessment

An evaluability assessment of the Child Poverty Pathfinders in Glasgow and Dundee to inform the development of an evaluation plan for the Pathfinder approach. Includes an evaluability assessment report and accompanying theories of change and initial monitoring framework to support evaluation.


Appendix 3 – Ethical framework

Ethical Consideration: Implications for evaluation

Managing disclosures made by families during field research

  • Escalation pathways to access support for individuals, appropriately skilled researchers

Minimising harm to research participants

  • Adhering to the rights of children and families, particularly protective responsibilities around vulnerable groups
  • Trauma informed approaches
  • Voluntary participation and ability to withdraw, and ensuring there isn't an expectation on families to participate in research when receiving support
  • Ensuring evaluation activities are justified in terms of need to answer the research questions
  • Focus on what is relevant and vital to the research need
  • Tailor research approach to individual need
  • Lived experience input into research design

Managing identification of fraud or illegal activity through field research

  • Clear guidance on what to do with this information
  • Appropriately skilled researchers
  • Understanding of how to interpret data where there may be inaccuracies as a result of fraud

Managing conversations on sensitive issues

  • Trauma informed approaches
  • Being cognisant of stigma around poverty
  • Appropriately skilled researchers

Reducing barriers to participation in field research

  • Accessible research in terms of practicality to participate and the way conversations are had to enable meaningful contribution and productive and positive conversations
  • Tailor approaches to individual need, ensuring there isn't an expectation on families to participate in research when receiving support

Ensuring research is mutually beneficial for the researcher and participant

  • Feedback loops of findings
  • Incentive/thank you vouchers
  • Efficient and careful use of participant's time, lived experience input into research design

Ensuring informed consent

  • Providing detail on the context and purpose of the work
  • Ensuring people know participating is voluntary
  • Explaining how their information will be protected and used
  • Not over promising benefits of participating
  • Framing it as a pilot that will inform service delivery
  • Ensuring their isn't an expectation on families to participate in research when receiving support

Ensuring efficient and justified expenditure on research and evaluation activity

  • Providing detail on the context and purpose of the work
  • Ensuring people know participating is voluntary
  • Explaining how their information will be protected and used
  • Not over promising benefits of participating
  • Framing it as a pilot that will inform future service delivery
  • Ensuring there isn't an expectation on families to participate in research when receiving support

Protecting the time of research participants

  • Ensuring evaluation activities are justified in terms of need to answer the research questions
  • Focus on what is relevant and vital to the research need
  • Having a clear focus for the research
  • Designing efficient and prioritised methods and tools
  • Aligning research activities to minimize duplication and inefficient processes

Ensuring robust and useable research findings

  • A clear understanding of the standards required for evidence collection, analysis and reporting
  • Ensuring that we are articulating the complexity and variability of what success looks like given the needs of families vary
  • Building rapport and trust with research participants to ensure high quality evidence gathered from field research

Managing implicit bias/generalising/stereotyping during research and analysis

  • Appropriately skilled researchers
  • A clear understanding of the standards required for evidence collection, analysis and reporting

Protecting the wellbeing and time of non-participating research groups (e.g. control groups who aren't receiving Pathfinder support)

  • Ensuring evaluation activities are justified in terms of need to answer the research questions
  • Focus on what is relevant and vital to the research need

Protection of personal and sensitive data

  • Strong data protection processes
  • Analysis and reporting protecting anonymity, appropriately skilled researchers

Contact

Email: socialresearch@gov.scot

Back to top